[ArGee]

There will be several people who will visit this thread to tell us it's none of government's business who has sex with whom.

There will be several who will tell us it is unreasonable to deny to some (gays) what others (straights) can have.

There will be several who will tell us that heterosexuals do all the same things that homosexuals do - it's only a difference of who they do it with.

And there will be several who will tell us it doesn't really matter whether people are born gay as long as they don't harm anyone else.

And when the documentation is supplied to show an agenda since the late 1980s to cause us to think in precisely these terms, those same people will laugh at the idea of a gay agenda.

We have been led like sheep. Now we get to find out whether we have been led to a shearing, or to a slaughter.

Shalom.

[international american]

You are so right! And Hollywood and much of tv is PROMOTING the Homo agenda with a vengeance!

[Roughneck]

>>>We have been led like sheep. Now we get to find out whether we have been led to a shearing, or to a slaughter<<<


Those of us who saw it coming didn't stand a chance did we? Now, we must make a stand.

Amen

[NYer]

And when the documentation is supplied to show an agenda since the late 1980s to cause us to think in precisely these terms, those same people will laugh at the idea of a gay agenda.

"We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of you shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all-male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us. Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep."

Homosexual Manifesto

[Kuksool]

If gays want the right to marry, then we should allow the Northeasten states to break away from the USA and join with Canada.

[scripter]

And when the documentation is supplied to show an agenda since the late 1980s to cause us to think in precisely these terms, those same people will laugh at the idea of a gay agenda.

Speaking of the homosexual agenda, the following documents how they try to manipulate us into accepting their behavior:

• The Homosexual Propaganda and Media Manipulation Game 

And here's their platform from 1972, 1987, 1993 and 2000:

• Homosexual Agenda Platforms from 1972 - 2000 

Of course the documentation needs to list how homosexuals have targeted children:

• Targeting Children, Part 1: How the gay movement intends to capture the next generation 
• Targeting Children, Part 2: How the homosexual movement uses public schools as instruments of change 
• Targeting Children, Part 3: Activists encouraging experimentation 
• Targeting Children, Part 4: Access to children: homosexuality and molestation 

There's a lot more documentation available.

I'll be gone until Thursday so please don't think I'm ignoring your pings - hopefully EdReform has some time available to ping the list.

[Greybird]

There will be several people who will visit this thread to tell us it's none of government's business who has sex with whom.

That has been openly maintained for over a century and a half. Get a clue. (Lysander Spooner brought this up in the 1870s in "Vices Are Not Crimes.")

And when the documentation is supplied to show an agenda since the late 1980s to cause us to think in precisely these terms, those same people will laugh at the idea of a gay agenda.

To "cause us to think"? Utterly absurd, unless one endorses your view of humans being sheep, rather than the possessors of rational minds. With most discussions of media bias -- which is undeniable -- that, unfortunately, is the reigning assumption around here.

Beyond that, these issues have been brought up in vigorous public discussion for at least 35 years (albeit initially in academe), not 15 years. As with almost all conspiracy theories, the "gay agenda" line both proclaims the omnipotence to effect change of those actively involved, and suggests that such actions are transparent enough so as to not genuinely persuade anyone. Such contradictions, however, do not exist.

In any event, bibliographies are not arguments -- and those alleging an "agenda" are notorious for not putting their names on their own connected and logical cases for this. All we've had are any number of religious screeds that openly discard rational standards, in favor of (supposed) biblical and other proclamations.

That's not enough for genuine discourse ... but few want that, anyway, when simply averring that "homos threaten the culture" is so much easier.