To: bondserv
I hate to say it, but it all depends on what the meaning of the word "day" is. If your beliefs (or metaphorical license) can bend the meaning of "day" to mean billions of years, then the creation story sort of works. But science says it "really" took billions of years.
5 posted on
11/15/2003 11:04:16 PM PST by
AZLiberty
(Where Arizona turns for dry humor)
To: AZLiberty
[5]
I hate to say it, but it all depends on what the meaning of the word "day" is. Yup. I'm curious.
How long were each of the first two days? There was no sun until the third day.
Genesis:
1:13 And the evening and the morning were the third day. 1: 14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
17 posted on
11/15/2003 11:35:22 PM PST by
Diddley
To: AZLiberty
Since Clinton I recoil at the word "is"; it's a shame.
I go with Einstein; God did not play dice with the universe.
To: AZLiberty
"if your beliefs (or metaphorical license) can bend the meaning of "day" to mean billions of years, then the creation story sort of works. But science says it "really" took billions of years." Lets flip that around somewhat. What if our understanding or definition of a year is all wrong?
79 posted on
11/16/2003 10:34:34 AM PST by
Mikey
To: AZLiberty
But science says it "really" took billions of years.Yeah, that's what science says. I don't think they know any more than anyone else. They look in telescopes, take measurements, etc. of the now, then presume what happened billions of years ago. A cosmic Ms. Cleo.
221 posted on
11/17/2003 7:25:31 AM PST by
MEGoody
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson