Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(BREAKING NEWS)Libya's Fatal Blow to Axis of Evil (Islamic Regime in Iran IMPLICATED)
Sunday Herald ^ | Dec 21, 2003 | David Pratt and Trevor Royle

Posted on 12/20/2003 4:53:21 PM PST by faludeh_shirazi

.INVESTIGATION.

Gaddafi deal signals end to secret nuclear weapon programme with Iran and North Korea..

By David Pratt, Foreign Editor, and Trevor Royle, Diplomatic Editor

Free Iran at ActivistChat.com!

THE end of the threat posed to world peace and secure oil supplies by the “axis of evil” is emerging this weekend as the real prize that Tony Blair and George Bush have secured for Christmas.

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi took the decision to renounce all weapons of mass destruction (WMD) on Friday night, but while at first it was thought this only had implications for Libya it is now clear that his decision has scuppered a secret partnership between Libya, Iran and North Korea formed with the intention of developing an independent nuclear weapon.

New documents revealed yesterday show that the three were working on the nuclear weapons programme at a top-secret underground site near the Kufra Oasis of the Sahara in southeastern Libya. The team was made up of North Korean scientists, engineers and technicians, as well as some Iranian and Libyan nuclear scientists.

North Korea and Iran, originally dubbed by Bush as the axis of evil along with Iraq, avoided detection by the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) inspectors by each member farming out vital sections of its projects to its fellow members.

Iran, which is now in the final stages of uranium enrichment for its program, is badly hit, having counted on fitting into place key parts of its WMD project made in Libya. North Korea may also be forced to scale back the production of nuclear devices as well as counting the loss of a lucrative source of income for its Scuds and nuclear technology.

Yesterday, Tripoli acted swiftly to prove its commitment to the world at large when the head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, met a senior Libyan official in Vienna to discuss eliminating the programme.

Almost 15 years to the day since Gaddafi’s agents brought down a PanAm jet over Lockerbie and eight months after US and British troops toppled Saddam Hussein, the Libyan leader has now opened the prospect of an end to sanctions and a return of US oil firms.

The news has delighted three American oil companies, Marathon, Amerada Hess, and ConocoPhillips whose Libyan leases were about to expire. They all pulled out of Libya in 1986 after the US imposed strict sanctions against the regime.

Tripoli’s announcement on Friday was the culmination of secret talks with Britain and the US launched around the time of the Iraq invasion. The initial approach to discuss how to bring Libya in from the cold was made by Libya’s chief of intelligence, Musa Qusa, who contacted the British government in March, amid preparations for war on Iraq.

“You could say that these discussions followed on from the Lockerbie contacts,” a spokesman for Blair said yesterday. It was in March that the deal was done by Libya to settle with the families of the victims of Pan Am Flight 103.

Months of secret diplomatic activity followed which led to the clandestine three-week visit to at least 10 sites in Libya. British and US weapons experts who inspected laboratories and military factories in October and early December established that Libyan scientists were “developing a nuclear fuel cycle intended to support nuclear weapons development.” The British team also saw “significant quantities of chemical agent” and “bombs designed to be filled with chemical agent.”

Following the visit, Sir Nigel Sheinwald, Blair’s national security adviser, and Condoleezza Rice, Bush’s national security adviser, held intense negotiations with Libyan officials in the days leading up to Friday’s declaration.

Blair had his first-ever telephone conversation with Gaddafi on Thursday, in which they discussed the declaration.

Libya finally transmitted the statement to British officials at about 9pm and, after trans lation and an “assessment” on both sides of the Atlantic, it was released to the press at about 10.15pm.

The breakthrough capped a week of positive developments for London and Washington that began with the capture of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and followed with a pledge from Iran to submit to unfettered inspections of its nuclear industry.

Bush implied in his remarks at the White House on Friday that there would now be reciprocity. “As the Libyan government takes these essential steps and demonstrates its seriousness, its good faith will be returned. Libya can regain a secure and respected place among the nations, and over time, achieve far better relations with the United States.”

Gaddafi’s move also sounds a warning for Israel. If Washington manages to dispose of Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s unconventional weaponry, attention will focus on Israel as the only remaining Middle Eastern nuclear power.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iaea; iran; libya; mrterror; northkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: faludeh_shirazi
State of the Union speech, coming up!

Get ready.

Will her heinous roll her eyes.

Will Schumer smirk.

Will Daschle be absent from the hall.

41 posted on 12/20/2003 5:26:37 PM PST by OldFriend ( BLESS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: faludeh_shirazi
The news has delighted three American oil companies, Marathon, Amerada Hess, and ConocoPhillips whose Libyan leases were about to expire. They all pulled out of Libya in 1986 after the US imposed strict sanctions against the regime.

Predicted Liberal/Media Spin = "it's all just about oil for Bush & Cheney's cronies".

42 posted on 12/20/2003 5:26:37 PM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faludeh_shirazi
Maybe you're being optimistic. Kaddafi's capitulation on nukes is only a piece of the story - the other key fact is that the US will now accommodate him. The latter is not a message you'd be willing to send to other rogue states - their very existence is the problem, not just their weapons.
43 posted on 12/20/2003 5:29:10 PM PST by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: faludeh_shirazi
If the Nobel Peace Prize were not so debased by some of it's recent recipients I would nominate President Bush and P.M. Blair for the next one.
44 posted on 12/20/2003 5:29:24 PM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faludeh_shirazi
Patience, grasshopper.

First, you try with the honey. IF that doesn't work, then you try the carrot.

If those do not work, then you show a Really Big Stick with the implied thread that we will use it.

I think it's almost time to take away the carrot, and bring in the big stick, like this one:


45 posted on 12/20/2003 5:30:47 PM PST by Maigrey (Founding Member of the Jack Straw Fan Club!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: faludeh_shirazi
I believe you are precisely correct.

There will be no need to "attack" Iran. But there will be every reason to assist those Iranians on the side of freedom.

Iran will undergo a (mostly) peaceful revolution and rejoin the community of nations.

46 posted on 12/20/2003 5:32:05 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: faludeh_shirazi
Iraq was also a partner, according to the Debka article. If so, then Qadaffi had TWO reasons for giving in:

1) He feared he would suffer the same fate as Saddam.

2) He feared that Saddam would rat on him.

Saddam's capture was key for both these reasons. And this will now put a lot of pressure on China to stop helping their North Korean friends defy us.
47 posted on 12/20/2003 5:32:15 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
From the Debka article you posted: "More than a year ago, on October 25, 2002, DEBKA-Net-Weekly revealed that Libya aided by North Korea was working on a nuclear weapons program at a top-secret underground site near the Kufra Oasis of the Sahara in southeastern Libya. The team was made up of North Korean scientists, engineers and technicians, as well as 200-300 Iraqi nuclear scientists, whose salaries are paid to this day – possibly out of Saddam’s secret bank accounts which are controlled by his cousin Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikrity.

The two Arab dictators were therefore partners in the development of a nuclear bomb. If Sharon’s intelligence was correct, the deposed Iraqi ruler would have been in a position to arm himself with a jointly-funded nuclear weapon at the same time as Qaddafi, by mid-2004. A small band of Iraqi scientists carrying the necessary items would have simply joined the traffic of Arab combatants and terrorists heading into Iraq through Syria and brought the weapons into the country. "

===

This should send chills down everyone's back.

If we hadn't invaded Iraq when we did, by next year, it may have been too late!

48 posted on 12/20/2003 5:32:48 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I'm thinking it was an open secret.

Yet there are some people that are extremely skeptical of Debka.

49 posted on 12/20/2003 5:32:48 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Not that I have ANY sympathy for him, but I would suggest that Gaddafi increase his guard coverage. He just painted a bullseye right between his eyes. The partners of this clandestine alliance as well as other muslims are not going to take too well to his capitualtion to the U.S. and G.B.
50 posted on 12/20/2003 5:32:54 PM PST by gooleyman (Roll ON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
"Add another notch to the "dumb Texans" grip and take away another one from the "smartest woman in the world".
Dubya' is the President with the most uncanny leadership since Churchill!"


Oh, no you don't! Not so fast there...we ALL know this is just more of dickcheney'sformercompany pulling another fast one and it has nothing to do with WMD that do NOT (nor have ever) existed and after all, this is costing the American taxpayer a gazillion-billion dollars that SHOULD be going for more medical care to the 100 million poor people who can't afford...blah, blah, blah.


51 posted on 12/20/2003 5:34:14 PM PST by Maria S ("…the end is near…this time, Americans are serious; Bush is not like Clinton." Uday Hussein 4/9/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
"Bush and Blair bluffed that the plans were all drawn up for Libyan invasion."

==

What makes you think it was a bluff? Bush didn't bluff about Afghanistan or Iraq. I am sure if Kadafi hadn't seen the light now, we may well have seen a spring invasion into Libya.
52 posted on 12/20/2003 5:34:19 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: okie01
I agree. Iranian students and others are all ready to go. Rather than intervene directly, we will do better to go after the last remaining holdout in the area, Syria. That would completely isolate the Iranian Mullahs. Then we could, if necessary, lean on the Iranian regime, but not invade.
53 posted on 12/20/2003 5:34:41 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I keep telling everyone that Debka is months ahead of everyone in their information...

This is just another example.
54 posted on 12/20/2003 5:35:54 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Israel will not give up its nukes.

-----
Israel SHOULDN'T give up anything. They have the most to lose in any of this and are NOT threatening ANYONE. Israel cannot even "appear" to show any signs of weakness. We see what happens everytime they get a namby-pamby leader who starts down that road. NO WAY!!!
55 posted on 12/20/2003 5:37:38 PM PST by gooleyman (Roll ON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; SauronOfMordor
It looks like when Iraq fell, Gaddafi had lost the country he was going to sell the bomb to - so he had nothing to lose, and much to gain, by trading his WMDs for the dropping of US sanctions.
56 posted on 12/20/2003 5:46:57 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
No offense, but many (myself included) feel they are a questionable source (to say the least).

And if this source that backs up Debka is so reliable, then why did it get pulled by the Mods from breaking news?

Not trying to pss on anyones parade, but how many WMDs FOUND!!! threads did we suffer through during the war?

Yawn....until Washington Times or FNN picks it up.

57 posted on 12/20/2003 5:49:30 PM PST by icwhatudo (The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I keep telling everyone that Debka is months ahead of everyone in their information...

This is just another example.

And this is right twice a day:

Still wanting for the thousands of Chinese ready to fight alongside the Afgans.

58 posted on 12/20/2003 5:52:56 PM PST by proust (Debka: Proof that if you throw enough stuff somethings bound to stick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
State of the Union speech, coming up!...Get ready...Will her heinous roll her eyes...

-----
It would be nice to have Osama in the clink by then. I would like to see all the DemocRATS sit on their hands and show disrespect. Time to bring in the Iraqi ruling body (whatever they call themselves... the ones working to form a Constitution and a Government) like they did the Afghanistan President last year, and have them sit with Laura on the balcony. I Can't wait to see it.
59 posted on 12/20/2003 5:55:49 PM PST by gooleyman (Roll ON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: faludeh_shirazi
Ping for later read! PTL!
60 posted on 12/20/2003 5:56:02 PM PST by RoseofTexas (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson