Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Census: Record Number of Women Childless
Yahoo! News ^ | 10/24/2003 | GENARO C. ARMAS

Posted on 10/24/2003 4:00:42 PM PDT by yonif

WASHINGTON - Anne Hare and her husband made a momentous decision three years ago: They would not have children. It's not that they don't like kids, she says. They simply don't want to alter the lifestyle they enjoy.

"With kids, especially young kids, infants and toddlers, you really can't do the active stuff we like to do," said Hare, 43, a fitness program coordinator from Gainesville, Ga.

Hare is among 26.7 million women aged 15 to 44 who are childless, a record number, according to new Census Bureau (news - web sites) data from a June 2002 survey. They represent nearly 44 percent of women in that age group.

The number of women 15 to 44 forgoing or putting off motherhood has grown nearly 10 percent since 1990, when roughly 24.3 million were in that class.

Direct comparisons before 1990 are not possible because the bureau didn't track women younger than 18 until then.

The latest numbers reflect the well-established trend of more women going to college and entering the work force, then delaying motherhood or deciding not to have children. More also are choosing adoption, said Martha Farnsworth Riche, a demographer and former head of the Census Bureau.

Hare said she and other childless friends often are incorrectly tagged as "kid-haters."

"It's just difficult to explain to people that we don't hate kids, it's just that we don't want our own," she said.

The percentage of women 40 to 44 — those at the end of their childbearing years — who have not given birth has hovered around 18 percent since 1994, but that's up from 10 percent in 1976.

Non-high school graduates and those with bachelor's degrees were most likely to be childless. Also women with higher incomes had the highest childless rates, in part a reflection of the increased professional options available to them, said David Popenoe, co-director of the National Marriage Project, a research group at Rutgers University.

Amy Caizza, study director for the Institute for Women's Policy Research (news - web sites), a Washington think tank, said society's attitudes about childless women also have changed.

"Economic reasons are part of it, but it's also the effect of the women's movement, that you don't have to be a mother to be a complete woman," she said.

Just over half of Asian women were childless, the highest rate among race and ethnic groups. It was 46 percent for non-Hispanic whites, 39 percent for blacks and 36 percent for Hispanics.

Last year about 33 percent of all births were to unmarried women, roughly the same rate since 1998, said Census Bureau demographer Barbara Downs. Blacks were more likely than Hispanics or whites to have out-of-wedlock births.

Roughly 23 percent of the 25.8 million never-married women 15 to 44 were mothers in 2002, about the same rate from 1998 but up from 18 percent of the 20.7 million never-married women in 1990. There was a pronounced increase among never-married women in managerial or professional jobs who were mothers — the percentage has nearly doubled from 9 percent in 1990 to 16 percent in 2002.

Many women in these occupations can earn salaries that enable them to raise a child on their own if they choose, Riche said.

"In earlier days, you had stigma and economic reasons" for these unmarried, professional women not to have kids, she said. "It's much less so now."

Also, about 8 percent of births were to women in unmarried partnerships, the first time the bureau had tracked such a category in the survey.

The report also showed a birth rate of 61 births per 1,000 women 15 to 44 in 2002, down from 67 per 1,000 in 1990. During the same period, it also found the birth rate for women 15 to 19 rose from 40 per 1,000 to 56 per 1,000.

That's far different from National Center for Health Statistics data, which in 2001 showed the birth rate for 15- to 19-year-olds at 45 per 1,000, declining steadily since 1990 from 60 per 1,000.

Government researchers, academics and the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, an advocacy group, said they considered NCHS birth data more accurate because it is based on official vital records from hospitals.

The census report was based on a survey of 50,000 homes.

___

On the Net:

Census Bureau release: http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/fertility.html


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: census; childless; motherhood; population; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

1 posted on 10/24/2003 4:00:42 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yonif
I don't see anything wrong with that; people who don't want kids definitely shouldn't have them.
2 posted on 10/24/2003 4:04:59 PM PDT by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Shouldn't the headline be,"Census: Record Number of Women and Men Childless"?
3 posted on 10/24/2003 4:11:26 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pedantic_Lady
It's kind of sad, though.

You're not young forever. When these parents hit their mid-50s and 60s they'll be thinking twice.

4 posted on 10/24/2003 4:15:15 PM PDT by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Perhaps, yes, but they don't usually regret their decision. I work with a woman in her late 40s who doesn't have children...unlike many women who are childless by choice, she thinks small children are actually evil. A good friend of mine here had a baby 2 months ago and she came in to the office with me last week to talk to the boss and have a few questions about maternity leave answered. She left the baby with me at my desk, and naturally I couldn't work while holding a baby, so I toted him around the office so everyone could see him. Most of the people there ooohed and awwwed over him (and he's PRECIOUS) but this woman actually recoiled in horror and begged me to keep the baby far from her.

Uhhh...sure. More cuddle time for ME, then! A lot of these women absolutely don't regret their choices, but people like me (who WANT children) can't understand where they're coming from because wanting children is so natural to us.
5 posted on 10/24/2003 4:18:00 PM PDT by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yonif
40 years ago marriage and children was the thing to do. Now for many it isn't. Economics and high population numbers combine to bring this reality. Perhaps some areas have negative population growth but they are far from depopulated and other areas more than make up the difference. Everyone should be free to start a family--it is a human right according to the UN Declaration of Human Rights but everyone should be free to not start a family if they so choose.
6 posted on 10/24/2003 4:21:09 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pedantic_Lady
She needs a a good shrink. Something not right there.
7 posted on 10/24/2003 4:21:49 PM PDT by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pedantic_Lady
Well at least they're making a decision instead of having Planned Parenthood make it for them.
8 posted on 10/24/2003 4:22:13 PM PDT by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Men don't have children silly! ;-)
9 posted on 10/24/2003 4:25:35 PM PDT by stands2reason ("What you see at fight club is a generation of men raised by women." -- Chuck Palahniuk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Note the tagline...
10 posted on 10/24/2003 4:26:58 PM PDT by stands2reason ("What you see at fight club is a generation of men raised by women." -- Chuck Palahniuk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Anne Hare and her husband made a momentous decision three years ago: They would not have children. It's not that they don't like kids, she says. They simply don't want to alter the lifestyle they enjoy.

short sighted idiots. Who would you rather have choose your retirement home when you get that old ? Your flesh and blood or a complete stranger ?

11 posted on 10/24/2003 4:27:45 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Virtue untested is innocence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
She needs to get over herself and rediscover love.
12 posted on 10/24/2003 4:27:53 PM PDT by reed_inthe_wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yonif
That headline reminds me of a short story I once read in one of those science fiction pulp anthology magazines. It had to do with some kind of epidemic of spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) in the world, and how that pregnant women got so rare, and the world population was threatened, that having a baby turned into the number one most desired thing on every couples list. Abortion was virutally eliminated and all the abortion clinics closed down. Turns out it was some kind of virus of some sort, released by some scientist or other, who after the world wide attitude shift, released some kind of antidote (no charge). Quite interesting.
13 posted on 10/24/2003 4:29:05 PM PDT by BSunday (Don't get me started)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pedantic_Lady
but people like me (who WANT children) can't understand where they're coming from because wanting children is so natural to us.

I believe you're right about the not being able to "understand where they're coming from because wanting children is so natural to us". I'm a 58 year old female who never had a desire to be a parent. I doubt if either side will understand the other, but that doesn't really bother me. What disturbs me is where the article stated that "last year about 33 percent of all births were to unmarried women". I wish those kids had dads at home with them.

14 posted on 10/24/2003 4:30:32 PM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
Sounds a bit like the Handmaid's Tale.
15 posted on 10/24/2003 4:30:44 PM PDT by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver
Me too...I think kids deserve a father...but sometimes it's better if dad isn't around. My father-in-law was a horrible parent and eventually left my mother-in-law when my husband was 16 and though my husband is permanently scarred by his father's abuse, I believe it would have been far worse had his father stayed.
16 posted on 10/24/2003 4:31:44 PM PDT by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yonif
She gets the Darwin award for making her line extinct.
17 posted on 10/24/2003 4:32:32 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
She needs a a good shrink. Something not right there.

She is a bit crazy, but she's one of those weird old English women who keep horses and drive sports cars. It seems to be almost a sub-species here...there are a lot of fortyish and fiftyish English women with horses and Toyota MR2s. Must be genetic.

18 posted on 10/24/2003 4:33:41 PM PDT by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I decided 30 years ago, at the age of 21, never to have kids. Best decision I ever made!!! (p.s. Joey is my Pomeranian -- best kid ever!)
19 posted on 10/24/2003 4:35:29 PM PDT by joey'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
Yikes, I agree. Recoiling because of a baby? She must have other problems. Therapy would do her some good.
20 posted on 10/24/2003 4:35:42 PM PDT by baseballfanjm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson