Skip to comments.
Nellie Connally Disputes Warren Commission
NewsMax.com ^
| 11/25/03
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 11/24/2003 11:56:47 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-407 next last
To: raisincane
She claims Oswald was there, by his own ommission to her the day before, to shot the killer. Her story was compelling, but who knows?
Please clarify: Oswald's role was to kill another sniper?
To: texasbluebell
Yes, I can.
The rear hole was 5 1/2 inches below his Mastoid Process and an inch to the right of spine. Measure downward from the bony thing behind your ear lobe.
A 161 grain bullet going 2000 feet a second doesn't stop in a finger's length of flesh.
Only three shots fired and Connelly's thigh was injured. Think about it.
42
posted on
11/25/2003 9:09:45 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Deuce
If four bullets were fired, but two of them were fired simultaneously or virtually simultaneously, how would Nellie Connally or any other witness know that there were more than three shots?
To: veronica
Nellie Connolly herself states that only three shots were fired. 'Splain that. She was mistaken. Taking all of the eye witnesses, accoustic evidence, photographic evidence, injuries observed by Parkland doctors, etc. Leads me to multiple shooters firing more than three shoots
44
posted on
11/25/2003 9:19:26 AM PST
by
Deuce
To: texasbluebell
The HSCA went on to determine that there was probably a conspiracy, though they could not say who the conspirators were. (They based it not solely on the audio evidence, which some say is debunked.) It has been debunked.
45
posted on
11/25/2003 9:29:34 AM PST
by
veronica
("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
To: texasbluebell
Didn't the Parkland docs all say the hole in JFK's throat was an entrance wound and not an exit wound? Am I remembering that correctly? Yep, that's what the ER pros said, but who are they to know.Initially they thought that UNTIL they turned him over.
The wound in front was altered when they did the tracheostomy, hence it resembled an entrance wound.
46
posted on
11/25/2003 9:32:19 AM PST
by
veronica
("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
To: aristeides
How would someone using a 20 dollar rifle know when to shoot at the same time as someone shooting in another location?
47
posted on
11/25/2003 9:32:38 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Deuce
She was mistaken. Taking all of the eye witnesses, accoustic evidence, photographic evidence, injuries observed by Parkland doctors, etc. Leads me to multiple shooters firing more than three shoots.There is ZERO evidence of multiple shooters.
And again, Oswald's own brother, who of all people on earth has a reason to try and find evidence to exonerate his brother, has found none.
48
posted on
11/25/2003 9:38:36 AM PST
by
veronica
("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
To: Deuce
The three guys on the fifth floor said they heard only three shots.
Zapruder even filmed part of the fence as he panned right.
49
posted on
11/25/2003 9:42:38 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: raisincane
Huh?
50
posted on
11/25/2003 9:43:21 AM PST
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children)
To: veronica
In this interview with Larry King, Nellie Connolly says that there were only three shots - that the second one hit her husband - and that the third shot hit the President's head. She also says that there were no shots from the front. 'Splain that.
I don't really have a dog in this fight, as I don't really care who shot kennedy, but, maybe she only heard three shots b/c there was a silencer involved on another weapon? Just a thought.
51
posted on
11/25/2003 9:43:23 AM PST
by
brownie
To: Shooter 2.5
How would someone using a 20 dollar rifle know when to shoot at the same time as someone shooting in another location? could be the opposite. Oswald as the patsy, and someone with a weapon w/ silencer fired when he heard the Oswald shots, to make sure the job was done.
52
posted on
11/25/2003 9:47:39 AM PST
by
brownie
To: brownie
Then you would still hear four shots.
And where could that other sniper hide? It wasn't behind the fence because more than one person would have been able to give the SAME description. It wasn't on the railroad bridge because that's where the small crowd of people were, plus two officers.
Remember that crowd of people that were rushing to find the killer on the knoll? They were going to watch the limo go north on the freeway as it went to the hospital. And that crowd didn't find anyone either. Neither did the motorcycle cop or the bum he walked into behind the fence.
53
posted on
11/25/2003 10:07:43 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: veronica
There is ZERO evidence of multiple shooters. Evidence (and direction) of more than three shots is given by eyewitness testimony, the Zapruder film, accoustical evidence, and Parkland doctors. Did you mean to say, "zero evidence after ignoring or discounting or explaining away all evidence that does point in the direction of more than three shots."
54
posted on
11/25/2003 10:14:35 AM PST
by
Deuce
To: Shooter 2.5
The three guys on the fifth floor said they heard only three shots. Why do these eye witnesses, among all eyewitnesses, represent the best evidence to you?
An investigation that accepts all evidence that fits the preconceived "Lone nut acting alone" theory and rejects, dismisses, or debunks all evidence that does not fit that theory, said theory having been announced within hours of the event, makes me very suspicious. It doesn't make you suspicious?
55
posted on
11/25/2003 10:24:53 AM PST
by
Deuce
To: Deuce
The conspiracy theories have been debunked over and over.
56
posted on
11/25/2003 10:45:48 AM PST
by
veronica
("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
To: Deuce
Evidence (and direction) of more than three shots is given by eyewitness testimony, the Zapruder film, accoustical evidence, and Parkland doctors. Please indicate where in the Zapruder film there is evidence of more than three shots.
57
posted on
11/25/2003 10:57:26 AM PST
by
Tares
To: Deuce
All three people described the exact same thing. They also described conditions that wouldn't have happened had the shots not come from there such as the dust falling on their heads or the sound of the three cases hitting the ground.[A fourth round was chambered.]
No separate people at any other location described the exact same thing.
Also, there was a railroad tower behind the fence. The guy in the tower noticed two men standing next to the fence and they weren't doing anything like shooting. IIRC.
58
posted on
11/25/2003 11:14:59 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Tares
I went to your link and could not identify the sequence I have seen many times on TV. Let me just describe it:
1. Kennedy hit in neck with evidence Connolly not hit for several frames;
2. Kennedy hit in head after Conolly alreadyt hit. The above two points combined with the missed shot = 4 (minimum) shots. Furthermore, the head shot, particularly in slow motion indicates a shot to the right temple, producing a "back and to the left" motion. Such injuries are consistent with Parkland doctor testimony that shots to Kennedy were BOTH frontal, numerous eyewitnesses, etc.
59
posted on
11/25/2003 11:23:20 AM PST
by
Deuce
To: Deuce
The forward motion AT THE MOMENT OF IMPACT.
60
posted on
11/25/2003 11:33:34 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-407 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson