Skip to comments.
EMERGENCY! DEMS WINNING THIS FRIST POLL! NEEDS IMMEDIATE FREEPING!
Frist Website! ^
| 11-12-03
| Bob J
Posted on 11/12/2003 4:26:38 PM PST by Bob J
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Rome2000
Bump
21
posted on
11/12/2003 4:47:11 PM PST
by
hope
To: Let's Roll
Doesn't that mean the poll is biased?
22
posted on
11/12/2003 4:47:56 PM PST
by
halfdome
To: hope
bunch of lying perverted evil baby killing murderous socialist subhuman foul smelling beastsI left out that they are unpatriotic un-American leftist racist pond scum
23
posted on
11/12/2003 4:50:14 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(McCarthy was right!)
To: farmfriend
Here's to hoping I get banned from DU ... can't believe their rules say they ban conservatives!
24
posted on
11/12/2003 4:50:15 PM PST
by
nuzman
To: nuzman
I've been tempted to sign up just to see how long I would last.
25
posted on
11/12/2003 4:51:15 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Bob J
No: 63%
Yes: 37%
Votes: 5052
I'm just surprised at how many Democrats are opposed to the democratic process...not to mention the Constitution. Charles Schumer single-handidly changed the rules of judicial review/advise and consent when he "publically" announced an ideological litmus test for appointees.
26
posted on
11/12/2003 4:52:04 PM PST
by
cwb
(.)
To: Bob J
just another bump
27
posted on
11/12/2003 4:53:04 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: farmfriend
| |
|
| Should the Senate exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote? |
6016 Total Votes
|
|
|
|
| |
28
posted on
11/12/2003 4:53:32 PM PST
by
easonc52
To: farmfriend
The postings over there are bizarre.
Foul language, moronic leftist drivel and cospiracy theories.
29
posted on
11/12/2003 4:54:14 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(McCarthy was right!)
To: cwboelter
Someone's voting...it's now:
Y-47%
N-53%
V-7684
30
posted on
11/12/2003 4:55:42 PM PST
by
cwb
(.)
To: Bob J
Voted and bumped!
To: padfoot_lover
I voted but it won't let me vote a second time. After one vote, all I can get are results, not a voting chance.
32
posted on
11/12/2003 4:57:30 PM PST
by
speedy
To: Bob J
50/50
33
posted on
11/12/2003 4:57:37 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: Bob J
Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?
Yes:
50%
No:
50%
8404 total votes
34
posted on
11/12/2003 4:57:38 PM PST
by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
To: Bob J
Done - at 50/50. Bump.
35
posted on
11/12/2003 4:57:41 PM PST
by
Lando Lincoln
(God Bless the arsenal of liberty.)
To: cwboelter
Wow...50-50 with 8397 accounted.
36
posted on
11/12/2003 4:58:03 PM PST
by
cwb
(.)
To: Bob J
The question is worded kind of oddly.
Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?I wonder if the word "from" was intended to be there.
To: Bob J
Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?
Yes:
51%
No:
50%
8587 total votes
38
posted on
11/12/2003 4:58:34 PM PST
by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
To: Bob J
It is now at 50-50.
Keep Freepin!
39
posted on
11/12/2003 4:58:59 PM PST
by
Jacvin
To: Bob J
FReeped. 50-50
40
posted on
11/12/2003 4:59:01 PM PST
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson