Skip to comments.
Laci Peterson hearing set to begin
USAToday ^
| Posted 10/29/2003 6:53 AM
| Al Golube
Posted on 10/29/2003 5:36:29 AM PST by runningbear
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440, 441-452 next last
To: runningbear
Still doing my vidcaps, not so right many right now, with no insdie coverage, but I did get a pic of Buoy #4 from CCL Late Night's Gloria Gomez interview.
Anything you're looking for?
Laci Peterson Disappearance
401
posted on
10/29/2003 10:19:49 PM PST
by
hergus
To: hergus; Devil_Anse
Thanks, hergus! Anse, didn't you want to know if the buoy had a light on it?
To: Howlin
anybody have any idea what that stone is? Appears to be a sapphire.
To: Sandylapper
"In the lower left hand corner, does that say $77.00? If so, I'd say "naw".'Tehehe! I just picked a picture of a Blue Onyx and never noticed what it said the cost of the cuff links were.As in most jewelry, I am sure it can cost a lot more than that.
Here is a site of gems and I still think the ring Arnold is wearing looks more like the Blue Onyx than the Turquoise.:-) GemStones
404
posted on
10/29/2003 11:01:42 PM PST
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: Spunky; Sandylapper
See post # 403
To: grizzfan; Sandylapper; Howlin
"Appears to be a sapphire. Could be, but the sapphire looks like light can shine through it and the stone in Arnolds ring looks dense
Also I don't think you would ever see a sapphire cut like the stone in Arnolds ring.
SAPPHIRE
406
posted on
10/29/2003 11:15:48 PM PST
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: hergus; pbear8
407
posted on
10/30/2003 2:42:49 AM PST
by
runningbear
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
To: STOCKHRSE
WHAT is not true, period? That he was twisting chicken wire? How do we know whether that's true or not?
I heard there were TWO pieces of hair in the bag. Where are you hearing that there are three?
Are you saying that THIS judge, Girolami, said on Oct. 29, 2003, that "mitochondrial was admitted, but not as forensic evidence"?
To: Canadian Outrage
GOOD! So when the defense puts Lee up there during the trial, the prosecution needs to pull out that clip of Lee talking about the clothes and play it!!!
Nothing like having the other side's own witness confirm that your evidence is meaningful!
To: Yaelle
LOL, thanks... my favorite part so far is where Jackie's oxygen tank fell crashing to the floor. Talk about a show-stopper. Hope it didn't land on someone's foot.
To: Yaelle
Cool! Where'd you meet her, Yaelle?
To: Yaelle
Hey, whenever I mess with bleach I have to put on pure white clothes first! Wonder if any of Scott's clothes have bleach discoloration?
And for sure, it takes forever for the smell of the bleach to dissipate.
To: runningbear
lets see if Geragos postpones it again!I keep thinking, when are they going to lock Geragos up. Bet he'd show then. He definitely has shown contempt for this court. Shyster, shyster, shyster! Delay, delay, delay!
Is he kin to the Clinton's? Maybe by money (Susan McDougald sp).
413
posted on
10/30/2003 5:00:05 AM PST
by
auboy
(Liberals believe in free speech… theirs not yours.)
To: STOCKHRSE
Other reports say everything that was taken was returned. And it was also said that Scott didn't care to press charges.
There was a murderer (killed wife and kids), someone here was talking about him and they can remind me what his name is, who arranged a break-in of his house while his charges were pending. Scott may have done something similar. The "burglar" was in fact a friend of his. Funny how he just wanted to drop the whole thing.
Seems awfully funny that any burglar would just take a maternity outfit. Even if the burglar was a "clothes thief", why wouldn't he have taken all the clothes? Frankly, I've never heard of a burglar taking clothes, period.
The scene was contaminated anyway, the moment Scott walked back into his house for the first time after his wife was murdered.
To: Sandylapper
Suppose a hair is caught in some needle-nose pliers. It makes sense to me that one might not be able to get the hair out of the pliers w/o breaking it. Or at least the hair would have a very weak, damaged place on it--the exact place where it was caught in the pliers.
To: Sandylapper; hergus
Thanks! The buoy has a light in it.
To: Canadian Outrage; All
In my post 409, I was referring to Henry Lee.
To: auboy
noticed that Geragos didn't have a loud mouth/voice as he usually does yesterday... ;o)
418
posted on
10/30/2003 5:35:20 AM PST
by
runningbear
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
To: Canadian Outrage
yep, but they are going to try and hope they doop some potential jurors of it....
419
posted on
10/30/2003 5:40:20 AM PST
by
runningbear
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
To: Devil_Anse; STOCKHRSE
And the "clothes" that were taken was Laci's wedding dress, right?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440, 441-452 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson