Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

11 Republican Senators, 41 Republican House Members and One Republican President Signed BCRA-2002
Congress | 12/10/03 | John Walsh

Posted on 12/10/2003 8:57:44 PM PST by jwalsh07

11 Republican Senators who voted for the BCFA of 2002:

McCain, Fitzgerald, Lugar, Collins, Snowe, Cochran, Domenicic, Spector, Chafee, Thompson Warner

41 Republican House Members voted for the BCFA of 2002:

Bohlert, Bono, Capito, Castle, Ferguson, Foley, Frelinghausen, Ganske, Gilchrest, Gilman, Graham, Greenwood, Grucci, Houghton, Horn, Johnson(CT), Johnson(IL), Kirk, LaTourette, Leach, LoBiondo, McHugh, Morella, Osborne, Ose, Petri, Platts, Quinn, Ramstad, Ros-Lehtinen, Sanders, Shays, Simmons, Smith(Mi), Thune, Upton, Walsh(not my clan), Wamp, Weldon(Pa), Wolf

One President Signed BCRA of 2002:

President Bush


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bcfa; bcra; bushscotuscfr; cfr; firstamendment; mccainfeingold; rinos; rollcall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: pgkdan
The idea of signing BCFRA was a terrible gamble on Bush's part. He lost big time.

Let's hope he learns the lesson: Never, ever trust the Supreme Court to base its decisions on the law. Never trust it to make the right decision.
41 posted on 12/11/2003 6:06:16 PM PST by GulliverSwift (Howard Dean is the Joker's insane twin brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
What a load of crap!

Elegant command of the language you have there ;-)

The country is still approximately HALF liberal/Democrat... the right has nowhere near a good majority yet, our work is simply not yet done. In addition, the conservatives only make up a PORTION of the GOP, there is a large portion that is yet centrist and they also have a vote according to the Constitution. This leaves us in a rather SMALL segment of the entire population and our Constitution is written in such a way as to PREVENT us from pulling a coup and running the entire country as we wish. Perhaps you missed it but America went radically to the left in the last couple of decades?

I for one appreciate any and all efforts you have made dragging this country back to the right. However, now is a pretty poor moment in our history for conservatives to have a temper tantrum because the job isn't finished.

42 posted on 12/11/2003 7:27:49 PM PST by Tamzee (Pennsylvanians for Bush! Join http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PA4BushCheney/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: shanscom
Most of the usual suspects, the moderates or the appeasers.

These people however should know better:

Sen. Thad Cochran (R - MS)
Rep. Tom Osborne (R - NE)
Rep. Todd Platts (R - PA)
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R - FL)
Rep. John Thune (R - SD)
Rep. Zach Wamp (R - TN)

I understand Thune. He was running against Tim Johnson at the time and I suppose he didn't want Johnson clubbing him with a "he voted against corporate reform" charge or something of the kind.

Cochran I really don't understand.
43 posted on 12/11/2003 7:49:16 PM PST by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (What does it say on the bottom of Coke bottles at DU? It says "Open Other End.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Believing that one party will get away with skirting campaign finance reform while the other one won't is ridiculous. They're ALL going to get around this law.

They all will, but my point is the difference is that the democrats and their friends in the media will hold Republicans accountable if they so much as even try to get around the law, while skirting the law themselves.

44 posted on 12/11/2003 8:42:14 PM PST by lowbridge (As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly. -Mr. Carlson, WKRP in Cincinnati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
So Bush ignored a huge public outcry against this measure? I don't recall any such outrage by the "masses".

He took an Oath. He swore to uphold the Constitution. He doesn't need the "masses" to be outraged to do his [expletive deleted] job. He should do the proper thing anyway! Sheesh!

45 posted on 12/11/2003 10:55:30 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Oh, but those of us that complained when it was signed were told to shut up, support Bush right or wrong, and not to worry...there was NO WAY the Supreme Court was going to uphold this ridiculous law.

Now they tell me I'm a fool not to fully support Bush in 2004 since I'm such a "purist" and will just "elect Dean". Funny, not ONE vote has been cast in any Democratic primary and I'm already electing Dean president.

So who are the true "purists"?
46 posted on 12/11/2003 11:04:38 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekMom
BCRA = Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
47 posted on 12/11/2003 11:05:09 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
these people ought to have their tes%$#@!#@$#les removed and put into a lock box!





Apologies to Rush Limbaugh

ROFL...you listen to him also! I loved it yesterday!
48 posted on 12/11/2003 11:05:57 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
You assume they follow the law! Boy, I have bridges to sell you!
49 posted on 12/11/2003 11:06:51 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shanscom
Zach Wamp is getting senile in his old age.
50 posted on 12/11/2003 11:07:35 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor
EXCELLENT POST!

Bush could have vetoed this bill and came out a HERO for free speech.
51 posted on 12/11/2003 11:08:24 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MeekMom
Oh my! ...now what happens?

Isn't it obvious. We throw up our hands and shout. We elect 435 Democrats to the HoR, 100 Democrats to the S, and 2 Democrats to the WH. We'll show those Republicans we are not dumb ...
We have principles ...

52 posted on 12/11/2003 11:09:13 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Wrong, all Bush had to do was veto the CFR and it would have died.

But he doesn't even understand the word "veto". I bet he thinks it's a character in "The Godfather".
53 posted on 12/11/2003 11:09:58 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: technomage
Wake up technomage...the long term goal is to become the Democratic Party of the last 60 years while (after the purge of the far left in the DNC) the Dems become the Republican Party of the last 60 years.

And since time moves much faster today, it won't take 60 years to take over again. Once all the old, FDR loving farts are dead, the Hillary wing will take the young with them and move centrism back into the majority and, get this, actually ATTACK the GOP as fiscally irresponsible, pork barrel addicted, unaccountable bureaucrats, etc.

And, of course, the GOP will just stock up on KY jelly and just beg them to use a condom...again.
54 posted on 12/11/2003 11:14:16 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
... how much worse will it be if President Dean appoints the next few Supremes?

No worse than the jerks the GOP appointed that vote against the Constitution. Or won't stop the Dems from putting people like Ruth Buzzie Ginsburg on the court.

Thomas, Scalia and Renquist...that's about it! You can't rely on Kennedy or O'Conner and the rest are senile.

55 posted on 12/11/2003 11:16:38 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl
If the opposing point of view can't pay to put it on TV when it matters...what will they do with the loss of half their revenue? Is it worth it?

Wake up. The #1 TV show in America, CSI, only gets 25 million viewers a week. They aren't risking any revenue whatsoever.

56 posted on 12/11/2003 11:18:17 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
AMEN!
57 posted on 12/11/2003 11:18:46 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
The country is still approximately HALF liberal/Democrat...

Prove it.

The polls that are well done and scientific have it as 30% Dem, 33% GOP and 35% Independent with 2% that don't know what planet they live on.

58 posted on 12/11/2003 11:20:58 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
{Zach Wamp is getting senile in his old age.}

I believe Wamp is positioning himself to run for Bill Frist's Senate seat in 2006.
59 posted on 12/11/2003 11:21:24 PM PST by Kuksool (With liberal hostility toward Xmas, no wonder people of faith are abandoning the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
I won't vote for him. And if Frist is still Majority Leader, he'll run again in 2006.
60 posted on 12/11/2003 11:22:37 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson