Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Plan to Save American Manufacturing
TradeAlert.org ^ | Wednesday, December 31, 2003 | Kevin L. Kearns, Alan Tonelson, and William Hawkins

Posted on 01/01/2004 9:04:11 AM PST by Willie Green

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-458 next last
To: AmericanVictory
Can you tell us anything further about the authorship and the supporting organization? Are there links that will help in finding out more?

TradeAlert.org was founded by the U.S. Business and Industry Council Educational Foundation, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit research and educational organization dedicated to improving the American people's awareness of critical public policy issues in such diverse fields as trade, taxation, education, health care, foreign relations, defense, and national security, among others. USBICEF is affiliated with the U.S. Business and Industry Council, a 501(c)(6) non-profit business association.

The U.S. Business and Industry Council is a national organization of business owners and executives dedicated to making the U.S. domestic economy the world's leading engine of economic growth. The USBIC Educational Foundation is its research arm. Only a robust national economy, balanced in capabilities and dynamic in operation, can provide the material base for an American society that is stable at home and secure in the world.

The USBIC was founded in 1933 to represent the concerns of America's small and medium-sized business community. Member companies are typically family-owned or privately held, mostly in the manufacturing sector. They are often the major employers in their home communities and the mainstays of the local economy. This membership composition has given the USBIC an outlook on issues more rooted in mainstream America than other national business groups, which are dominated by giant multinational corporations with global agendas and dwindling national loyalties.

Because it does not represent only a single industry, but has approximately 1,000 member companies in 44 states, USBIC has always based its policy positions on a national interest standard -- i.e., the positions that it takes must be good for the country as a whole, both now and in terms of its future strength, rather than reflecting the narrow interests of a particular company or industry. USBIC favors lower taxes, since high hamper economic growth. Government levies on families, estates, and capital gains are particularly burdensome. It also opposes regulations that retard productive activities, especially in the development of new domestic energy sources that are needed to power a strong national economy.

Unlike many other business groups, USBIC is concerned about the impact of "globalization" on American society and independence. The huge and growing trade deficits undermine the country's industrial base -- including its defense industries, reduce personal incomes for most Americans, and threaten the financial system as indebtness to foreign corporations and governments mounts. The result is that the United States grows weaker as its vulnerabilities to overseas events increase.

The so-called philosophy of "globalization" with its emphasis on transnational organizations like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, an International Criminal Court, and a web of suffocating agreements like the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty threaten U.S. sovereignty,which is the only firm guarantee of American liberty, values, and standard of living. As has been true since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution a quarter millennium ago, a strong economy and a strong defense go together, safeguarding the country and its people. USBIC is dedicated to keeping this connection in the forefront of American policy-making. If the United States is to maintain its pre-eminent position in the world, while continuing to prosper and advance traditional American values, it must adopt economic policies that focus on improving the productivity, capabilities, knowledge, and the wealth of the people who reside in this country

The United States must also act to advance its interests overseas; to maintain its access to resources and markets; to protect trade routes and allies; and to guard against aggression and adverse changes in the international balance of power. Building a strong national economy does not isolate America from the world, but on the contrary assures that America has the means to shape internatoinal events to its own advantage and deal with them on its own terms.

The USBIC Educational Foundation was founded in 1967 to be the research arm of USBIC and to educate both policy makers and the American public on issues of concern to USBIC member companies. To carry out this task in the area of international trade and 'globalization,' USBIC Educational Foundation started this web site in March 2001.

Links page

21 posted on 01/01/2004 10:26:38 AM PST by Willie Green (Write-in William R. Hawkins for President in 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
"BUT... with it being New Year's and such... I hereby resolve to make a ping list!"

Happy New Year Willie. If you do carry through with your resolution could you please add me to the list?

22 posted on 01/01/2004 10:31:17 AM PST by Klickitat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The industrial infrastructure itself is collapsing.

Yep, it is seen by everyone.

Damn those blacksmiths and buggy wheel manufacturers for they were part of creating this "demise" we are in.

Willie, I have no doubt that if you were living in the time of their demise, you would be an icon in saving their jobs.

23 posted on 01/01/2004 10:33:01 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Klickitat
Yep. Anybody that wants on is welcome.
24 posted on 01/01/2004 10:35:59 AM PST by Willie Green (But I reserve the right to reject the flying monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
and the exchanges of US technology have been stifled to China's demise if not to others.

Bush's Brother Has Contract to Help Chinese Chip Maker
A Bush In Hand Is Worth...A Lot - Neil Bush working for a chipmaker with powerful ties to Beijing

25 posted on 01/01/2004 10:44:19 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Nobody wants to manufacture anything here in the states because they cant afford it! The Trade Unions have caused the price of labor to go so high its no longer feasible or cost effective to produce goods here.
26 posted on 01/01/2004 10:45:55 AM PST by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Damn those blacksmiths and buggy wheel manufacturers for they were part

The "buggy whip analogy" is not applicable and merely displays superficial and uninformed ignorance.
Buggwhips were rendered obsolete in the marketplace by introduction of new products.
This is not true for the products that are currently being shed from American manufacturing, many of which are also in the high-tech manufacturing sector.

27 posted on 01/01/2004 10:51:37 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
A definite concern for technological espionage isn't it?

Toys from China have "chip's" in them. Fear not Willie, for we are the aggressor on terrorism now, and still are proponents of personal freedoms for everyone.

28 posted on 01/01/2004 10:53:51 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KingNo155
The Trade Unions have caused the price of labor to go so high its no longer feasible or cost effective to produce goods here.

Another false assumption.

Nationwide, only 15% of the manufacturing workforce is represented by organized labor.
In comparison, over 40% of government workers are unionized.
(Union affiliation of employed wage and salary workers by occupation and industry)

If anything, it is the federal regulatory bureacracy that places competitive utilization of our own domestic resources at an economic disadvantage when compared to nations with lax restrictions.

29 posted on 01/01/2004 10:58:41 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The "buggy whip analogy" is not applicable and merely displays superficial and uninformed ignorance.

Forgive me on my history knowledge Willie.

I don't have a vision that shows a difference in regard to this post and what has happened in the past, giving our current financial status with the rest of the world.

Enlighten me as to why we are all at peril NOW and won't overcome it as we have in the past.

30 posted on 01/01/2004 11:02:53 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
From the article: 1. The president must declare that the United States faces a manufacturing, R&D, and outsourcing emergency...

Pure Symbolism. Acomplishes NOTHING.

-----
From the article: 2. The president should create an Apollo Program-type task force...

Oh, Oh-h-h...the infamous TASK FORCE. Still accomplishes nothing.

-----
From the article: 3. Federal R&D spending should be tripled...

Oh Boy...just what we need more Federal Spending. Then they'll beat up on the President for higher deficits.

-----
From the article: imposing a ?variable trade equalization tariff? on imports...offer a partial exemption for the world´s poorest countries...

There it is...I knew it had to come to raising taxes with exemptions to complicate the tax code.

-----
From the article: 5. Companies manufacturing or assembling in the United States should be barred from treating service work performed overseas as a deductible business expense. ...

There shouldn't be any such thing as a "deductible business expense" anyway. The tax rate should be lowered to a flat rate and all deductions should be eliminated. Simplification and lowering is the key.

-----
From the article: The United States government clearly has lost the ability to negotiate trade agreements that enrich the great majority of Americans and strengthen the domestic manufacturing base on net....

They meant to add..."now that Clintoon is gone from office. This bafoon (Bush) can't do anything right." They didn't say it, but I'd put money on it that they thought it. I had a conversation last night with one who thought the same thing.

-----
From the article: U.S. leaders should not engage in trade negotiations until this ability is regained...

They mean until a DemocRAT is in the White House again. Then and only then can we be free.

-----
From the article: ...the president and Congress should appoint a National Trade Strategy Commission...

Not another dog-gone Commission!!!

-----
From the article: ...replacing the current FSC tax incentive with a major tax break for any company, either American or foreign-owned, that performs genuine manufacturing activity in the United States...

Define genuine. I can see fake "genuine" manufacturing plants cropping up all over the place after this one.

-----
Sorry I'm out of patience with this gobledygook. I can't take anymore. The rest of it is simply raising taxes, forbiding this and forbiding that. They even suggest that Congress forbid the lobbying by foreigners. Like that's going to happen. Congressmen are addicted to being wined and dined. Forget that one.

JUST REDUCE THE TAXES AND THE REGULATIONS AND ALL THIS WILL TAKE CARE OF ITSELF!!!!
31 posted on 01/01/2004 11:03:19 AM PST by gooleyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

This article is mostly bull feces.

First, American labor is overpowered.

Yes, I said American labor is overpowered in our economy. We overprotect our workers with laws that protect the laziest and the most careless.

Tax policy has driven corporations from Northeast states into Southeast and Midwest states.

Other tax laws allow/encurage corporations to move offshore.

Comliance with regulations without purpose keep productivity down.

Our legal system is the single-most detrimental factor in moving jobs and industries overseas. Companies do not want to manufacture in a climate of fear where laws do not apply or protect industry since legislation can be made from the judicial bench.

Even if we did everything the above article suggests, the differential in labor wages would still act as an incentive to move manufacturing overseas.

The answer is simply a continuing increase in productivity.

Automation is far more reliable, offers higher quality and lower costs than the lowest wage nations overseas.

More automated industries allow employees to seek employment in higher-skilled areas such as engineering, maintenance, etc.

Frankly, if your job is to pick up a nut and put it onto a bolt, you are a drag on our economy.

By pushing for higher technology in industry, we will reduce worksite injuries, worker's compensations insurance rates, and allow for a workforce that can seek higher meaning in their lives than menial labor tasks.

32 posted on 01/01/2004 11:05:41 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Interesting "facts" you present.

My "facts" from the Bureau of Economic Analysis/DOL are a bit different:

Starting in the year 1987, manufacturing as a % of GDP was 18.7%, 19.2% ('88), 18.5% ('89), 17.9% ('90), then holding around 17.-17.5 through 1995. UNDER 17% '96-99, only 15.5% 2000, and 14.1% 2001.

Certainly other sectors of GDP grew during that period. But manufacturing's DOLLAR INCOME, while growing every year from 1987-2000, finally took a dive, and a big one, in 2001, losing 6.6%--around $100billion.

That's the bad news. We don't yet have 2002 numbers from BEA--they are expected in late March.
33 posted on 01/01/2004 11:07:01 AM PST by ninenot (So many cats, so few recipes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Huber
How does the rate of manufacturing job loss in the US compare with the rates of manufacturing job losses overseas?

Thanks for your intelligent and well-meaning inquiry.

According to the CIA's "Factbook," manufacturing as a percentage of GDP is dramatically higher than the USA's in a number of countries.

Ireland 48%, Austria 33%, Germany, Japan, Spain 31%, Sweden 29%, Australia, Canada, France 26%, India 25%, Belgium 24%, USA 18%, HongKong 13.5%.

Must be that all those other countries are composed largely of stupid, fat, lazy, buggywhip makers, eh?

Now it's our turn: why do you suppose that those other countries make it a national policy to maintain those numbers, and that China is doing anything possible to attain those numbers?

Hmmmmmmm????

34 posted on 01/01/2004 11:13:55 AM PST by ninenot (So many cats, so few recipes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KingNo155
The Trade Unions have caused the price of labor to go so high its no longer feasible or cost effective to produce goods here.

Free enterprise to Willie is something that he feels, apparently, that should be laid to rest in behest of manufacturing jobs. However without free enterprise, those high paying manufacturing jobs would have never existed in the first place.

35 posted on 01/01/2004 11:15:54 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KingNo155
Nobody wants to manufacture anything here in the states because they cant afford it!

But everyone wants to sell everything in the States. It is not possible to sustain a huge trade deficit for long. Americans with low wages and declining dollar will not be able to afford foreign made goods.

36 posted on 01/01/2004 11:17:47 AM PST by A. Pole (pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
This article is mostly bull feces.

After 31 posts, we have a winner!

EL, your insight is greatly appreciated. : )

37 posted on 01/01/2004 11:20:13 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: gooleyman
From the article: imposing a ?variable trade equalization tariff? on imports...offer a partial exemption for the world´s poorest countries... There it is...I knew it had to come to raising taxes with exemptions to complicate the tax code.

What free traders propose is to punish domestic production by placing ALL taxes on it, while abolishing foreign import tax (tariffs).

38 posted on 01/01/2004 11:20:20 AM PST by A. Pole (pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
The stronger the tariff, the larger the trade deficit will be.

Huh??

The stronger the tariff, the SMALLER the trade deficit will be, assuming you are in America.

I'm a little concerned about the 'Gummint intervention' proposals, too. OTOH, there's only ONE entity charged with the responsibility of protecting the interests of the USA--and that's the Gummint.

I agree with you that it would be a pleasant change.

39 posted on 01/01/2004 11:21:03 AM PST by ninenot (So many cats, so few recipes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
...the decline of American manufacturing is fast nearing the point of irreversibility...

Sounds like one o' them there paradigm shift thingees.

40 posted on 01/01/2004 11:24:29 AM PST by Redcloak (°¿°)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-458 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson