Inside the Beltway - Treason's cousin

The Washington Times ^ | November 19, 2003 | John McCaslin

[Chad Fairbanks]

Because news outlets like to remind President Bush how many American servicemen have died since he declared an "end" to major combat in Iraq, a new military and intelligence-themed Internet site spells out reasons for the current U.S. deployment.

"America is at war," reminds IntelMemo.com. "We are at war against the network of international terrorists who committed the mass murders of September 11th. We are at war against the survivors of Saddam Hussein's regime and against the remnants of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Americans have died and continue to die in this struggle."

[Xthe17th]

I notice that ProtestWarrior.com gets more attention than the DC Chapter of FR in local news. Why? Because they have a good website, print T-shirts, and market themselves!

This is the key to getting our messages out. WEBSITES!! MEGA KUDOS to the FRN for putting this site together and BIG BUMP to encourage other such message sites.

[deport]

Don't forget the new site launched by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) that provides an unfiltered look at free Iraq.

Freedom.gov

[Quilla]

Sen. Miller's terminology makes me think of treason's second cousin?

[Mo1]

It's about time they start to notice

[Chad Fairbanks]

Thank you, everyone, for the pings, bumps and comments. I'm not able to reply to each of you individually right now (not at home - preparing for a meeting), but I wanted to just thank everyone , and let you all know that I'm not ignoring you!

[null and void]

Don't put that in your mouth! You don't know where it's been!!!

Oh. You do?

*nevermind*

[Darksheare]

Yes.
But there are some that need to be called 'infidel' to their faces to understand it.
And even then, some of them will continue to believe that if they just cooperate, everything will be fine.

[Quilla]

Shoot nully, the whole world knows. Here, have a fry and get the taste out of your mouth.

[Lady Jag]

What breed of dog do you want?

Doxie back there is a great Ratter!

[Lady Jag]

BWAHAHAHA!
Wrong thread to post the dog defense to?

Maybe not.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

NOW look what you started!

(Very cool stuff, Chad!)

[Windshark]

This is the Washington times...

It's still only conservatives who read conservative news sources that know about this....

[jmstein7]

BUMP!

[Lady Jag]

All ya gotta do is serve one Democrat a night

Before you know it

No more leftovers!

[talleyman]

Neander-con Bump!

[reformed_democrat]

What kind of dog it that? I think his first cousin (same face, same coloring, smaller ears) is living at my house.

[Lady Jag]

That's a blood hound. Yours has smaller ears? Is it a beagle?

[Chad Fairbanks]

Thanks, Talleyman!

[MeekOneGOP]

Inside the Beltway - Treason's cousin

From the link within your article, Chad Fairbanks.
Thanks for the post and ping, folks ! ...

America is at war.

We are at war against the network of international terrorists who committed the mass murders of 9/11. We are at war against the survivors of Saddam Hussein's regime, and against the remnants of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Americans have died, and continue to die in this struggle.

The leadership of the Democratic Party is also at war.

However, their war is against President George W. Bush. And this war is the highest priority of Democratic decision-makers -- even within the traditionally nonpartisan Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

On November 5, 2003, Americans were given an unprecedented look inside the Democrats' war, when Fox News published an astoundingly revealing memorandum from within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, describing how Democrats on the Committee intend to use their positions, influence, and access to information - not to help win the war on terror, or to protect American citizens - but to undermine the Bush Administration. The memo describes their agreement to launch an "independent investigation" as a means to that end, timed to coincide with the 2004 presidential campaign.

The purpose of a real investigation, of course, is to gather information, analyze it, and arrive at a conclusion. But the memo makes it clear that the Democrats on the Intelligence Committee have already reached their conclusions. This "investigation" is a sham, intended purely to support and publicize their political agenda.

By signing onto this scheme, the Democratic members of the Senate Committee on Intelligence have abused their positions, undercut American troops and agents in the field, and violated their oaths of office.

This must not stand.

Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.

[MeekOneGOP]

THIS is the link I was referring to:

IntelMemo.com