Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhiKapMom
I just went on-air with Jerry Agar (50,000 watts - WPTF, Raleigh) to discuss the ramifications of this decision. Bottom line, I said it will probably be reversed by passage of the proposed US Constition amendment to define marriage as a union of "one man and one woman." Further, I said that President Bush will support this amendment, and all the Democrat candidates will be forced to oppose it, with the result of putting the Democrat nominee -- whoever it is -- further behind the political eight-ball.

Looks like it is playing out that way, though notice the weasel-statement by Kerry who says he "opposes" homosexual marriage but "supports equal rights" for homosexual couples. If he keeps waffling like that, folks will start confusing him with Wesley Clark. LOL.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Double Crossing at the Rio Grande," discussion thread. IF YOU WANT A FREEPER IN CONGRESS, CLICK HERE.

18 posted on 11/18/2003 3:15:45 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
Good summary.
23 posted on 11/18/2003 3:18:56 PM PST by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
This is a hypothetical question, which I see as an outcome of this decision, and I haven't seen it asked, but it may have. I haven't read all the posts regarding this decision.

If, states pass this decision, it is in direct conflict with the teachings of the majority of religions. If a gay couple demands a religious demoniation marry them (church cermony), and that religion refuses, based upon their teachings, will the government intervene and tell the church they have to marry them, is this a direct violation of the first amendment?

36 posted on 11/18/2003 3:28:49 PM PST by Indy Pendance (Don't sweat the petty . . . pet the sweaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
I said it will probably be reversed by passage of the proposed US Constition amendment to define marriage as a union of "one man and one woman." Further, I said that President Bush will support this amendment, and all the Democrat candidates will be forced to oppose it, with the result of putting the Democrat nominee -- whoever it is -- further behind the political eight-ball.

This is exactly what I thought when I heard this had passed.This is now going to sharply divide the democrats that have a conscience, and I am sure many will have to make some hard decisions!!!!!

84 posted on 11/18/2003 4:01:48 PM PST by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
Wish I could have heard that exchange. Your following comment was well stated and IMHO it says it all:

"Further, I said that President Bush will support this amendment, and all the Democrat candidates will be forced to oppose it, with the result of putting the Democrat nominee -- whoever it is -- further behind the political eight-ball."
200 posted on 11/18/2003 7:40:19 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson