Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lethal Virus from 1918 Genetically Reconstructed
The Sunshine Project ^ | 9 October 2003

Posted on 10/31/2003 12:10:53 PM PST by GluteusMax

Lethal Virus from 1918 Genetically Reconstructed
US Army scientists create "Spanish Flu" virus in laboratory - medical benefit questionable

(Austin and Hamburg, 9 October 2003) – The 'Spanish Flu' influenza virus that killed 20-40 million people in 1918 is currently under reconstruction. Several genes of the extraordinarily lethal 1918 flu virus have been isolated and introduced into contemporary flu strains. These proved to be lethal for mice, while virus constructs with genes from a current flu virus types had hardly any effect. These experiments may easily be abused for military purposes, but provide little benefit from a medical or public health point of view.

The 1918 Spanish Flu was highly infectious and – in comparison to contemporary flu viruses – killed a very high percentage of those infected, including many younger people. The Spanish Flu alone caused the medium life expectancy in the US in 1918 to drop by 10 years. Hence, flu viruses are perceived today as a serious biological warfare threat. Just two weeks ago, a 15 million dollar research grant was awarded in the US to develop protective measures especially against a bioterrorist attack with flu viruses.

Despite the very dangerous nature of the 1918 virus, efforts to reconstruct it started in the mid 1990s, when Dr Jeffrey Taubenberger from the US Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Washington DC succeeded in recovering and sequencing fragments of the viral RNA from preserved tissues of 1918 victims. In the current issue of the scientific journal Emerging Infectious Diseases new genetic details of the 1918 flu virus will be published.

But after (partially) unravelling the genetic sequence of the virus, the scientists went a step further and began bringing the Spanish flu back to life. Unnoticed by the public, they succeeded in creating a live virus containing two 1918 genes that proved to be very lethal in animal experiments. This experiment is only one genetic step away from taking the 1918 demon entirely out of the bottle.

A resuscitation of the Spanish flu is neither necessary nor warranted from a public health point of view. Allegedly, the recent experiments sought to test the efficacy of existing antiviral drugs on the 1918 construct. But there is little need for antiviral drugs against the 1918 strain if the 1918 strain had not been recreated in the first place "It simply does not make any scientific sense to create a new threat just to develop new countermeasures against it." says Jan van Aken, biologist with the Sunshine Project, "Genetic characterization of influenza strains has important biomedical applications. But it is not justifiable to recreate this particularly dangerous eradicated strain that could wreak havoc if released, deliberately or accidentally."

Construction of new maximum security (BSL-4) laboratories for biodefense research has been justified in part by citing the potential of the Spanish Flu as a biological weapon. Influenza usually requires a low level of containment; but when scientists begin recombining virulence-related genes, the danger dramatically increases. The University of Texas Medical Branch's BSL-4 plans influenza 'gene reassortment' experiments in maximum containment. "This kind of research is creating a vicious circle, and could prompt a race by biodefense scientists to genetic engineer unthinkable diseases", says Edward Hammond of the Sunshine Project, "What disease comes after influenza? Biodefense laboratories must not become self-fulfilling prophesy centers. The world does not need biodefense programs to create a 'genetically engineered disease gap'."

From an arms control perspective it appears to be particularly sensitive if a military research institution embarks on a project that aims at constructing more dangerous pathogens. "If Jeffery Taubenberger worked in a Chinese, Russian or Iranian laboratory, his work might well be seen as the 'smoking gun' of an offensive biowarfare program," says van Aken.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bioterror; bioweapons; hammond; spanishflu; taubenberger; virus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: genefromjersey
It would not surprise me to learn they ( or some of their more ardent followers ) have been behind some of the "unusual incidents" in some of the biolabs.

It would not surprise me if some lefty group with an enviromentalist bent purposely releashed something like this to "cleanse mother earth of evil humanity." Which is precisely why it is insanity to isolate the virulent elements of a dead strain of a virus we are now presumably immune to and attach it to a modern strain we are not immune to.

21 posted on 10/31/2003 12:48:03 PM PST by GluteusMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"We actually ARE all gonna die."

Yeah, but I wanna pony first!

22 posted on 10/31/2003 12:48:35 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Ping.
23 posted on 10/31/2003 12:49:13 PM PST by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GluteusMax
This seems like one of those 'not good' ideas.
24 posted on 10/31/2003 12:50:16 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GluteusMax
But there is little need for antiviral drugs against the 1918 strain if the 1918 strain had not been recreated in the first place...

The 1918 virus is already "out of the bottle." It wasn't recreated, it was found in in bodies in permafrost. And there is no reason on earth why it, or something like it, couldn't come back. And if it does, and we haven't done any research on it, what does the Sunshine Project propose to tell the survivors?

25 posted on 10/31/2003 12:52:32 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
No kidding. This is insanity.

I can't say that I agree. The quoted language--"It simply does not make any scientific sense to create a new threat just to develop new countermeasures against it"--is too cute. It assumes that noone else can accomplish the same thing as the researchers did. But if the researchers can do it, so can NK, China and Iran. Don't you think it would be a good idea to understand the genome of this killer for countermeasures?

I have no doubt a few of the more developed totalitarian regimes could duplicate this kind of research. However, unless a western nation supplied the tissue samples, i.e. knew precisely where to exhume a soldier buried in permafrost, I find it somewhat unlikely that North Korea would embark on finding 1918 flu to work with. Ebola or something equally heinous perhaps would be more readily exploited. The choice of weaponizing Spanish Flu just seems strange for "terrorists" but does sound more plausible for a Western government to choose. Not to deny the possibility that OBL or someone may not see the usefulness of weaponized 1918 flu, but we shouldn't do the groundwork for him.

26 posted on 10/31/2003 12:58:40 PM PST by GluteusMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
Eventually a flu similar to the 1918 strain will appear again, that is a certainty. Knowing why the strain is so deadly may help fight it when it shows up, then again, I don't see why we wouldn't just develop a vaccine against it like we do for other flu.

What is really scary is that there were 2 efforts in the 90's of scientists trying to get samples of this virus from victims buried in permafrost. These yahoos were doing this with little protective equipment or containment facilites. Just a couple of scientists working alone. If they had found live virus they might have started another outbreak that could have killed millions.
27 posted on 10/31/2003 12:59:01 PM PST by BadAndy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grizzfan; CathyRyan; Mother Abigail; Dog Gone; Petronski; per loin; riri; flutters; Judith Anne; ...
I wonder how dangerous this strain is. Isn't it likely that current or recent strains of flu are related to it, so that most people have substantial immunity to it?
28 posted on 10/31/2003 12:59:08 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GluteusMax
But there is little need for antiviral drugs against the 1918 strain if the 1918 strain had not been recreated in the first place "It simply does not make any scientific sense to create a new threat just to develop new countermeasures against it."

No kidding. This is insanity.

Fine, but what if the Chinese or worse North Koreans reconstruct the 1918 virus? Plus we also have learned about another weapon, then we can create a vacination against it so only our enemy dies.

29 posted on 10/31/2003 1:06:11 PM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Much of the research on the original flu points to it having jumped from swine, to birds, to humans. Sound familiar? (SARS) That's why this research is vital - it will happen again without man's intervention - this way we can be prepared.
30 posted on 10/31/2003 1:07:24 PM PST by 11B3 (Use the Gitmo prisoners for bayonnet course target dummies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
There are 64 variants of the Orthomyxo virus that causes the flu. One variant causes the Spanish Flu. There is a phenomenon called the "Original Antigenic Sin" that means that your immunological system cannot tell the difference between small drifts of the viral antigen, meaning that if a person was first exposed to an orthomyxo, if it is close to another strain you produce antibody to the first one you were exposed. Now if there is a significant shift, antibody will not be formed to the strain anyway. One has a 1 in 64 chance of being immune to the strain that is currently being passed around. The vaccine is a prediction to the specific strain that is guessed to occur this year. In other words, fat chance to cross immunity.
31 posted on 10/31/2003 1:09:46 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
PING!!!
32 posted on 10/31/2003 1:09:53 PM PST by 11B3 (Use the Gitmo prisoners for bayonnet course target dummies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"Captain Trips"
33 posted on 10/31/2003 1:11:15 PM PST by Slicksadick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GluteusMax
I don't understand why a western nation would have to supply a tissue sample. The Spanish Flu like most flu's went world wide. Even if not, I am sure there are some samples of this flu somewhere else in this world.
34 posted on 10/31/2003 1:13:30 PM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy
Pretty sure the virus was long dead. Can't die from or spread a dead virus. What they did was to take the DNA from the virus and create new virus from it.

Did you know you can clone a dead person? Creepy!
35 posted on 10/31/2003 1:17:05 PM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I can understand the desire to study this bug from a public health point of view, but at the same time it is the perfect "poor man's nuke" and would arguably be devastating if released into the public once again.
36 posted on 10/31/2003 1:19:38 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GluteusMax
you are assuming that the muslims do not have
unofficial sponsorship from one of the bigger countries:
china, russia,...

china has always wanted to replace the US as the dominant
power, and they may succeed if we are always distracted
with the muslims.

Is it not ironic that we did the same thing to the
the Soviets in afghanistan and now it is happening to us.

37 posted on 10/31/2003 1:29:13 PM PST by vp_cal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy; David Hunter; Jim Noble
Ping!
38 posted on 10/31/2003 1:31:53 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vp_cal
You make a good point. China would be the most likely suspect in supplying bioweapons. Unless we have specific intelligence that they are weaponizing 1918 flu however, why would be resurrecting it? Also, if we did have specific intelligence that 1918 was being weaponized for use against us, you and me would not be reading about our counter efforts. It would be conducted in DOD labs, not by some yahoos in the private sector. The whole thing seems odd.
39 posted on 10/31/2003 1:38:28 PM PST by GluteusMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Montfort
"...In short, there could be a very good reason for pursuing this line of research. "

And further who is to say that research on a killer flu like this would not provide knowledge to combat other such outbreaks, or similar things like SARS.

Sounds like more US military baiting to me.
40 posted on 10/31/2003 1:50:09 PM PST by battousai (What's the only thing more irrelavent than a RAT presidential candidate?.....France of course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson