Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walter Reed Confirms Hillary's Visit - Sort Of
NewsMax ^ | 11/17/03 | Limbacher

Posted on 11/17/2003 3:54:32 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

We were skeptical Saturday night when New York Sen. Hillary Clinton told Iowa Democrats gathered at the Jefferson-Jackson Dinner that she'd spent Veteran's Day night at Washington, D.C.'s Walter Reed Army hospital comforting wounded soldiers just back from Iraq.

After all, there wasn't a single media report on the former first lady's Florence Nightingale moment. And even Walter Reed's in-house newspaper, which covered other visits by prominent congresspersons last week, made no mention of Mrs. Clinton's ministering to the troops.

Yet somehow nobody noticed as, by her own description, Sen. Clinton "went from room to room and bed to bed, seeing young men who had lost arms and legs, who had head injuries that, at least as for now, prevented them from knowing their names and remembering where they came from."

After blaming President Bush for the carnage, the former first lady told the crowd, "I knew that I was seeing the best that America has to offer."

A call to Walter Reed's public affairs office Monday morning cleared up the mystery - to some extent, anyway - over why nobody seemed to notice when the world's most famous woman materialized out of the blue to cheer up the troops.

Asked about Mrs. Clinton's visit, a hospital spokeswoman initially had no recollection of the episode, telling NewsMax.com, "Most of us were off for Veteran's Day."

But after some checking she returned to the line to confirm that the New York Senator had indeed made the pilgrimage, but did so on her own, without any entourage and without notifying the public affairs office.

When asked if Walter Reed was in the habit of admitting non-relatives, who hadn't cleared their visit with hospital authorities, to barge in and wander through the sick wards at will, the spokeswoman replied, "When you're the wife of the ex-president, yes."



TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; walterreed; wia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2003 3:54:32 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"After blaming President Bush for the carnage, the former first lady told the crowd, "I knew that I was seeing the best that America has to offer."

What next, will she show up at Dover to watch the boides come home, accompaneied by 500 photographers and news cameras, who will slip past the normal rule because they will be covering her, not the arrival of the bodies.

Buzzard.

2 posted on 11/17/2003 3:58:08 PM PST by Montfort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
but did so on her own, without any entourage

NOT a Chance that would ever happen!!!!

3 posted on 11/17/2003 3:58:53 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
That confirms it: she's running in 2004.
4 posted on 11/17/2003 4:02:09 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
That witch can comfort a porcupine.
5 posted on 11/17/2003 4:03:18 PM PST by cyborg (liberals are the tapeworms in the intestine of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A BLAST FROM THE PAST:

Hillary Gets Poll Boost as Child Advocate

"First Lady Leads Rudy," blared the Sunday New York Daily News headline, sitting atop the first report in recent memory showing Hillary Clinton pulling ahead of the New York mayor in a poll for the Empire State's U.S. Senate race.

The new poll is something of a shocker, since Rudy Giuliani has consistently led Mrs. Clinton in head-to-head match-ups for months.

And Hillary's lead is fairly impressive, with 47 percent preferring her, 39 percent for Rudy, among 805 registered New York voters surveyed last week.

The Daily News credited one issue above all others that works heavily in Mrs. Clinton's favor:

"The first lady is getting a lift from her well-known background as an advocate for children."

Well-known? Certainly. But well-deserved? She certainly talks the talk.

Still, Inside Cover can't help but recall one of the more disturbing reports to ever grace the pages of the American Spectator, which has unearthed more than its share of disturbing news during the Clinton years.

The Spectator had examined one of Mrs. Clinton's classic kiddie-compassion photo-ops, a January 1997 visit to the pediatrics ward at Georgetown University Medical Center.

The young patients were quite ill and looked it. Several were terminal cases. But word of Mrs. Clinton's visit had all of them delighted and thrilled. She was slated to lift their spirits by reading excerpts from author Maurice Sendak's "Where the Wild Things Are," his award-winning children's book. But, according to the Spectator:

"Alas, the first lady's advance team became squeamish about their boss appearing with kids who weren't looking 100 percent in the pink; in fact, hospital officials were told not to allow any children into the photo-op who were 'drowsy,' bald, bearing tubes in their bodies or 'sick looking.'"

Instead, perfectly healthy children of the hospital staff were ushered into a conference room, which had been redecorated as a playroom for the occasion. There the first lady got her photo-op as America's No. 1 child advocate, while the sick kids were left cooling their heels well outside of camera range.

One hospital source told the Spectator that the truly ill children were devastated, having concluded that Mrs. Clinton had deemed them "too sick to be seen" with her.

6 posted on 11/17/2003 4:08:44 PM PST by doug from upland (Why aren't the Clintons living out their remaining years on Alcatraz?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Related thread:

Hillary to Iowans: I Comforted Troops at Walter Reed

7 posted on 11/17/2003 4:10:49 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Walter Reed Confirms Hillary's Visit - Sort Of"

Maybe she just needed to get her prostate checked.

8 posted on 11/17/2003 4:11:22 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
But after some checking she returned to the line to confirm

OH NO. That's not good enough when it comes to confirming a clinton episode. We need NAMES. WHO did she check with? Sorry, but until I see a picture of a human with a name listed as actually having SEEN the succubus, I won't believe it.

9 posted on 11/17/2003 4:15:48 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Being a veteran, if she would have came into my room to comfort me, I would have ripped out the tubes and physically thrown her out with whatever strength I could muster, which probably would have happened in any scenario. Sounds like a fairy tale.

Blessings, bobo
10 posted on 11/17/2003 4:16:11 PM PST by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Montfort
What next, will she show up at Dover to watch the boides come home, accompaneied by 500 photographers and news cameras, who will slip past the normal rule because they will be covering her, not the arrival of the bodies.

What rule would prevent the old first lady from going to Dover AFB and taking a photo-op exploiting those that gave their lives for our nation?

12 posted on 11/17/2003 4:21:38 PM PST by jsbankston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A wounded soldier read about Hillary's visit in the newspapaper.

"She was really here? Thank God. I thought, in my delirium, that Satan had come to claim me."
13 posted on 11/17/2003 4:34:27 PM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
You're absolutely right. After the other candidates totally decimate each other, they won't even have the strength to stand up and wave when she comes clip-clopping down the aisle on her donkey to accept the nomination at the last minute -- untouched by debates, untouched by the media, untouched by willy, -- like a virgin queen ready and expecting her coronation.

As Michael Savage might say, 'Get ready for the 'she-ocracy.'

I think the only thing she has to consider is whether she should wait until '08, or hope that the dirty-tricks department will finish doing their thing on George Bush and chance opposing him in '04. I think greed, ego, and impatience will cause her to believe the polls and she'll opt for '04. You can sense her body is already trembling with orgasm in anticipation. (Her body being the demo-crazy party, of course. .... ahem).

14 posted on 11/17/2003 4:34:41 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
I believe that she will let the other candidates eat each other alive, probably resulting in Howard Dean getting the nomination. From what I have read, some of the Dims think Dean is unelectable. Imagine Saint Hillary waddling in to save the party.
15 posted on 11/17/2003 4:38:05 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
What did she go for to have a errant broom handle from her crotch?
16 posted on 11/17/2003 4:41:59 PM PST by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
LOL
17 posted on 11/17/2003 4:44:48 PM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Post of the month material, bill. LOL.
18 posted on 11/17/2003 4:46:00 PM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
NOT a Chance that would ever happen!!!!

It could. Anything is possible.

19 posted on 11/17/2003 4:50:24 PM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The primary reason why she would go without media- so a hostile confrontation wouldn't be recorded.
Typically Clinton takes no chances with media events getting out of control.

Of course she may have had a secondary reason for sneaking in though...
Is anything missing?

20 posted on 11/17/2003 4:54:01 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson