Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Impeach Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
The Washington Times ^ | 10-20-03 | Greg Pierce

Posted on 11/04/2003 4:25:10 PM PST by auggy

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor aborts the U.S. Constitution; impeachable offense? In an unprecedented show of arrogance against America and the United States Constitution, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a speech that she and her colleagues on the Supreme Court are going to increasingly rely on international law rather than looking to the U.S. Constitution , Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a speech that she and her colleagues on the Supreme Court are going to increasingly rely on international law rather than looking to the U.S. Constitution as they make their decisions. Disregarding her oath of office that she will uphold the U.S. Constitution seems to be an impeachable offense. In the infamous "Lawrence v. Texas" sodomy case this year, Mrs. O'Connor said the majority on the court used European legal precedent in making their rogue decision. And worse yet, she said that "Over time, we will rely increasingly on international and foreign courts in examining domestic issues." The Christian Coalition of America calls on Congress to begin reining in these arrogant renegade judges, and dealing with Justice O'Connor would be a good place to begin.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aborts; arrogance; constitution; courts; foreign; impeach; impeachscotus; oconnor; transjudicialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: davidosborne
"Please call YOUR congresscritter and INSIST that action be taken against "Justice" O'Connor..."

I have already emailed them. I plan on calling them next.

O'Connor and the ,"others", that agree with her need to be taken down. There seems to be alot of people doing what I am doing. I believe it may happen.

61 posted on 11/05/2003 5:10:07 PM PST by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: auggy
We (FReepers) Have the numbers to make it happen believe me.. if everyone just did their part and called thier congressman something will be done... Make them do thier jobs and VOTE that is all we can ask.. if they don't vote the way you think they should then get involved in the campaign of someone who does..... If we continue to let our elected representatives get away with NOT voting then we are only hurting ourselves...

David C. Osborne

62 posted on 11/05/2003 5:19:12 PM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: auggy
Sandra Day O'Connor, subtitled "What Hath Reagan and Kenneth Starr Wrought!"

I favor the impeachment of all six liberal justices by the House. It takes only a majority vote to impeach. We could start with O'Connor, based on her latest outburst of silly comments. Just having the word "impeachment" on her record would deeply wound that pround and arrogant AZ woman. Obviously, the McCainiac Senate would never vote to convict, but getting her labeled with the "I" word is worth a lot in the PR battle.
63 posted on 11/05/2003 5:29:00 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auggy
There was a time, long ago, when O'Conner respected the US Constitution.
But she is clearly getting old and feeble-minded; going downhill fast.
Somebody who cares for her needs to convince her to step away.
64 posted on 11/05/2003 5:33:24 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
agreed !!
65 posted on 11/05/2003 5:39:13 PM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: auggy
You are correct. They serve for life, unless they are impeached. I believe they can be.

Of course they can be impeached. Wasn't Abe Fortas impeached, or did he quit before he could be?

66 posted on 11/05/2003 5:39:19 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
thanks for the ping
67 posted on 11/05/2003 6:35:48 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
My thoughts exctly.
68 posted on 11/06/2003 3:07:15 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
David,
Please go back and really read my original post. My Congresscritter is Tom Feeney!

Ravenstar
69 posted on 11/06/2003 4:58:41 AM PST by Ravenstar (Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: auggy
"In the infamous "Lawrence v. Texas" sodomy case this year, Mrs. O'Connor said the majority on the court used European legal precedent in making their rogue decision."

=============================================================================================

"The question is or at least ought to be, how can such a small, godless, minority have such influence over our courts and legislative processes?"

Answer:

U.S. Supreme Court, 2003 - The Oligarchy*

Justices of the Supreme Court

Back Row (left to right): Ginsburg, Souter, Thomas, Breyer
Front Row (left to right): Scalia, Stevens, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy

ol•i•gar•chy
Pronunciation: 'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
Date: 1542
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under oligarchic control

70 posted on 11/06/2003 5:18:57 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Nurture terrorism in a neighborhood near you - donate to your local community mosque.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar
I see you did mention that...
71 posted on 11/06/2003 5:47:40 AM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
More needs to be done on this front. We need to take it to these people and tell them we will not stand for this ignoring of the Constitution. The "European 6" need to be impeached or the Constitutional Republic is dead. I am a Florida Type. I would like to see a group of us get together and bring our grievances about the European 6 to each of our representatives offices. This needs to get moving or lethargy will kill it.

Ravenstar
72 posted on 11/06/2003 6:51:40 AM PST by Ravenstar (Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
" "In the infamous "Lawrence v. Texas" sodomy case this year, Mrs. O'Connor said the majority on the court used European legal precedent in making their rogue decision." ============================================================================================= "

I guess one could say, at least, she is honest. It's almost ,as if, she is welcoming impeachment. Most likely, she is too arrogant to realize her treasonous remarks.

73 posted on 11/06/2003 8:37:53 AM PST by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
"Of course they can be impeached. Wasn't Abe Fortas impeached, or did he quit before he could be."

I would have to ask Google about that one.

74 posted on 11/06/2003 8:41:00 AM PST by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: auggy
Y'all might want to correct the grammar and spelling in it before you hit Send.
75 posted on 11/06/2003 8:41:18 AM PST by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auggy
I hate to say this, but the only way this gets any traction is if, and this is opinion, Scalia initiates this through the WH.

He's going to have to walk in to the Oval Office and say, "This needs to be dealt with."

If not Scalia, you'll have to find a Senator or very powerful House member to take this to GWB.

If GWB makes it an issue, it will be an issue.

Right now, the base will vote R despite O'Connor.

I suspect that this will get more traction after Nov 2004. If the Senate and House pickups are as predicted, then it will be a different ball game, and R strategy will shift to preventing legislation by judicial activism, which will literally be the only avenue left to D's in terms of their influence.
76 posted on 11/06/2003 8:43:16 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Thanks, David for your support.

This is one of the most serious crimes in a century.

It only proves how far and how deep we are in trouble, as a country. People like O'Connor and the rest of the Supreme's , are anti-America. Just like all of the Democrats.

No matter what you call them, Communists, Nazis, Socialists, or Liberals, they hate America and want it changed to whatever they have been brainwashed to believe.

77 posted on 11/06/2003 8:48:55 AM PST by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: auggy
The RATS want to lead us into socialism.

The USSC want to lead us into totalariansim.

78 posted on 11/06/2003 8:57:58 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Nurture terrorism in a neighborhood near you - donate to your local community mosque.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: auggy
Will do.

Thanks
79 posted on 11/06/2003 9:28:40 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar
Let's Roll !!!
80 posted on 11/06/2003 2:14:52 PM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson