To: drdemars
IMHO, Ijaz is about as reliable as NEIN. It was like Debka.com saying that Saddam had been taken captive by Iraqis before we found him. They completely make up stuff.
8 posted on
12/14/2003 6:41:06 PM PST by
mikegi
To: mikegi
Ijaz is only one man but he is a bit more reliable than those sources.
11 posted on
12/14/2003 6:45:19 PM PST by
GeronL
(Is your Tagline weak, limp and ineffective? Has it hurt your relationship? Try TiAGra today!!!!)
To: mikegi
I tend to think Monsoor knows where he's coming from. I know now that Saddam is cooling his heels and powerless many will come forward with revelations hereto held back for fear of retaliation.
13 posted on
12/14/2003 6:47:36 PM PST by
drdemars
(Each moment I live a healthy life)
To: mikegi
44 posted on
12/14/2003 7:32:05 PM PST by
ConservativeMan55
(A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
To: mikegi
No.
But they do
HAVE A WIDER VARIETY,
WIDER QUALITY,
WIDER DIVERSITY
of sources than CNN does.
48 posted on
12/14/2003 7:44:04 PM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: mikegi
Ijaz said a few weeks ago that we would capture Saddam in a few weeks. Today's news gives him a ton of credibility.
65 posted on
12/14/2003 8:44:21 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(The U.N. is a terrorist organization)
To: mikegi
No, not Monsoor. He has been right on. I trust what he says. We'll have to wait and see.
76 posted on
12/14/2003 9:07:39 PM PST by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson