Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Children of married parents do better in life
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 12/12/2003 | Sarah Womack

Posted on 12/12/2003 12:07:10 PM PST by TheMole

Children of married parents do better in life
By Sarah Womack, Social Affairs Correspondent
(Filed: 12/12/2003)

Children born out of wedlock suffer financially, according to an official study released yesterday.

The study of 18,500 babies shows that married parents are less likely to claim income support.

They are also more likely to own a property and live on an income of at least £20,000 a year.

The survey found that 60 per cent of parents who had children in 2000-2002 were married, 25 per cent were co-habiting and 15 per cent were not married or living together.

Only 7.8 per cent of married couples were classed as "poor" compared to 76.4 per cent of parents who did not live together, and 25 per cent of co-habiting parents.

John Haskey, from the Office for National Statistics, which published the figures, said the study had far-reaching implications.

Children born out of wedlock were not only disadvantaged at birth, he said. "It seems that this will go on throughout the life of those children," he added.

Mr Haskey said the study raised the question of how social policy should be formulated.

He asked: "Should the Government be encouraging marriage, or at least encouraging people to stay together in a stable relationship?" Only 1.7 per cent of single parents had a "high income" compared to 17.4 per cent of co-habiting parents (with a joint income of £31,200 or more) and 33.5 per cent of married parents (also with a joint income of £31,200 or more).

The number of single parents on income support was 69.8 per cent. The number of married parents on income support dropped to just 3.2 per cent.

And while 81.1 per cent of married parents owned their own home, only 12.2 per cent of single parents did so, with 58.4 per cent of them living in council housing.

Ministers have so far been unwilling to act to reverse the decline of the instutition of marriage.

The study was the first of its kind to break down the strength of the relationship between the parents who were not living together at the time their child was born.

While 7.2 per cent were closely involved at the time of birth, 4.4 per cent were not in a relationship, 2.4 per cent were friends and one per cent were separated or divorced.

Fathers who were closely involved with mothers at the time of birth were most likely to end up moving in with them.

"It is clear that children born to single, non-cohabiting parents are the most disadvantaged," the study said.

The findings highlighted the "complexity and fuzziness" of parental relationships in the new millennium.

"The most advantaged children are those born to married parents," it concluded.

"The co-habiting couples are substantially better off than the single parents not living with anyone, but are more disadvantaged than their married counterparts."

The figures showed that only 32.6 per cent of all absent fathers paid child maintenance.



TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: britain; children; family; marriage; motherandfather; singlemothers; telegraph; womack
A surprisingly straightforward study. It's somewhat surprising that it was allowed out in public by the UK bureaucracy. The link above goes to the print version of the stry: This link should go to the original page. This link and this link will take you to summaries of a similar, but probably even more definitive, Swedish study that was published in The Lancet earlier this year.
1 posted on 12/12/2003 12:07:10 PM PST by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheMole
SPOTREP - SOCIOLOGY - FAMILY
2 posted on 12/12/2003 12:12:46 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
My ex didn't leave until the kids were out of the house.

28 yo son - CPA, CFP who mostly consults for other financial planners, MBA, state boad of accountancy, speaker at financial planning conferences. Married to wonder young lady.

25 year old son - airline captain, started as airline pilot at age 21.

23 yo daughter - nursing student.

We did O.K. Acutally, we wee blessed as I know many parents whose children chose destructive paths through what appeared to be no fault of the parentrs, but you can never say for sure.

End of bragging.

3 posted on 12/12/2003 12:13:59 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
Boy, the results of this study get a big "DUH". Like, tell us something we don't know.
4 posted on 12/12/2003 12:15:16 PM PST by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blau993
YA' THINK!!!!
5 posted on 12/12/2003 12:16:18 PM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blau993
Must be from the Center of 'No Sh!t Sherlock'.
6 posted on 12/12/2003 12:17:25 PM PST by ItsOurTimeNow (Criswell - "And remember, my friends, future events such as these will affect you in the future.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
Glad to read an article like this. The ideas isn't to feel sorry for oneself or to see this as self-defeating.

It is just that the liberal media has lied to us about this. I remember reading an article in People Magazine (I think it was) that claimed divorce does not harm the kids.

BS. I come from a split family. It was hell living under an evil stepmother. I remember crying when I had to leave my mother after a visit in the summer.

It doesn't mean I'm doomed to become some sort of psychopath. But to say it didn't affect me or my sister is a load of bull. It is an excuse for the boomer generation to justify leaving their marriages.

I think when I worry too much, or don't trust my instinct, all stem from a broken household. I don't intend to exuse my actions now, but just to argue that psychologically a broken family IS damaging to the children.

But the media has also lied to us about divorce stats - according the Michael Medved. The divorce rate is somewhere between 15 and 20% in America, not 50%. This figure is misleading and was based on one year of study. I imagine the press likes to use it before it re-inforces a defeatest attitude. "Everyone else is divorcing. Why not me?"
7 posted on 12/12/2003 12:24:29 PM PST by Dunedain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
LOL That's one of my favourite expressions!
8 posted on 12/12/2003 12:24:59 PM PST by Dunedain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
Even puppies tend to take on the habits of their mommas....
9 posted on 12/12/2003 12:29:09 PM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dunedain
Awesome screen-name. Are you too descended from Numenor?
10 posted on 12/12/2003 12:39:59 PM PST by ItsOurTimeNow (Criswell - "And remember, my friends, future events such as these will affect you in the future.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
Ministers have so far been unwilling to act to reverse the decline of the instutition of marriage.

Of course not. To do any thing about the greatest threat to Western Civilization would be to gore a scared Socialist Cow and offend the Feminazis.

It is a most halloed part of the Left’s dogma that children do not need fathers and Mothers are probably better off with out husbands. To suggest otherwise is to commit heresy.

Social Engineering is the name of the game for the Left unless it is in support of traditional values.

11 posted on 12/12/2003 12:42:30 PM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
Here's another breakthgough study!

Rocks Sink in Water!

12 posted on 12/12/2003 12:55:46 PM PST by leadpencil1 (Neds Atomic Dustbin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
I'd like to think so. :)
13 posted on 12/12/2003 1:16:18 PM PST by Dunedain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
Didn't Dan Quayle point this out many many years ago...
14 posted on 12/12/2003 1:33:13 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson