To: FairOpinion
It's obvious it was always only about money for Terri's husband.What happened with the lawsuit money? It's not like she's hooked up to any expensive machines. He should be given a divorce freed of any financial obligations except what he should pay back to her from the lawsuit money ----- I don't think he spent all that money on her care.
11 posted on
11/02/2003 10:15:20 AM PST by
FITZ
To: FITZ
I have no idea about community property laws in FL, but I think everyone may be forgetting that possibility. for those who can't understand why he doesn't just walk away, it may just be those self same community property laws. Terri may just be entitled to half of everything he owns, including the new house he bought with "his" half of the settlement money. Understand it has a pool and he drives a BMW.
52 posted on
11/02/2003 11:19:32 AM PST by
texaslil
To: FITZ
"I don't think he spent all that money on her care." No, he didn't. He paid it to the smarmy lawyer who is trying to get her killed....with the court's blessing of course. Judge Greer thought it was just fine for him to spend the money awarded specifically for Terri's rehabilitation on fees to the agent of death, while Medicaid pays the hospice bill. And seeing how she is not now, nor has she ever been terminal, she shouldn't have ever been accepted to hospice to begin with, but thanks to the good ol' boy network in Pinellas Country, laws are merely inconveniences to be stepped around.
77 posted on
11/02/2003 12:55:55 PM PST by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson