Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hatchet Job? Reagan Movie Is Run of the Mill (The Official New York Times Review!)
The New York Times ^ | November 30, 2003 | Alessandra Stanley

Posted on 11/30/2003 2:16:26 AM PST by Timesink

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Why am I not surprised by the tone or conclusions of this review?
1 posted on 11/30/2003 2:16:27 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...

Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


This is the Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this is a medium- to high-volume list.
Please feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of this ping list. I can't catch them all!


2 posted on 11/30/2003 2:17:36 AM PST by Timesink (I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
The NYT would do well to replace this "reviewer" with Jayson Blair. He's more honest.
3 posted on 11/30/2003 2:25:07 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
shot mostly in darkly lit interiors and small, enclosed spaces like hospital rooms, elevators and the presidential bedroom
Saving money on the sets?

Cheap is as cheap does.

4 posted on 11/30/2003 2:25:53 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
...the only Red menace is Nancy Reagan's wardrobe...

Haw haw.

Hey, Ms. Dowd Lite, we've read Ann Coulter's book. We know how your paper worked 24/7 covering for Soviet spies, back then.

5 posted on 11/30/2003 2:29:41 AM PST by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
TimesWatch has an interesting "Topic Index" on Stanley.
6 posted on 11/30/2003 3:23:13 AM PST by martin_fierro (_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"The Reagans" is reasonably accurate, at times engrossing, at other times silly and sometimes even dull. It is not a thoughtful look at a critical moment in American history. It is a domestic drama about a loving couple beset by Hollywood agents, Republican backers, scheming advisers and, most of all, their angry, needy children.

Perhaps noonan's "When Character Was King," will serve as basis for another try. Buy the book for yourself, a relative or friend -- it's worth every penny.

7 posted on 11/30/2003 3:57:35 AM PST by dadokane (bypass her first 20, self-indulgent pages, though.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I can see why the NYT would consider it "harmless." However, their protestations belie that position.
8 posted on 11/30/2003 4:00:51 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Let the revisionism begin.
9 posted on 11/30/2003 4:38:39 AM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I haven't seen it and really don't intend to. But as I understand so far, they skip over "Mr. Gorbachov (sp) tear down this wall!"

This was RR's lifelong dream and everything he did culminated in the downfall of communism in his lifetime. They did not address it at all from what I understand, and certainly not as his life's work.

What a distortion!

DK
10 posted on 11/30/2003 4:46:15 AM PST by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I am canceling my HBO-Showtime service today. Both of these are turning into cultural sub-pumps of liberal sewage. No Sopranos, just allot of too cool for school programs. Six Feet Under.
11 posted on 11/30/2003 7:00:15 AM PST by Helms (The Di-tech Guy and E-loan Girl are to Wed in Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I saw an advance screening of this film. The economic boom is not touched upon at all. The state of the nation after the brutal Carter policies is not mentioned. Reagan is not given credit for any good decision he ever made. The producers credit Nancy, Mike Deaver, and others instead. Reagan is seen as a dumb, lazy, ignorant pawn of history, instead of his true role as epochal man of change. It is not anger-provoking, merely boring. I watched it with a liberal and even she said it was silly and dull, and an "obvious fiction".

Don't bother watching it. You will only be annoyed at your own waste of time.

12 posted on 11/30/2003 10:23:15 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Some things never change. I am surprised the people who created this movie didn't just go over to Reagan's home and injury him physically, such as they have done emotionally with this unhappy, destructive, very inaccurate creation. It is shameful. It is not the inaccuracies that is the worst, it is the intent. Sad for the country.
13 posted on 11/30/2003 10:35:17 AM PST by thesummerwind (like painted skies, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Clearly, CBS thought that watering down their ludicrous movie would make it even-handed. If they really wanted an even-handed film, they should have strived to tell the truth.
14 posted on 11/30/2003 1:24:15 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It hasn't been a good week for me media… GW Thanksgiving surprise to the troops and now this, LOL.
15 posted on 11/30/2003 1:32:25 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul (I love the smell of winning, the taste of victory, and the joy of each glorious triumph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Bump to that. LOL.
16 posted on 11/30/2003 7:01:42 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
LOL! Hi AC, good to see ya! How's your puter?
17 posted on 11/30/2003 7:32:40 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul (I love the smell of winning, the taste of victory, and the joy of each glorious triumph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Good to see ya, Victoria! How was your Thanksgiving?

The 'puter is not quite OK, but it doesn't crash like it used to. I tried to install Windows 2000 yesterday, but I need to talk to the IT guy from work -- I think I'm doing something wrong.

18 posted on 11/30/2003 7:46:49 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Thanksgiving was great, thanks for asking.

Oh no, you doing something wrong? That's not possible.

19 posted on 11/30/2003 7:49:37 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul (I love the smell of winning, the taste of victory, and the joy of each glorious triumph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Oh no, you doing something wrong? That's not possible.

LOL!!!!

I hope nobody reads your comment -- they're going to start getting all sorts of wrong ideas about me in their heads!

20 posted on 11/30/2003 7:51:09 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson