Wives hire other women to test 'cheating' men

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | December 21, 2003

[nickcarraway]

More spouses paying 'honey-trap girls' to gauge husbands' fidelity

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suspicious wives are increasingly hiring so-called "honey-trap girls" to purposely come on to their husbands to test their commitments to their marriages.

According to a report in the Melbourne Herald Sun, women are paying licensed investigators to flirt with their husbands to see how they will react.

"It's a very rewarding job. I love it," Amber confessed to the paper. She had just spent time with a client's husband in a bar. The man, married four years with two young children, gave Amber his telephone number before the evening was over.

"I never let them kiss me, and it's not entrapment because I never ask them for anything," she points out. Entrapment, where the woman initiates contact with the man, is illegal in the area Amber plies her trade.

The woman explained she "smiled in a flirtatious way" when the man first entered the bar.

According to the report, clients are paying thousands of dollars for such fidelity checks. In Europe, the Australian paper said, a company called The Honey Trap is advertising for attractive recruits.

Don Doolan, president of the Association of Investigators and Security Professionals, told the Herald Sun demand for such services is booming in Australia.

"These techniques have always been used, but in the past 10 years there has probably been a five-fold increase," he said.

The process involves getting the attention of the "target" and then waiting for him to make the first move. Doolan says that often happens in a matter of minutes.

"Most blokes think below their belly button," Doolan told the paper.

The manager of another service, Kirri Cleaver of Gotcha Enterprises, says 40 percent of the targeted men do not tell the female investigator they are in a committed relationship.

One investigator shared an even worse statistic.

"In our experience, subjects are innocent in only about 10 percent of cases," Dalla Riva is quoted as saying.

Said Cleaver:"Women don't want to waste their time, or be used or have their heart broken. You buy a house, you're going to have it checked for rising damp, but you get into a relationship and nobody asks any questions."

[Lazamataz]

"Most blokes think below their belly button," Doolan told the paper."

Is this true?

Yes.

Most of us think with our ass.

[anniegetyourgun]

Are you sure you aren't just speaking for yourself, Laz? ; )

[dwilli]

Why is this any less trusting than a pre-nuptial agreement?

[NRA2BFree]

"Most blokes think below their belly button," Doolan told the paper.

Is this true?

Oh, I'm sure it is. ALL my ex could do was think about anything below his belly button. LOL!

[dadokane]

While they're at it, shouldn't wives also check their hubby's with gays?

[dwilli]

Giving or getting a phone number is not exactly "flirting".

[dadokane]

Ummmm, shudda added, my wife busted me with a sheep...

[Bluntpoint]

Wives hire other women to test 'cheating' men

Paul Begala's wife should hire another man for her test.

[Lazamataz]

:o(

[Lazamataz]

While they're at it, shouldn't wives also check their hubby's with gays?

And Sears wet-and-dry vacs?

[Lazamataz]

While they're at it, shouldn't wives also check their hubby's with gays?

And badger badger badger badger badger badger MUSHROOM MUSHROOM.

[NRA2BFree]

Just imagine what the NOW gang and other feminazis would do if male models were hired to check out the faithfulness of girlfriends and wives.

Oh, I imagine there are plenty of men who check up on their wives like this. Cheating is a selfish act that leaves a lot of hurting people in the aftermath.

[anniegetyourgun]

If it is true that "most blokes think below their belly button," then it might be good to check with anything that moves or doesn't.

[krb]

I have found that women who have such a childish proclivity to distrust are themselves distrustful.

I think you meant that women who have such a proclivity to distrust are themselves untrustworthy. What you said is redundant :-)

[R. Scott]

My sentiments exactly.

[Outrance]

That wife must be a truly charming woman. Through a deceitful subterfuge she has found out that her husband has very little affection for an insecure, deceitful woman and will offer his phone number like a rope thrown to a drowning man to the first pretty thing that bats her eyelashes. If she can't hold onto that man I doubt she will hold onto any other. Its a whole lot easier to get a man than to hold on to one.

(BTW, I have been married 25 yrs to the most interesting woman I have ever met and there isn't any woman on earth who is going get me from my wife. Its not a great feat when you are truly in love.)

[snopercod]

Take yesterday for instance.

When my wife got home from work, the house was clean, the firewood was stacked, the dishes were done, the windows were washed, the margarita was fixed, and I had a hot supper ready for her.

She flopped down in front of the TV and spent the rest of the evening bitching about what a crappy day she had at work.

What's wrong with this picture?

[JZoback]

Maybe if men would get a little more attention at home, there wouldn't be the temptation to look elsewhere.

I have always said

"Why eat a hamburger at a take out place when you can eat Ribeye at home"

[JZoback]

hen various studies have shown that 10-15% of all children born to married women have a different biological father than the husband.

Not that I doubt you saw that number stated somewhere, but I have a hard time believing it.

[e_engineer]

And Sears wet-and-dry vacs?

LOL!

Thanks, Now I have coffee-keyboard syndrome.