1 posted on
11/12/2003 4:26:39 PM PST by
Bob J
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Bob J
Bumpin' this ... someone out there is inflating this poll on the other side.
2 posted on
11/12/2003 4:29:11 PM PST by
nuzman
To: Bob J
Ok! BTW do you have any Latex Gloves I could have? I hate Dem Bleeders.....
3 posted on
11/12/2003 4:30:29 PM PST by
cmsgop
( "Love For Sale",.."Yummy Appetizing Love For Sale")
To: Bob J
Bob J, I went in there and freeped, but then it wouldn't let me leave via my back button. So I had to vote two more times, just to get back to FR. Honest. Really.
(Thanks for the heads up. :)
5 posted on
11/12/2003 4:31:20 PM PST by
Humidston
(Two Words: TERM LIMITS)
To: Bob J
Looks like DU has been busy!
Let them have their poll - as if a poll which change anything.
7 posted on
11/12/2003 4:33:43 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(America .. the LIGHT of the World)
To: Bob J
Freeped and bumped.
8 posted on
11/12/2003 4:33:50 PM PST by
Jacvin
To: Bob J
Didnt that lying bastard say that over 10,000 had voted?
What a rat.
9 posted on
11/12/2003 4:33:54 PM PST by
RWR8189
To: Bob J
FReeped
10 posted on
11/12/2003 4:35:21 PM PST by
cgk
(Kraut, 1989: We must brace ourselves for disquisitions on peer pressure, adolescent anomie & rage.)
To: Bob J
68% No
32% Yes
This "poll" has to be rigged.
To: Bob J
triple "windows washer' Freep and bump.
14 posted on
11/12/2003 4:37:02 PM PST by
Jacvin
To: Bob J
Voted and a bump to you.
16 posted on
11/12/2003 4:39:00 PM PST by
Techster
To: Bob J
That bunch of lying perverted evil baby killing murderous socialist subhuman foul smelling beasts that troll DUmmy.com are not going to win this one.
We have the numbers and God on our side.
They sit on Satans shoulder.
18 posted on
11/12/2003 4:40:16 PM PST by
Rome2000
(McCarthy was right!)
To: Bob J
bttt
19 posted on
11/12/2003 4:40:37 PM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Bob J
No: 63%
Yes: 37%
Votes: 5052
I'm just surprised at how many Democrats are opposed to the democratic process...not to mention the Constitution. Charles Schumer single-handidly changed the rules of judicial review/advise and consent when he "publically" announced an ideological litmus test for appointees.
26 posted on
11/12/2003 4:52:04 PM PST by
cwb
(.)
To: Bob J
just another bump
27 posted on
11/12/2003 4:53:04 PM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Bob J
Voted and bumped!
To: Bob J
50/50
33 posted on
11/12/2003 4:57:37 PM PST by
Arkinsaw
To: Bob J
Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?
Yes:
50%
No:
50%
8404 total votes
34 posted on
11/12/2003 4:57:38 PM PST by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
To: Bob J
Done - at 50/50. Bump.
35 posted on
11/12/2003 4:57:41 PM PST by
Lando Lincoln
(God Bless the arsenal of liberty.)
To: Bob J
The question is worded kind of oddly.
Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?I wonder if the word "from" was intended to be there.
To: Bob J
Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?
Yes:
51%
No:
50%
8587 total votes
38 posted on
11/12/2003 4:58:34 PM PST by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson