Skip to comments.
'No. I've said no, no, no'
NY Daily News ^
| Mon Dec 8
| JAMES GORDON MEEK
Posted on 12/09/2003 7:17:49 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
12/09/2003 7:17:50 AM PST
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
Dear senator,
If you've said "No, no, no" then why are you registered with the FEC as a candidate for president in 2004?
2
posted on
12/09/2003 7:20:53 AM PST
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: coloradan
That's one of her surgical doubles.
3
posted on
12/09/2003 7:26:14 AM PST
by
risk
To: presidio9
Talking Head: "Senator clinton, Will you say 'no'?"
Hillary: "I've already said 'No.' ""
Talking Head: "Mr. President, Will you apologize?"
Clinton: "I've already apologized."
4
posted on
12/09/2003 7:30:35 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: presidio9
This pretty much locks it up...HRC will be accepting a draft (something her husband never did) for the 2004 nomination. You can still get a Hillary contract for about $7.00 over at tradesports. This is considerably more expensive than the contract on Kerry, Lieberman, Edwards, Sharpton, Kucinich, etc.
To: presidio9
Now the vice president's slot under someone who'd soon resign "for health reasons" or due to a suddenly breaking scandal...
To: presidio9
I'm looking forward to Hitlary being the dim's nominee.
Face it, the dwarves are so boring we would all be asleep for most of 2004.
At least with "the smartest woman in the world" we will be able to get heatedly involved, and watch as the final chapter of the clintonistas' unfolds.
7
posted on
12/09/2003 7:32:47 AM PST
by
G.Mason
To: presidio9
"No, no. I've said no. I've said no, no, no, no," the New York Democrat told NBC's "Meet the Press," when asked if she would accept her party's nomination in 2004. What, no mention of that rehearsed laugh that she repeated identically on all three networks?
To: struwwelpeter
You've got it! I have been saying for over a year that Her Lowness is going to take the VP slot in next year's run. They (Dean? & Clinton) will, of course, lose but Hillary will be the shoe-in for nomination in 2008 and will be seen as the "unity" candidate!
To: Moosilauke
You can still get a Hillary contract for about $7.00 over at tradesports. This is considerably more expensive than the contract on Kerry, Lieberman, Edwards, Sharpton, Kucinich, etc. You can take out a contract on Hillary for only 7 bucks? I thought hit men were more expensive than that ;)
LQ
To: struwwelpeter
To: All
But no matter how many times she said no, the questions kept landing as Clinton made the rounds to ABC and CBS. Nobody believes her because they know she is an f***ing lier. Knowing that, the Democrats and kool-aid drinkers still want her as President.
It's as if they're pleading, "Go ahead and lie to us. We still want you as President."
Go figure...
12
posted on
12/09/2003 7:50:32 AM PST
by
BFM
To: presidio9
Can she even win reelection in 2006? I think if New York canned her 2008 would be lost for her as well.
13
posted on
12/09/2003 7:51:05 AM PST
by
bethelgrad
(for God, country, and the Corps OOH RAH!)
To: bethelgrad
Can she even win reelection in 2006? I think if New York canned her 2008 would be lost for her as well. That's why I want Guiliani to wait for her. Only he can drive that stake through her heart. And I think secretly he's pissed about how she won that election in 2000. It was just starting to get nasty in the Spring before he dropped out.
14
posted on
12/09/2003 8:00:52 AM PST
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: BFM
"No, no. I've said no. I've said no, no, no, no,"
Isn't that what Juanita said?
15
posted on
12/09/2003 8:51:07 AM PST
by
CJ Wolf
To: presidio9
Can she even win reelection in 2006? I think if New York canned her 2008 would be lost for her as well. "That's why I want Guiliani to wait for her. Only he can drive that stake through her heart."
Or could Colin Powell be the Republican Senate candidate from NY in 2006? He's a NY'er, and Rudy may go for The Governor job as Pataki's term is finished.
16
posted on
12/09/2003 8:58:14 AM PST
by
NewLand
To: NewLand
Or could Colin Powell be the Republican Senate candidate from NY in 2006? Interesting, but isn't that a step backwards?
He's a NY'er
Since when did that matter in NY?
17
posted on
12/09/2003 9:03:02 AM PST
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: presidio9
Interesting, but isn't that a step backwards? No less than it was for the "co-president"...I think Powell has ambitions beyond a cabinet position, this could be a better first step. Just a thought, I believe others have had as well.
18
posted on
12/09/2003 9:09:16 AM PST
by
NewLand
To: presidio9
Your lips say "no", but your greedy, black, whithered heart says "yes".
19
posted on
12/09/2003 9:12:15 AM PST
by
Redcloak
(Got avarice?)
To: Redcloak
20
posted on
12/09/2003 9:16:27 AM PST
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson