[cyn]

I awakened today with a very bad feeling about this.

Michael (AND others) must have her dead and is hell-bent (so to speak) on making it so. He was NOT simply removed as Terri's guardian, even though he showed himself untrustworthy & in conflict of interest. He is being allowed to continue to bully Terri's family (by some presumably smart, caring people).

Terri is not in a place where she can be monitored or where she will receive appropriate care and support if need be for deteriorated kidney function or sepsis.

This would show up in the lab work that was done at hospital. No wonder they do not want the family to see it.

Michael is a bully, was before, has been all along -- and apparently all I can do is call him names.

[cyn]

Go ahead, say it: "Good morning, Merry Sunshine."

[cyn]

FYI -- excerpt from post #1308:

"Terri is not in a place where she can be monitored or where she will receive appropriate care and support if need be for deteriorated kidney function or sepsis. . . This would show up in the lab work that was done at hospital."...

This was my concern earlier this am.

I called the hospice a while ago. I wanted to know if they were set up to do blood work -- am sure they have to send it out w/longer turnaround time.

I asked what happens if a non-terminal patient requires dialysis or other support. Was told the patient would then taken to hospital (from which she was suddenly and secretly removed last night) "IF the primary attending physician and guardian agree to that form of care." (quote)

My impression is that if Terri does not get a new guardian to truly advocate for her, we will soon be hearing "So sorry to have to announce this, but . . ."

Two physicians were turned away from seeing Terri last night -- from earlier in this thread. Terri's father said she looked worse on return from hospital last night than she did before she went.

She was NOT in a coma before all this began.