Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Internet Access Tax Battle Heats Up in Senate
Rueters ^ | 11/20/2003 19:40 | Rueters

Posted on 11/21/2003 12:16:29 PM PST by .cnI redruM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. senator said on Thursday that he would hold up a massive year-end spending bill if it included a ban on Internet-access taxes that he and several colleagues fear would harm state and local finances.

Delaware Sen. Thomas Carper, a Democrat, told reporters he would try to keep the omnibus bill from coming to the Senate floor if the ban was included in its present form, which he said infringed on the rights of state and local governments to raise revenues.

"If we end up with just an awful ... provision I would certainly object to bringing the omnibus spending bill to the floor and I suspect others will join me," Carper told reporters after a news briefing on the issue.

Although Senate rules offer many ways for individual senators to hold up bills they disagree with, it would be hard for Carper to do more than delay the bill for a few days.

Colleagues said they hoped to reach a deal with lawmakers on the other side of the issue before matters reached a head.

The ban is meant to replace a 1998 moratorium that kept state and local government from imposing taxes on the monthly fees Internet providers such as EarthLink Inc (ELNK). charge their customers. The moratorium expired on Nov. 1.

As written, the replacement measure would permanently ban those taxes as well as taxes on high-speed cable and DSL services not covered under the original moratorium.

The new version, which cleared the House of Representatives in September, would also eliminate access taxes that were in place in some states before 1998. Senate leaders brought the bill to the floor several weeks ago but pulled it back after it became apparent the measure might not pass easily.

BROADLY WORDED BILL

State and local governments fear the legislation is worded so broadly that it would restrict them from collecting all manner of other taxes on the telecommunications industry.

They say it could cost them as much as $9 billion in tax revenues a year by 2006 as phone calls, music sales and other activities migrate to the Internet.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates these jurisdictions would lose $195 million that year but said the true cost of the provision could not be determined and could be much higher.

Calling the ban proposal an unfunded mandate on states and a massive tax break for the telecommunications industry, Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee said he and his colleagues had proposed a compromise two-year ban.

The compromise would ban access taxes both on DSL and in states previously allowed to tax Internet access services.

He said there was also a chance that the two sides could simply agree to extending the terms of the expired moratorium for a few months while they agreed on what should come afterward.

But Virginia Republican Sen. George Allen, whose state boasts a large high-tech business community and who supports the permanent ban proposal, said he could not accept an extension either for a few months or two years.

"Senator Allen does not believe a two-year extension provides either consumers or businesses with adequate stability to plan future significant buildout of broadband," his spokesman said, adding that Allen's goal was to keep industry costs down to make Internet access affordable for all.

A spokeswoman for Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat, said Wyden was similarly unmoved by proposals presented thus far. Extension of the terms of the previous ban simply gave states more time to institute new taxes on the Internet, she said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: internettax
Here's an interesting alliance. Wyden and Allen are teaming up to block an internet tax permanently. Of course, Thomas Carper (D - Buearocratia)will filibuster.

Way to go Democrats. Raise taxes, raise the costs associated w/ high technology and send that industry running to China or Japan. That ought to give Howard Dean enough unemployment to win an election with!

1 posted on 11/21/2003 12:16:29 PM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
First should shut down the Senate until after the election and have Bush go ahead with judicial appointments.
2 posted on 11/21/2003 12:19:45 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Delaware Sen. Thomas Carper, a Democrat, told reporters he would try to keep the omnibus bill from coming to the Senate floor if the ban was included in its present form, which he said infringed on the rights of state and local governments to raise revenues.

Uh........the "right" of the government trumps the "right" of the people? Good thing they said he was a Democrat. I'd hate to have the readers miss that part.

3 posted on 11/21/2003 12:23:54 PM PST by concerned about politics ( "Satire". It's Just "Satire.".......So it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Keep the internet tax ban in place. Free correspondence is great.
4 posted on 11/21/2003 12:25:51 PM PST by Abram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Abram
Free correspondence is great.

It's really the only real freedom we have left. We colonists have discovered and conquered a new land. We've named it cyberspace.
Now the kings of the earth are trying to tax this one out of existance, too.

5 posted on 11/21/2003 12:31:22 PM PST by concerned about politics ( "Satire". It's Just "Satire.".......So it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Ah, yes! Democrats! Nothing is too sacred to tax.

But the truth is that democrats and lefties don't much care for the internet. In it's bewginning the dems thought the internet was going to be a great tool for their cause. It was going to be great for the masses to communicate and come to a common conclusion that liberalism is the law of the land. Their monitors were steam-covered from the heat of passion for the chance to solidify their goals.

It wasn't until the steam evaporated that they were able to see the ugly truth. The internet is a great tool alright, but not for the task they have at hand. The great masses don't lean their way. The internet is a freedom in the wrong hands and now it is on The List of things the lefties must silence. They would love to see it taxed to death.
6 posted on 11/21/2003 12:44:23 PM PST by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
But the truth is that democrats and lefties don't much care for the internet. In it's bewginning the dems thought the internet was going to be a great tool for their cause

You know you're a red neck if....

Your whole family is Democrats 'cept for lil Mary. She got ta readin'.

7 posted on 11/21/2003 12:48:50 PM PST by concerned about politics ( "Satire". It's Just "Satire.".......So it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
I hadn't even considered the Machiavellian aspects of this. I was too busy being a righteously indignant economic libertarian. I think Carper would love to restore the old hard left news monopoly.
8 posted on 11/21/2003 12:51:11 PM PST by .cnI redruM (The social agenda of the Democratic Party reminds me of a creepy XXX fetish show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Oh brother! RATS are at it again. Drooling at the thought getting to spend more money gained through another avenue of taxation.
9 posted on 11/21/2003 1:39:15 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abram
Democrats are taxing themselves out of existence and good riddance! On my local radio station I hear an ad advocating keeping the ban on Internet taxes. The ad says that they may even try to TAX INCOMING SPAM MAIL. Every day I have to delete about 60 e-mails for viagra, sex with animals, etc. What to do? e-mail my two Senators? Schumer and Clinton. I won't even e-mail them when I won't be taxed for doing so.
10 posted on 11/21/2003 1:57:16 PM PST by maxwellp (Throw the U.N. in the garbage where it belongs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Carper (whose interests you accurately identify) is not exactly a Senate leader. He can filibuster as long as he can personally stand up and run his mouth, and as long as 40+ other Senators are willing to let him.

Against a bill absolutely certain to be popular with the voters. This is fine for a Carper, but none of the Senators in a tight race this year will touch it with a bargepole.

Hot tip -- screwing the voters in favour of the walruses on public assistance (via state and local "no show," "low show," and "no heavy lifting" jobs) is a really stupid thing to do within voters' brain-horizon of an election.

cheers

-=K=-
11 posted on 11/21/2003 3:54:45 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F (The essence of life, I concluded, did not lie in the material. -- Charles A. Lindbergh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson