Posted on 11/28/2003 10:24:23 AM PST by Lessismore
Whatever language God chose to converse with Adam. Perhaps what came to be known as Hebrew, but there is no way to know.
Perhaps your concern is to the historicity of this claim. There is no reason to believe that this did not happen, except, of course, to deny the historicity of the Book of Genesis. You are certainly welcome to do so, but no less an authority than Jesus attested to the historicity, not only of Genesis, but of Adam himself.
I have that book. I started it but didn't find it very intresting. Maybe I'll try again.
Thanks, I knew someone was smart enough to figure out how to post it.
LOL. Oh, of course I did . . .
NOT!! ;-)
More recently I discovered that the Saami (Laplanders), who had little contact with anyone outside their own circles of reindeer chasers until about 1000 years ago, left cliff and cave drawings which can be "dated" back before the existence of Hebrews or any of the Semitic languages.
Some folks think these guys were in place fishing out of the Arctic Ocean as long as 10,000 years ago (although none of their drawings date that old), and possibly were there during the last big glaciation.
The ancient cliff drawings are representations of various "stories". There are some "husband selecting" stories that are much more in line the tale of Lot and his daughters than just about anything else you can think of.
It's pretty easy to find these things on the internet if anyone has an interest.
If "Adam" is Biblically clocked as preceeding "Lot" and we can postulate that the Biblical chronologies are spiritually correct, it is possible the "flood" being discussed occurred at the end of the last Ice Age (14000 years ago) and not at the time of the flooding of the Black Sea basin (a mere 7500 years ago).
The story of Adam being driven out of Eden (and barred from that place by an angel bearing a flaming sword) would also preceed the desertification of the Sahara, and the last previous desertification would be some time during the last glaciation.
Thor Hyerdahl and other ethnologists proposed that the stories of "Bifrost Giants" current in ancient Norwegian tales probably arose during the last Ice Age, thereby demonstrating that a rollicking good story has a long shelf-life!
S.M. Stirling from Santa Fe, NM -- A recent edition of "British Archaeology" noted that the ideological prejudice against the idea of population movements among British archaeologists had gotten to the point where some postgraduate student would soon come up with a paper 'proving' that the first humans in Britain weren't immigrants at all, but purely indigenous, symbolically transformed reindeer. [Amazon reader review]
Archaeology and Language:
The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins
by Colin Renfrew
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
I kind of that ear for language. I can the difference between language. Anatolia is present day Turkey. I know Turkish is not an Indo-European language.
Muttly family tradition states that it was started by a talking dog who sold pistacio nuts from a flying carpet...but I digress.....
Ain't science great?!
Actually, me love this stuff...very exciting to be living in this time. Postulate ON, ye humans. (we get a kick out of it)
Afghanistan? Possible.
nah, that'll kill the tongue. You just obtain a plug. Then fill it in with a bar and call it a piercing.
:p
:D
I made some personal searches regarding IE-languages.Some of my preliminary results are:
1.The sumero-tamil language is the main contributor to the forming of IE-languages.It was the most IE-type language of his time.It is containing many basic components later found in IE-languages.
2.The second contributor is proto-akkadian.The sumerian and akkadian areas and languges overlapt.
3.As one must notice,the sanskrite and akkadian-like word roots are the main componets found in IE-languages and the proofs are overhelming.
4.I am suspecting:
-An very early austric infussion in Iberia.
-An early infusion of proto-sumerian in Danube area.
-The very place of final shping of IE-languages was in Mediterranean area.This could not been possible without the contact with afro-semitic and proto-iberian languages.
-The kurgans possible introduced only proto-slavic languages to Europe and not IE-languages proper.
5.The place of origin of latines/letoones is close to Lycia.They entered Europe very early and in Danubian area diverged in some 3 branches.
I am waiting your feed-bac to my notices. ing. Rau Eugen,Romania eugen_rau@hotmail.com
|
|||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Discover · Bronze Age Forum · Science Daily · Science News · Eurekalert · PhysOrg · · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · Archaeology · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · · History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword · · Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · · |
‘There is no reason to believe that this did not happen, except, of course, to deny the historicity of the Book of Genesis’
since Genesis delivers up two differing accounts of the Creation, skepticism is certainly on the table concerning its historicity...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.