Skip to comments.
Surveillance of Scott Peterson's home takes center stage
CNN.com/Law center ^
| Thursday, November 13, 2003 Posted: 5:46 AM EST (1046 GMT
Posted on 11/13/2003 5:29:30 AM PST by runningbear
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 461-469 next last
To: BunnySlippers
Well you can bet there won't be any eyewitnesses called here. The shreds of clothing found on Laci's body are shreds of the clothing she was wearing when she left the hair salon with Snott on the evening of Dec. 23rd. That fact alone clears the deck of eyewitnesses since every one of them said she was wearing what Snott said she was wearing.
81
posted on
11/13/2003 1:30:53 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: runningbear
Thanks RB.
Maybe tomorrow we will hear from Amber.
82
posted on
11/13/2003 1:38:56 PM PST
by
clouda
(terrisfight.org)
To: Diver Dave
Thank you, again! You are the best!!!
Regards,
maggie
83
posted on
11/13/2003 1:40:17 PM PST
by
maggief
To: clouda
That's what I heard clouda. Tomorrow for Amber because there was too much to do yet with the lead Detective.
84
posted on
11/13/2003 1:44:10 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: clouda; All
Reported on MSNBC by San Goldman that the DA will not call Amber to testify at the preliminary hearing.
85
posted on
11/13/2003 1:44:29 PM PST
by
iaf97
To: Canadian Outrage; texasbluebell
Remember back in Feb. when the Rocha's asked everyone to please use the police tip line at their press conference. They also put this on their website. Anyone in the Peterson clan that discarded information should be charged. All of them were on TV asking people to call their "tip line".
The public is asked not to use the toll-free telephone tip line established by Scott Peterson and his family. All leads and tips regarding Laci Peterson's disappearance should be directed to the tip line that is operated by the Modesto Police Department
86
posted on
11/13/2003 1:49:20 PM PST
by
clouda
(terrisfight.org)
To: iaf97
Oh no!!!!!
I have always said she would be the key, but if it helps convict Scotty to wait until trial, I'm all for it.
87
posted on
11/13/2003 1:52:24 PM PST
by
clouda
(terrisfight.org)
To: All; drjulie
"They just reported on Court TV that on redirect the detective stated that Scott purchased a fishing license on the 20th for the 23rd & 24th."I have been thinking about the fishing license and that Scott couldn't remember what he was fishing for but eventually said he was fishing for Sturgeon.
Now I don't know much about fishing but my son and son-in-law go quite often and it seems to me I have heard them say not only do you have to get a regular fishing license, but if you are going to fish for certain fish (and it seems to me Sturgeon was one of those) you have to get an additional license just for that type of fish.
88
posted on
11/13/2003 1:52:46 PM PST
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: clouda
You bet they should be charged. They are also complicit in his little false id name change, purchase of a different car that didn't have GPS downloaded in it and his run for the Border. The ENTIRE lot of them are guilty of aiding and abetting. Instructing girls to THROW AWAY any tip that incriminated Snotty is criminal in itself. And yes, I remember when the Laci site had that symbol and they said on TV not to call anything but the MPD tip line. Between you and me, I'd like to see the Sr. Peterson's CHARGED with a criminal offense.
89
posted on
11/13/2003 1:53:38 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Canadian Outrage
The ENTIRE lot of them are guilty of aiding and abetting. Yes!!!!!!!! I can't stand them!!
90
posted on
11/13/2003 1:58:24 PM PST
by
clouda
(terrisfight.org)
To: iaf97
Not calling Amber now is understandable. They really don't need anymore to bind him over for trial. In fact, if Peterson was smart, he'd be trying to deal right now. But being as he's a stoopid Jackass, he'll carry this all the way through until the rest of his family is bankrupt!! (Well they are already morally bankrupt but now he's going for the finacial) LOL
91
posted on
11/13/2003 1:59:58 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Jackie-O
Jackie-oooooooooooooooooooo!! Where are you?
Read post # 85.
92
posted on
11/13/2003 2:00:13 PM PST
by
clouda
(terrisfight.org)
To: clouda
Yeah, WHERE ARE ALL OUR SCOWS??
93
posted on
11/13/2003 2:00:57 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Canadian Outrage
Well they are already morally bankrupt but now he's going for the finacialLOL!!! Good one.
94
posted on
11/13/2003 2:01:05 PM PST
by
clouda
(terrisfight.org)
To: drjulie
"The detective called the Peterson tip line with a "tip" that incriminated Scott. The tip line never reported this to police!"Huh! I am not sure I understand this statement. Let me see if I have it or not.
The Peterson tip line was a tip line that went to Scott or his Family and the detective was just trying to see how honest they would be?
95
posted on
11/13/2003 2:03:03 PM PST
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: clouda
LOL - I would like to see the Peterson's faces today!! You think whacky Jackie is gonna be all smiles? uh-uh!!
96
posted on
11/13/2003 2:03:43 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Canadian Outrage
I should clarify that Goldman reported that "sources close to the prosecution" informed him that Amber won't be called at the prelim.
97
posted on
11/13/2003 2:05:52 PM PST
by
iaf97
To: Canadian Outrage
I don't know where everyone is.
CO, how about the fact that Scotty not only told Amber about his "dead" wife on the 9th, but also told Amber's friend, his wife was dead, on the 6th.
I'm like you, where do these TV "talking heads" get off saying there is no real evidence except the hair.
98
posted on
11/13/2003 2:06:23 PM PST
by
clouda
(terrisfight.org)
To: Spunky
You got it.
99
posted on
11/13/2003 2:07:57 PM PST
by
clouda
(terrisfight.org)
To: clouda
You know why it's good for Amber NOT to be used in the Prelim but in the trial itself? It's because in front of a jury Geragos and/or McAllister will NOT be able to rip her apart. It will backfire bigtime, PLUS they won't have any other transcript in which they could say, well in the Prelim you said this, and now your saying it differently!! That type thing but mostly in the Prelim they are allowed to be brutal but NOT the trial.
100
posted on
11/13/2003 2:08:18 PM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 461-469 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson