1 posted on
12/14/2003 6:34:19 PM PST by
drdemars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: drdemars
No, I didn't
2 posted on
12/14/2003 6:35:57 PM PST by
Chad Fairbanks
(“...how can I use the bathroom when my people are in bondage?”)
To: drdemars
And, you're going to take his word over Janeane Garofalo's?
3 posted on
12/14/2003 6:36:11 PM PST by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: drdemars
Hey, Sad-dam, what's this plastics shredder for? Now, again, where are the WMD's? [bvvvvrrrrrrrrrRRRRRRRRRR]
4 posted on
12/14/2003 6:36:57 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: drdemars
Yes, he said some [WMD] went to Iran, some to Syria, and some in a lab under Baghdad. Said there was a family all suffering from cancer from transporting enriched uranium to Iran. Said there was an informant holding out until proof of Saddam's death, capture, or his safe haven was ensured. Pretty convincing if you buy that Mansoor is in the know.
6 posted on
12/14/2003 6:38:45 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
To: drdemars
Yeah, Ijaz said that much of the WMD's (including uranium) was sent to Iran and Syria.
7 posted on
12/14/2003 6:40:28 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: drdemars
IMHO, Ijaz is about as reliable as NEIN. It was like Debka.com saying that Saddam had been taken captive by Iraqis before we found him. They completely make up stuff.
8 posted on
12/14/2003 6:41:06 PM PST by
mikegi
To: drdemars
Yea I heard it....There was a scientist (?) and his wife and son that had developed cancer...they had been ordered to help move some nuclear material out of Iraq (and thus were exposed to radiation). (Iran & Syria ). He wouldn'd tell any more until
Saddam was caught, or proof of his death was available, or he and his family provided with security/new identities in some other country.
To: Admin Moderator
This thread contains actual news picked up from the O'Reilly Show. Why has it been moved to chat?
To: drdemars
yes, Mansoor put alot on the line in that OReilly segment, some bold statements.
To: drdemars
I heard it too. Yahoo!!! I believe Monsoor - he's not one for pipe dreams. O'Reilly bet him a steak dinner.
Monsoor said that by the State of the Union, we'd hear of the NBC, that's right NBC, not just bio and chem.
To: drdemars
I saw it. I'm hopeful Mansoor knows what he's talking about, he alluded to knowing even more he couldn't talk about. I feel a little petty to immediately think political implications, but this is huge for Pres Bush obviously, and if Mansoor's goods pan out, slam dunk time!
To: drdemars
My recollection is that Ijaz said that details on chemical, biological and on nuclear arms would soon be forthcoming. The weapons were sent in part to Syria and in part to Iran.
Bill asked him if he was sure of what he was saying, and he said he was. Bill couldn't believe what he was hearing, said jokingly "you willing to bet on this?" and Ijaz said that O'reilly already owed him a steak dinner...
25 posted on
12/14/2003 7:10:32 PM PST by
Foamfollower
(the world is a better place today)
To: drdemars
This is what I heard...
Mansoor Ijaz on Bill O'Reilly's Sunday's O'Reilly Factor claimed that the US now has an Iraqi who claims to now where Saddam's WMD is located. This source was waiting for either proof of Saddam's death, capture or relocation of his family in a third country.
Ijaz claimed that this informer had transported enriched uranium into Iran. This informer is alleged to now have cancer as a result of this contact with enriched uranium.
He also claims to know of its transport into Syria and the location of a secret lab in Iraq.
Ijaz predicted that prior to Bush's state of the union we will have found the long sought after WMD's.
27 posted on
12/14/2003 7:11:20 PM PST by
DoctorZIn
(Until they are free, we shall all be Iranians!)
To: drdemars
Oh yes!
He said that not only would Chem and Bio be found but that Nuc too would be found. Not just labs but Weapons grade stuff and a capability.
He said enjoy the reaction come the State of the Union Speech.
Amazingly he's been right more often that the so called experts from the retirement circles of the Pentagon and Politics and the pencil heads from Academia
36 posted on
12/14/2003 7:19:44 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: drdemars
I really like Monsoor and believe he is 'in the know'.
Time will tell......
37 posted on
12/14/2003 7:20:12 PM PST by
mickie
To: drdemars
We all knew it had to be found sooner or later. Dr. Kayes reports alluded to information he was working on, all the hints were there, the dems were too stupid to take heed. Now they are going to look totally ridiculous.
To: drdemars
I want Saddam to answer only one question.
Did that hurt?
46 posted on
12/14/2003 7:38:57 PM PST by
vikzilla
To: drdemars
Well...I happen to KNOW with undeniable assurance that WMD doesn't exist in Iraq. A simple matter of observation.
I was watching MSNBC and the segment was on the search for WMD. David Kay's team was searching a suspected bioweapons storage site. As I watched I has this odd feeling and couldn't put my finger on it. I watched them entering bunkers with detection equipment and rummaging arround the site. Lots of professional talk about chemical and bio-weapons etc. Then it hit me like a ton of bricks. What made my hair stand up was what I WASN'T seeing.
If they were searching for dangerous bioweapons then why were none of the specialists in mop suits or biohazard gear? Were they gonna just trust to luck that none of the bioweapons containers seals were broken or there were no booby traps on the bioweapons? Strange behavior for bio and chemical weapons experts.
1)If they believed that there was the remotest chance of bioweapons being in these bunkers they would be wearing mop suits or biochem hazard gear.
2) If they knew with absolute assurance that biochem weapons DID NOT exist then they wouldn't wear biochem gear.
Quod Erat Demonstratum.. WMD's don't exist in Iraq. At least that's what the experts believe with an extraordinary degree of confidence. They bet their lives on it.
50 posted on
12/14/2003 7:55:26 PM PST by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: drdemars
Yes, I heard him say that! He said that the "agent" said that 3 things were necessary for him to tell the U.S. where Saddam's "stuff" is.1)that Saddam be either killed or captured, 2)Money and 3)that he be sent to another country.Can anybody else confirm this part? Thanks.
53 posted on
12/14/2003 8:01:22 PM PST by
Lady In Blue
(President Bush-"Avenger of the bones....Shiekh of Shiekhs")
To: drdemars; DoctorZIn
I heard part of it.
DoctorZIn summarized it in a post on another thread:
=====
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1040014/posts?page=45#45 Post by DoctorZIn about Mnsoor Ijaz's statement on O'Reilly factor:
====
Iran has Saddam's Enriched Uranium?
Mansoor Ijaz on Bill O'Reilly's Sunday's O'Reilly Factor claimed that the US now has an Iraqi who claims to now where Saddam's WMD is located. This source was waiting for either proof of Saddam's death, capture or relocation of his family in a third country.
Ijaz claimed that this informer had transported enriched uranium into Iran. This informer is alleged to now have cancer as a result of this contact with enriched uranium.
He also claims to know of its transport into Syria and the location of a secret lab in Iraq.
Ijaz predicted that prior to Bush's state of the union we will have found the long sought after WMD's.
45 posted on 12/14/2003 6:47:57 PM PST by DoctorZIn (Until they are free, we shall all be Iranians!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson