Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

911 Victim’s Wife files RICO Act
PoliticsPa.com ^ | 11/26 & 12/9/03 | Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Posted on 12/10/2003 3:20:52 PM PST by pittsburgh gop guy

For Immediate Release: - 11/26/03

For Further Information Contact:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire 706 Ridge Pike

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-1711

Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134

(800) 993-PHIL

Fax (610) 834-7659

PJBLAW@aol.com

News Conference – Wednesday - 11/26/03 – 12 Noon

5th & Ranstead Streets, Philadelphia

[corner of Bourse Building with Independence Hall in background]

911 Victim’s Wife, Ellen Mariani, files RICO Act [Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act] Federal Court Complaint against President Bush and Cabinet Members

(Philadelphia, PA – 11/26/03) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, announced today that he, attorney for Ellen Mariani, wife of Louis Neil Mariani, who died when United Air Lines flight 175 was flown into the South Tower of the World Trade Center on 9-11 at a news conference regarding the filing of a detailed Amended Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on 11/26/03 in the case of Mariani vs. Bush et al that he is alleging President Bush and officials including, but not limited to Cheney, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld and Feinberg that they:

1. had knowledge/warnings of 911 and failed to warn or take steps to prevent;

2. have been covering up the truth of 911; and

3. have therefore violated the laws of the United States; and

4. are being sued under the Civil RICO Act.

Berg stated: “I will be detailing the charges against Bush and others and handing out copies of the:

1. Amended Complaint;

2. a Letter from Ellen Mariani to President Bush that sets forth her beliefs that President Bush knowingly and willfully failed to act and prevent the murder of her husband on 911 and the ongoing obstruction of justice; and

3. a Sworn Affidavit that the United States government twenty-eight [28] years ago undertook a study to prevent the very events of 911.

Mrs. Mariani was the first victim family member to bring civil action regarding the events of 911 against United Airlines. Since then, the “truth” of 911 has not been forthcoming and Mrs. Mariani, for the good of her country, now seeks the truth via this courageous action under the RICO Act.

Berg said: “The events surrounding "911" to date have yet to be uncovered.

While America was under attack, for approximately the next seven (7) to eighteen (18) minutes Defendant GWB continues to listen to the goat story while Plaintiff's husband was just murdered and does not immediately assume his duties as Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces.

Plaintiff, with her amended complaint intends to expose the truth to remember the dead and to prevent continued deaths of American military personnel due to President Bush's "failure to act and prevent" the worst attacks on our nation since Pearl Harbor.

Plaintiff hereby asserts Defendants, officially and individually are exclusively liable to answer the Counts in this Complaint under the United States Constitution and provisions of the 18 U.S.C. § 1964(a) and (c), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (hereinafter "RICO Act") for "failing to act and prevent" the murder of Plaintiff's husband, Louis Neil Mariani, for financial and political reasons and have "obstructed justice" in the aftermath of said criminal acts and omissions.

Defendant GWB has purported to the American People and the Plaintiff that the infamous attacks of "911" were directly masterminded by Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda Network terrorists (hereinafter "OBL"), almost immediately after the attacks. Yet, Defendant GWB has not been forthright and honest with regard to his administration's pre-knowledge of the potential of the "911" attacks and Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendant GWB to justify why her husband Louis Neil Mariani died on "911.'

Plaintiff believes Defendant GWB is invoking a long standard operating procedure of invoking national security and executive privilege claims to suppress the basis of this lawsuit that Defendant GWB, et al., failed to act and prevent the "911" attacks.

Plaintiff asserts, contrary to Defendant GWB's assertion that OBL is responsible for "911," the compelling evidence that will be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power by this Court and testimony at trial will lead to one undisputed fact, Defendant GWB failed to act and prevent "911" knowing the attacks would lead to our nation having to engage in an "International War on Terror (IWOT)" which would benefit Defendants both financially and for political reasons.

There are significant business ties that will be proven between Defendants and OBL's family which raise serious conflict of interest and other matters wherein "failing to act and prevent" the "911" attacks have benefited Defendants.

Reports have emerged and will be confirmed through discovery that the Carlyle Group, the giant U.S. defense contractor until recently employed Defendant and former President GHB. Hence, the "Bush Family" and other Defendants financial profiting by war goes to the heart of Plaintiff's RICO Act claim.

Plaintiff asserts, in the late 1970's and throughout the 1980's, Defendants were allies with OBL and Saddam Hussein during the former Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan and Iran-Iraq war respectively, wherein, personal and political deals were made and it is believed upon discovery, these dealings hold the truth about "911."

In sum, Plaintiff will call to trial former federal employees with firsthand knowledge and expertise with military intelligence and other duties to support the underlying RICO Act foundational basis to prove Defendants have engaged in a "pattern of criminal activity and obstruction of justice" in violation of the public trust and laws of the United States for personal and financial gains.

Plaintiff will prove, Defendants have engaged our nation in an endless war on terror to achieve their personal goals and agendas.

///////

** Copy of sixty-one [61] page Amended Complaint available by e-mail” – contact Phil Berg at PJBLAW@aol.com or call (610) 825-3134

//////

[Berg is a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania; former candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate; an attorney with offices in Montgomery County and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA.]

* * *

Philip J. Berg, Esq.

706 Ridge Pike

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-1711

(610) 662-3005 - Cell

(800) 993-PHIL

(610) 825-3134

(610) 834-7659 Fax

PJBLAW@aol.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911families; 911lawsuits; conspiracy; democratbullshit; demssuck; lawsuit; lawyerssuck; nutjobs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Whack-job!

Story is covered on Al Jazera, at: http://www.politicspa.com/temp/911aljazeera.htm:

I searched their website - but did not find the article - but I trust politicspa.com.

1 posted on 12/10/2003 3:20:53 PM PST by pittsburgh gop guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Exploiting her own loss for politics. BARF!
2 posted on 12/10/2003 3:22:49 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
I would love to see what the plaintiff submits as evidence
3 posted on 12/10/2003 3:22:59 PM PST by thoughtomator (The U.N. is a terrorist organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
This could very well be the first thing I've found funny about 9-11.

Hopefully, it will be the last.

I hope these morons waste a lot of their personal funds pursuing this.

4 posted on 12/10/2003 3:24:50 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Yawn. Another nutcase with a lawyer. An embarassment to the memory of 911 victims.
5 posted on 12/10/2003 3:25:14 PM PST by Arkinsaw (What LSU game? Huh? No idea what you are talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
If this nutjob wants to sue someone, she should sue former President Bill Clinton who passed on two YEARS' worth of offers to have Osama bin Laden handed over to the United States!

But nooooooooooooo...
6 posted on 12/10/2003 3:25:26 PM PST by Prime Choice (Leftist opinions may be free, but I still feel like I'm getting ripped off every time I receive one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Evidence? Who needs that?

This is nothing more than an excuse for a fishing expedition into classified materials---and an opportunity to bash Bush up to the time of the election.

You can rest assured that every document produced by the government in this lawsuit will be in the hands of the Democratic Party before the day is out.

7 posted on 12/10/2003 3:26:17 PM PST by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Pity party alert ..
8 posted on 12/10/2003 3:26:58 PM PST by Ben Bolt ( " The Spenders " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
The lawyer, Phil Berg, was actually a credible candidate in the Dem primary for AG some years back - but got his butt kicked by someone else that lost.

OH - and funny line I just heard on the Simpsons:

Bill Clinton gives a speech and then Homer says:

"That was Bill Clinton. He is Jimmy Carter with a Fox (network) attitude."
9 posted on 12/10/2003 3:27:28 PM PST by pittsburgh gop guy (now serving eastern Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I would love to see what the plaintiff submits as evidence

Justin Raimando's articles on how the Mossad knew it was coming and warned all of the Jews.

That screed someone posted a while back about how the federal government took over control of the airplanes and steered them into the buildings.

That French guy who said "There's no proof an airplane hit the Pentagon."

10 posted on 12/10/2003 3:28:16 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 07055
I believe this is indeed the case as you have written it here .
11 posted on 12/10/2003 3:28:39 PM PST by Ben Bolt ( " The Spenders " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I would love to see what the plaintiff submits as evidence

They'll pull a SCO and, in discovery, demand that Bush produce documents proving their case.

The lawyer already knows the administration will claim executive privilege and produce nothing. They will claim that proves the allegations are true.

Dean will harp on this "proof" (as will the media) as part of his campaign to fail to be elected president.

12 posted on 12/10/2003 3:29:20 PM PST by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
[Berg is a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, former candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate, a political activist, an attorney with offices in Montgomery County and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA.]

Party affiliation?

13 posted on 12/10/2003 3:29:41 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Party affiliation?

Guess (c8

14 posted on 12/10/2003 3:30:34 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Of course the DUmmies think ONCE AGAIN they have the issue to take out Bush. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
15 posted on 12/10/2003 3:30:57 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Party affiliation?

Yeah, one guess.

DEM!
16 posted on 12/10/2003 3:31:44 PM PST by pittsburgh gop guy (now serving eastern Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
You would think that after the whole Clinton impeachment mess the American public would be eminently aware that a sitting U.S. President cannot be sued in civil court for any action he takes in the execution of his office.

This was precisely why the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 9-0 decision allowing the Paula Jones lawsuit to go forward against Bill Clinton -- he was being sued for something he had done before he was elected to the White House.

17 posted on 12/10/2003 3:32:28 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
AHA!!!

Challenge of Presidential Election "Fraud" in Florida

The Challenge of Presidential Election "Fraud" in Florida Petition to Registered Voters was created by www.VotePower.com for the "Will of the People" and written by Philip J. Berg, Esquire.

Loser.

Or looser for those of you in Rio Linda!

18 posted on 12/10/2003 3:34:49 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
She must be a Democrat.
19 posted on 12/10/2003 3:37:16 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
This is GREAT!

If a court gives this suit the time of day, there should be a vast RICO suit against Klinton. Filegate, anyone?

20 posted on 12/10/2003 3:37:42 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Belief in your own objectivity is the essence of subjectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson