Skip to comments.
Saddam was held by Kurdish forces, drugged and left for US troops
Yahoo! News ^
| 12/20/03
Posted on 12/20/2003 10:19:07 PM PST by woofie
LONDON, (AFP) - Saddam Hussein was captured by US troops only after he had been taken prisoner by Kurdish forces, drugged and abandoned ready for American soldiers to recover him, a British Sunday newspaper said.
Saddam came into the hands of the Kurdish Patriotic Front after being betrayed to the group by a member of the al-Jabour tribe, whose daughter had been raped by Saddam's son Uday, leading to a blood feud, reported the Sunday Express, which quoted an unnamed senior British military intelligence officer.
The newspaper said the full story of events leading up to the ousted Iraqi president's capture on December 13 near his hometown of Tikrit in northern Iraq (news - web sites), "exposes the version peddled by American spin doctors as incomplete".
A former Iraqi intelligence officer, whom the Express did not name, told the paper that Saddam was held prisoner by a leader of the Kurdish Patriotic Front, which fought alongside US forces during the Iraq war, until he negotiated a deal.
The deal apparently involved the group gaining political advantage in the region.
An unnamed Western intelligence source in the Middle East told the Express: "Saddam was not captured as a result of any American or British intelligence. We knew that someone would eventually take their revenge, it was just a matter of time."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: kurds; puk; rasulali; reddawn; saddam; viceisclosed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
1
posted on
12/20/2003 10:19:07 PM PST
by
woofie
To: woofie
I guess thats why he had a gun on him
2
posted on
12/20/2003 10:19:43 PM PST
by
woofie
To: woofie
DU is lapping up this garbage
3
posted on
12/20/2003 10:20:51 PM PST
by
woofie
To: woofie
I wonder if there would have been enough DNA left to identify him, had the Kurds gotten to Saddahm first.
4
posted on
12/20/2003 10:21:30 PM PST
by
Ruth A.
To: woofie
Oh please. Any Kurd who found him would be wearing his testicles on a keychain and carrying his head on a pike.
5
posted on
12/20/2003 10:21:44 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(The Federal judiciary is a terrorist organization)
To: woofie
Someone wants to be the next Robert fisk, evidently.
6
posted on
12/20/2003 10:22:24 PM PST
by
PianoMan
(And now back to practicing)
To: woofie
Just when did Britain sink into a cesspool of Leftist sh*t?
7
posted on
12/20/2003 10:23:39 PM PST
by
Az Joe
To: woofie
This is the second similar conspiracy theory about this.
"Captors" would not leave Saddam with $750,000 US cash and a sidearm. Period.
To: woofie
I'm getting pretty suspicious of Yahoo news...
They seem to lean so far left, that they get poo poo on one leg...
Semper Fi
9
posted on
12/20/2003 10:24:24 PM PST
by
river rat
To: woofie
None of this diminishes the fact that the US soldiers discovered him and Saddam IS now in captivity.
To: woofie
I guess thats why he had a gun on him And three quarters of a million in $US.
11
posted on
12/20/2003 10:25:39 PM PST
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy.)
To: woofie
This sounds like bilgewater smells.
12
posted on
12/20/2003 10:26:43 PM PST
by
IronJack
To: woofie
Saddam Hussein was captured by US troops only after he had been taken prisoner by Kurdish forces, drugged and abandoned ready for American soldiers to recover him, a British Sunday newspaper said. Breaking news, monkeys to fly out of my butt, film at eleven.
To: woofie
DEBKA in Russia tried to peddle this line earlier this week.
When I look at the Express website, one of their "news stories" is:
Sagittarians 'are top speeders'
Sagittarians speed more on the roads than others, while Librans are least bothered by congestion, according to a new survey. ...
To: river rat
I'm suspicious of all of them. They lie and spew so fast it's hard to keep up with them. What was the crap CBS was reporting last week blaming Bush for 9-11,using Tom Kean as a fop? It's really ridiculous.
Does the left know how stupid they look? Think Yahoo, think toilet.
15
posted on
12/20/2003 10:29:00 PM PST
by
Luke21
To: Luke21
Yahoo mostly has stories from Reuters and AFP, which explains a lot.
16
posted on
12/20/2003 10:30:53 PM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
To: woofie
This is so dubious that even the guys at DEBKA are saying "Schmucks!"
To: humblegunner
What kind of monkeys?
To: woofie
If the Kurds had captured him he would have been found in thousands of little 1" pieces.
To: Az Joe
>>>Just when did Britain sink into a cesspool of Leftist sh*t?If you're really serious, it started right after WWII. Socialized medicine, welfare payments and liberalized drug laws. American liberals of the 1960`s saw the political capital that could be gained from British social policy and applied it to the good old USA. LBJ created "The Great Society" and the era of BIG GOVERNMENT has been with us ever since.
20
posted on
12/20/2003 10:35:31 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson