If you choose to go into the evolutionist profession, here is some advice. Never question anything that seems to positively assert evolution. Speak forcefully and positively as if you have some real data. If all else fails, don't be afraid to make something up. After all, who really can check on you. Say something like, "I have a friend who is doing research in micro-biology at the University, and he has found proof of evolution at a microscopic level." It would take someone a lot of work and many questions to get you to admit that you don't know what you're talking about.
Some might think that these tactics are unethical, but, given that you don't believe in God, and you don't believe in the Bible, by what standard would it be wrong to lie? Who is really to say what is or isn't ethical. If you throw God and the Bible out, there is no standard by which it would be wrong to lie, so you are free from the constraints of God and the Bible and absolutely free to lie your little heart out. And, even if you decided to make up an arbitrary rule against lying, the definion of, "lie," is purely a fabrication of your own mind. You are not constrained by the Bible or the Spirit of God.
Just take the example of a recent U.S. President who redefined the word, "is," as well as some other words. It's doubtful that his Vice President is capable of telling the truth, yet look at how hard all the news commentators and newspapers have worked to move the former Vice President of the U.S. into the presidency, even though they were unsuccessful. Even now, the news media continues to try to put a positive spin on all the criminal activity, lies, and indecent behavior of that administration. As an evolutionist, you can depend on the support of this same power of the media.
How did you come to the conclusion that people who believe in evolution do not believe in God? Many of the evolutionists on this thread, me included, have repeatedly said we believe in God.
Just take the example of a recent U.S. President who redefined the word, "is,"
Ahh, argument by Clinton. If you don't agree with creationism, you are a statist, marxist, leninist clinton-lover. How persuasive.
LOL! Obviously you've never been to a scientific conference or symposium in your life.
HINT: There are two main ways to make a big reputation in science. Come up with your own major discovery or theory; or shoot down somebody else's. The second option is the easier and invariably pursued with gusto given the slightest hint of an opening.
Most scientists are highly intellectually aggressive. Evolutionists are no exception. You would have us believe that they put some supposed nefarious ideological cabal above their own critical instincts and their personal interests in career advancement and prestige. This is silly.