[Diogenesis]

Novak has betrayed the USA when he OUTED a CIA operative for his mistress(master) at the DNC.

So the question arises in reasonable people's minds: Can Novak believed at all?

[Ispy4u]

There are serious doubts as to whether the "operative" was much more than just an employee. I have met more than a few people who don't believe for a minute she was an "operative", that word implies a lot more than being in the employ of the CIA.

Don't take my word for it though.

[tbeatty]

A). I don't believe he "outed" her.

B). She wasn't an operative.

C). Novaks article was true. Why wouldn't you believe him now?

Her employment at the CIA as a WMD expert was well known and it seems kind of silly to believe that an "operatives" cover was as the spouse of someone in the employ of the US government in the area of WMD. She was an analyst.

[sinkspur]

Novak has betrayed the USA when he OUTED a CIA operative for his mistress(master) at the DNC.

Everybody knew who she was; it had been common knowledge for months.

Besides, why did the press wait six months after Novak's revelation to make big deal of it? Nobody said a word when he first made the "revelation".

[justshutupandtakeit]

That is completely false ( the product of diseased RATmedia minds). Novak "outed" no one. There is nothing secret about bureaucrats.

Just because the RATmedia tries to make it appear that she was some sort of secret agent does not make it so.