Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GIVING THANKS FOR FREE SPEECH
The Defend Reagan Committee - www.DefendReagan.org ^ | November 24, 2003 | Howard Kaloogian

Posted on 11/24/2003 6:09:13 PM PST by Impeach98

GIVING THANKS FOR FREE SPEECH

By The Honorable Howard Kaloogian, Chairman, Defend Reagan Committee

Hundreds of thousands of Americans recently exercised their right of free speech and persuaded CBS Television not to run a mean-spirited and false miniseries about President and Mrs. Ronald Reagan. Yet to listen to the howls emanating from the liberal left, one would think that such citizen action was crass censorship – dangerous and hostile to our civil liberties.

The fury began after an October 21st New York Times article revealed that the CBS miniseries, “The Reagans,” would be a hatchet job on President Reagan, his wife Nancy, and his administration. Lies and fabrications were combined with an array of slanted and misleading scenes to create a complete distortion of who Ronald Reagan really was.

What was astounding about all of this is that CBS had initially pledged to tell the touching love story between Ronald and Nancy Reagan. But in the end, the script and promos revealed a production that was nothing more than a politically motivated attack on Reagan’s character, decency and historic achievements while in office.

Many Reagan admirers found it appalling that CBS and parent company Viacom would launch such an attack on a popular president, who at 92-years old is bravely battling the ravages of Alzheimer’s with his wife at his side.

In order to understand how such an inaccurate portrayal could come about, just examine those involved. The leading actors in the production are avowed liberal Democrats. CBS president Les Moonves is a leading fundraiser for Democrat candidates for office. The openly gay producers, Neil Meron and Craig Zadan, are the same team behind the television series “It’s All Relative” where a conservative Irish Catholic couple are portrayed as homophobic, loud-mouthed and simple minded.

No one close to the Reagan family, or his administration, were ever once consulted for help, information or background for the series. Obviously this wasn’t a good faith effort to give a fair account to the lives or love story of the Reagan’s.

And so, with the help of the Internet, talk radio and cable television, Americans across this nation spoke out and inundated CBS, Viacom and their advertisers’ offices with phone calls, letters and e-mails of protest.

CBS was overwhelmed by the uproar and decided not to air the miniseries, even admitting the miniseries was unfair. But parent company Viacom was determined to proceed with the production and milk it for every dollar they could. They announced that the program would instead air Thanksgiving weekend as a 3-hour movie on the Viacom-owned Showtime cable network.

Viacom’s willingness to do anything to recoup some of their financial losses has resulted in a continuing campaign by the Defend Reagan Committee to lead offended Americans in their protest efforts. Thousands have cancelled their Showtime subscriptions, others have complained to their cable operators and some have even dumped their Viacom stock.

This is precisely the action one would hope for and expect from an engaged, active and free public. But, to the liberals who relished in the thought of seeing Reagan smeared, it is nothing more than censorship. Free speech to them is only when someone tears down America, not when liberals are skewered by citizen action.

Forget for a moment that true censorship would involve action by the government to dictate what could and couldn’t be shown on either CBS or Showtime, not action by private citizens. The liberals who are crying foul don’t really believe their own spin that this populace uprising is censorship. They just cannot believe that there has been such strong opposition by the American public to seeing a prominent conservative leader defamed by liberal slander.

The left doesn’t understand that in a free enterprise system the public can use the threat of taking their business – in this case viewership – elsewhere if they are mistreated by a vendor.

All of this is remarkable given the Left’s recent glee at organizing almost identical protests against the now-cancelled Dr. Laura television show. Apparently the shoe doesn’t fit so well on the other foot.

There’s an important reason for supporters of President Reagan to rise up and take action. It’s not just that they should exercise their right to free speech (in this case their opposition to a smear campaign against the likes of Ronald Reagan), but instead because our nation’s culture, values, and politics are guided by our history.

Last week ABC News conducted an investigation into the death of President John F. Kennedy to silence once and for all those who doubted that Lee Harvey Oswald was Kennedy’s lone assassin. Anchor Peter Jennings demonstrated how computer analysis of video from the day had ruled out a second shooter on the legendary grassy knoll and also showed that the shots that struck Kennedy had come from the sixth floor book depository window where Oswald was perched.

Jennings spent the last segment of the ABC News special explaining that Oliver Stone’s movie “JFK” – where it was presented as fact that it was a conspiracy and not simply Oswald behind Kennedy’s murder – had resulted in a whole generation of younger Americans being exposed to a version of history on an event that they were not old enough to have lived through themselves. As a result, to them, history was defined by the “creative license” of Oliver Stone, which Jennings demonstrated was a series of lies and distortions.

The lessons from Kennedy can well be applied to Reagan. For those who truly care about the man, his legacy and seeing it preserved as a guidepost for our future, there can be little choice but to rise up and make our voices heard whenever an Oliver Stone, Neil Meron, or Chris Zadan attempts to rewrite history to express their own ideological mantra.

The fact that we have the right to voice our protest and the right to tell companies we will take our business elsewhere is something that defines a core greatness in our American tradition. This right to free speech is something we should celebrate this Thanksgiving Day.

Howard Kaloogian is Chairman of the Defend Reagan Committee (website: www.DefendReagan.org). He is a former California State Assemblyman (Republican) and was also Chairman of the successful Recall Gray Davis Committee, which in October recalled Governor Gray Davis from office – the first time a governor had been recalled in California’s history.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: cbs; censorship; defend; free; howard; kaloogian; liberals; reagan; showtime; speech; viacom

1 posted on 11/24/2003 6:09:15 PM PST by Impeach98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: happyface3
Free speech and telling lies are two completely different things. I can't abide people who tell lies.
3 posted on 11/24/2003 6:30:48 PM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
Liberals believe free speech is their right to kick us and our beliefs. When conservatives do it, then it is censorship!
4 posted on 11/24/2003 6:41:49 PM PST by RWGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister
Agreed - and that was Kaloogian's point. People have the right of free speech to rise up and protest the airing of "lies" to try to rewrite history :)
5 posted on 11/24/2003 7:04:18 PM PST by Impeach98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
Regarding Freedom of Speech:

I want to say that (--------------Redacted----------------)
(--------------------------Redacted--------------------------)
(--------------------------Redacted--------------------------)
(--------------------------Redacted--------------------------)
and forever.

6 posted on 11/24/2003 7:19:51 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Impeach98
Ronnie Bump!
8 posted on 11/25/2003 10:37:17 AM PST by evilsmoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happyface3
Yes, and once again:

The 1st Amendment right to free speech is a worthy ideal, but it will never catch on and, in fact, we are steadily moving further away from that ideal. It is being usurped by other laws of the land and by Political Correctness.

Saying what you believe can get you in hot water, can inhibit your career potential, can get you ostracised, can get you fired, can get you sued, can get you labeled as a bigot / hater / intolerant / homophobe / etc, can lose you an election, can scar you for life, can turn you into a "person of interest," can get you dead,......and it's all legal. (The "dead" part may or may not be legal, but it's real.)

9 posted on 11/25/2003 10:48:44 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
Free speech was Michael Savage saying what he thought about gays.

Free speech was Rush telling the truth about Donovan McNabb's athletic (in)abilities.

Yet in these instances both men lost their positions on media shows for exercizing their right to free speech.

Dims are for free speech only when it works to erode the moral fiber of society.

Yet another reason why dims suck.

10 posted on 12/06/2003 12:53:59 PM PST by South40 (My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson