Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AbsoluteJustice
FACT:Rush admitted he was taking drugs.
FACT: this is illegal.

This fabricated "fact" of yours is not proven, yet AGAIN you falsly assert it as fact. You don't seem to be capable of learning. Even the simple 2 lines of reasoning you posted is not necessarily true in every case, anyhow.

FACT: Legal authroities believe there is probable cause to investigate Rush and 2 judges have agreed.

The method of getting Rush's records may have violated the 4th amendment, and Florida's right to privacy law. Which is why you are wrong again on your assertion:

The ruling has been either revoked or overturned.

I was thinking you were smart enough to quit making false statements of "fact", but I was so wrong.

205 posted on 12/26/2003 8:10:41 AM PST by HighWheeler (You can't play a violin very well after using a heavy hammer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: HighWheeler
"This fabricated "fact" of yours is not proven, yet AGAIN you falsly assert it as fact. You don't seem to be capable of learning. Even the simple 2 lines of reasoning you posted is not necessarily true in every case, anyhow. "

Not prooven!!???
So I guess it also not prooven that the drug abuser checked himself in to a clinic because he was not abusing drugs?
Huh?
He admitted right on the air he was abusing prescrition medication. This is a crime. This is not subject to disupte. This is a fact not realitvism reasoning.

"The method of getting Rush's records may have violated the 4th amendment, and Florida's right to privacy law. Which is why you are wrong again on your assertion:"

Two judges have not seen it this way. So in your point of view because an unpopular decision has been rendered against a person you like it is not just? what will it take 10 Judges? SCOTUS? What if they side with the prosecution will you still say it is unjust?

210 posted on 12/26/2003 8:15:44 AM PST by AbsoluteJustice (By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: HighWheeler
"The method of getting Rush's records may have violated the 4th amendment, and Florida's right to privacy law. Which is why you are wrong again on your assertion:


The ruling has been either revoked or overturned."

No - it has not been, otherwise the records would have been ordered returned.

In FACT, from the hearing on Monday this is the second Judge to rule on the legallity of the search warrents.
By resealing the records he is simply allowing time for another appeal.
252 posted on 12/26/2003 9:57:17 AM PST by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson