1 posted on
11/24/2003 6:04:49 AM PST by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
This will be shown in court, and we will be able to put this horrible time behind us
2 posted on
11/24/2003 6:06:25 AM PST by
Tijeras_Slim
(SSDD - Same S#it Different Democrat)
To: sarcasm
3 posted on
11/24/2003 6:08:05 AM PST by
Helms
To: sarcasm
To: sarcasm
hosted Taylor's 1991 wedding to construction worker Larry Fortensky at Neverland. Larry Fortensky. Now that`s a guy they should make a movie about. Construction worker goes to the Twilight Zone and back.
5 posted on
11/24/2003 6:18:15 AM PST by
metalboy
(I`m still waiting for the mass protests against Al Qaida and Saddam)
To: sarcasm
I was worried about Elizabeth Taylor. I'm so glad she can stand up for her friend. She certainly is a woman of great principle and strong integrity. I was relieved, as she surely does have great insight, into the intimacy of Jackos psycho. I wonder if she considers him like a daughter?
To: sarcasm
Jackson better get busy figuring out how he's going to convince the jury- not his fans.
8 posted on
11/24/2003 6:21:41 AM PST by
Prodigal Son
("Fundamentalist Left". It's a great meme. Spread it.)
To: sarcasm
does it have a link to nambla?
9 posted on
11/24/2003 6:26:08 AM PST by
isom35
To: sarcasm
Dear Mr. Jackson:
If you are indeed innocent, and I hope you are, there are other things you need to "put behind". Number one: sell the ranch. It makes you look like a child molester.
Number two: Get a haircut. Long hair may be making a come back, but not for men your age. It makes you look like a man who wants to be a woman.
Number three: Stop wearing make-up. No man I know wears make-up. You always look like you just got up off the prep table at Campbell's Funeral Home. Stop it! It's scary!
Number four: Give all your money, every last dime and asset, to the Girl and Boys Scouts of America. Give "your" children back to their mothers.
Number five: Get rid of all your spooky "friends". Having Liz Taylor and Liza Minelli as your closest friends makes the wrong statement. Grow a beer gut.
Number six: Move back to Gary, Ind. and rent a small house.
Get a job in a warehouse. Horse around with the guys on the loading dock for a while. Spit on the ground and scratch yourself. Be a man.
11 posted on
11/24/2003 6:33:25 AM PST by
whereasandsoforth
(tagged for migratory purposes only)
To: sarcasm
12 posted on
11/24/2003 6:44:06 AM PST by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
To: sarcasm
Michael Jackson will face these charges in court in front of a jury.
One thing the world can be certain of today, MJ is one of the world's great control freaks.
The endless procession of obviously bought-and-paid-for public relations consultants parading through the news network studios is odious in the extreme. All these news organizations are trading credibility for ratings, IMO, and it's a disgusting spectacle to see them giving paid liars an "objective" stage.
To: sarcasm
"With few exceptions most of them are simply filling a desperate void in our culture that equates visibility with insight," he said....
Michael's right about that, of course.
You know, I think the other Jackson siblings secretly delight when Michael Jackson gets in trouble. It's the only time anybody in the world will interview Tito or Jermaine or LaToya. The more trouble Michael gets into, the more face time they get on TV!
As for Michael, if you think you are getting too much publicity, fire your publicist!
14 posted on
11/24/2003 6:47:50 AM PST by
gridlock
(OK, so I was wrong about Hillary! announcing for President. Sue me!)
To: sarcasm
These charges are very serious. But I do not agree with trying him in the media. I know people are interested in his guilt or innocence , anything to do harming children is so emotionaly taxing.
I don't think people shouldn't talk about the case or what it means to our society, but having the meida cover his every move, statement and previous mis-deeds is not right.
He hasn't even made into court yet.
I have my opinions , but I am going to ignore this story and the talking heads, until there is some real data on this story. If he is guilty I hope he found guilty, if he is not guilty I hope his name is cleared up once and for all.
We do need to know for sure one way or the other, but I don't think we can make those judgements based upon the info we have been given thus far.
I know someone is going to chime in about the love lettters, well I have written "love" letters to children myself. I have posted poems to a child right here on this forum. Until I see the letters, I, for one, am going to reserve judgement on that .
To: sarcasm
WWW.JUSTBEATIT.ORG
20 posted on
11/24/2003 7:16:13 AM PST by
Lockbox
To: sarcasm
Hey, his web site doesnt have any links where we can e-mail him. He is so lame!
25 posted on
11/24/2003 1:09:35 PM PST by
Delta 21
(Political Correctness is UnConstitutional)
To: sarcasm
I hear he's also revising the words to his song "Billy Jean."
Part of the chorus goes like this:
Little boy is not my lover
He's just a boy who claims that I am "that way"
But the kid is not my prey
He says I am "that way", but the kid is not my prey
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson