Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amber Waves Of Grain And Other Cereals Crucial To Humans on Mars
spacedaily.com ^ | 27 Oct 03 | staff

Posted on 10/27/2003 10:28:29 AM PST by RightWhale

Amber Waves Of Grain And Other Cereals Crucial To Humans on Mars

Washington - Oct 24, 2003

Mars came nearer to Earth this year than it has in more than 50,000 years, but a new technology could bring it closer still. Scientists have developed a fully sustainable disposal system to deal with waste on long-range space flights using a simple byproduct of wheat.

Wheat grass, an inedible part of the wheat plant, can be used to reclaim pollutants produced from burning waste on a spaceship, according to researchers from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and NASA. The wheat grass itself would normally be trash, but now it can be put to good use in a process that moves the space program one step closer to a manned mission to Mars.

The findings are in the current issue (September/October) of Energy & Fuels, a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal of the American Chemical Society, the world's largest scientific society.

A manned mission to Mars has long been a goal of the space program, though it is still just a prospect of the fairly distant future. Such a mission would take about three years, depending on the proximity of Mars in its orbit.

"In these three years, you cannot have a supply from Earth, like in a space station," says Shih-Ger Chang, Ph.D., a senior scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California and lead author of the paper. "So the key is to develop a way for a sustainable supply of material to the astronauts. They need a fully regenerative life support system because they have to conserve the materials that they carry with them."

The main problem facing astronauts will be their own "biomass" - human feces and inedible portions of crops grown for food, such as wheat grass. "If they discard wheat grass or human feces into space, then they throw away nutrients," Chang says. "The astronauts need to recover everything for reuse."

One promising method to deal with this waste is to burn it. Incineration rapidly and completely converts the waste to carbon dioxide, water and minerals, and it is a thoroughly developed technology here on earth. Although plants readily absorb carbon dioxide, the major difficulty with incineration, especially in an enclosed spaceship, is that it produces other pollutants, like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.

We have effective ways of dealing with these pollutants on Earth but they all require expendable materials, such as activated carbon, which need to be replaced every few months.

And that's where growing wheat in space comes into play. The inedible portion of the wheat - the wheat grass - can be converted to activated carbon onboard the space vehicle by heating it to about 600 C.

Emissions from waste incineration are then sent through the activated carbon, which absorbs nitrogen oxides. These are subsequently recovered and converted to nitrogen, ammonia and nitrates. The nitrogen can be used to replace cabin pressure leakage, while the ammonia and nitrates can be used as fertilizer. When the activated carbon loses its capacity to absorb nitrogen oxides, the process starts over with new wheat grass.

In earlier research, Chang and his colleagues demonstrated that gas from the incineration of biomass contains insignificant amounts of sulfur dioxide, so they focused their efforts in this study on controlling nitrogen oxides.

Wheat for a spaceship can be grown hydroponically - in a nutrient solution exposed to artificial sunlight.

About 203 kilograms of carbon derived from wheat straw could be produced per year, which should be more than enough to sustain a crew of six astronauts, according to Chang's calculations.

"It's a recyclable and sustainable process," Chang says. The technology is also simple to operate and functional under microgravity conditions.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Technical
KEYWORDS: acs; biomass; cereals; space; wheat
2 years aboard a small spaceship without resupply and no cleaning lady. That's the real challenge of space exploration.
1 posted on 10/27/2003 10:28:29 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; KevinDavis
Any private companies working on life support aside from that facility in Canada? Devon Island [?]
2 posted on 10/27/2003 10:33:32 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Now that the Bio-Sphere in Arizona shut down, I don't think the US is looking at long-range self-sustaining environments.
3 posted on 10/27/2003 10:52:01 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The solids from the wheat grass may be inedible but the juice is touted as a major nutrient rich addition to almost any diet.
4 posted on 10/27/2003 11:02:42 AM PST by Geritol (Lord willing, there will be a later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
We're getting closer, bump!
5 posted on 10/27/2003 11:18:00 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
They ought to get something going soon. Even if they put off a mission to Mars, there is still the moon. Within 10 years somebody will be walking on the moon again; it could be Americans, but probably won't be at the present rate of progress.
6 posted on 10/27/2003 11:19:27 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"If they discard wheat grass or human feces into space, then they throw away nutrients," Chang says. "The astronauts need to recover everything for reuse."

[full body shudder]

7 posted on 10/27/2003 11:21:15 AM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I think we need to finish the space station and then start building something on the moon. That way we would be just a little closer to mars.

It may not be much in the grand scale of space, but anything helps.
8 posted on 10/27/2003 11:25:23 AM PST by areeves79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


9 posted on 10/27/2003 11:25:38 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
If they would just get off their duffs and develop nuclear rocket engines, we could get to Mars in 30 days instead of 9 months, vastly simplifying the recycling problem.
10 posted on 10/27/2003 11:34:29 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Devon Island is the Mars Arctic Research Station run by the Mars Society, http://www.marssociety.org/
11 posted on 10/27/2003 11:35:05 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Wheat grass, an inedible part of the wheat plant, ...

I chuckled at this. Go talk to any healthfood nut (I'll bet I'm gonna get an earfull from the Barleygreen drinkers here) about wheat grass exctracts. You'll have a tough time convincing them that wheat grass is inedible. :)

12 posted on 10/27/2003 11:36:26 AM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areeves79
The propulsion delta-V to get from Earth to the Moon is higher than the delta-V to get from Earth to Mars if you take into account the ability to use the Martian atmosphere to slow down.

So in a way, Mars is closer than the Moon.
13 posted on 10/27/2003 11:36:34 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
2 years aboard a small spaceship without resupply and no cleaning lady. That's the real challenge of space exploration.

The real challege is bugs, claustrophobia and fugus. Bugs eggs are everywhere. Claustrophobia - three years with the same people? What about relationships - jealousies, marraiges? Fungus, grows on everything over time - even wheat.

None of these are small issues. Better to work on a matter transporter - Star Trek had it right.

14 posted on 10/27/2003 11:42:11 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
None of these are small issues.

There were problems on MIR with metal- and glass-eating microbes. On the ISS they can bail out on a moment's notice, but on Mars, the moon, any ship going to or from, and later starships, there will be no bailing out. In a way it would be worse than the movies Alien, Aliens, or Alienses.

15 posted on 10/27/2003 11:48:53 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me; RightWhale; demlosers; Prof Engineer; BlazingArizona; ThreePuttinDude; Brett66; ...
It seems that they have made more progress than NASA has. I say to ell with NASA and let private industry do the job of sending humans into space.

Space Ping! This is the space ping list! Let me know if you want on or off this list!
16 posted on 10/27/2003 4:33:04 PM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
The Chinese are making progress on space farming. This may be a big part of the key to extremely long duration space missions, and NASA could do well with this if they were so tasked. Why wouldn't NASA do this anyway?
17 posted on 10/27/2003 4:37:32 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Cause NASA is run by a bunch of frickin idiots.
18 posted on 10/27/2003 4:45:16 PM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Probably not. They are on a short rein. There is some amazing stuff in the backs of file cabinet drawers in non-descript offices throughout NASA. If they ever get the bit in their teeth, watch out!
19 posted on 10/27/2003 4:53:54 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
If they ever get the bit in their teeth, watch out!

I expect you're right. But the chances of them every being given free rein (to thoroughly mix your metaphor) are depressingly slim.

Although it occurs to me that if we just privatized NASA - told them, "Make money or you're out of jobs" we might see some amazing things happen.

20 posted on 10/27/2003 8:41:38 PM PST by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson