Skip to comments.
British Airways Flight 216 Held at Dulles Airport Tonight
Local Channel 9
| Thursday, January 1, 2004
| Kristinn
Posted on 01/01/2004 8:10:24 PM PST by kristinn
WUSA-TV 9 in Washington, D.C. reported on their 11 p.m. news that yet another British Airways flight is being scrutinized by federal agents at Dulles Airport.
Flight 216, scheduled to depart hours ago, is being kept from takeoff while its passengers and luggage are rescreened.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Virginia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; ba; ba216; homelandsecurity; iad; orangealert4
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-83 next last
1
posted on
01/01/2004 8:10:26 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: kristinn
Here we go again.
2
posted on
01/01/2004 8:11:55 PM PST
by
bcoffey
To: kristinn
Wow . . . somebody is seriously concerned about something here . . . this is getting very intriguing . . .
3
posted on
01/01/2004 8:11:56 PM PST
by
LikeLight
( ___________________________________ it's a line)
To: Dog
Ping
4
posted on
01/01/2004 8:12:24 PM PST
by
mitchbert
(Facts are Stubborn Things)
To: kristinn
Sounds like they are taking this " chatter" very seriously!
5
posted on
01/01/2004 8:12:52 PM PST
by
MEG33
(We Got Him!)
To: kristinn
I wish they'd explain, atger is okay too, what's going on. Is there ANY news, at all, as to what happened re the other one ?
6
posted on
01/01/2004 8:13:28 PM PST
by
nopardons
To: kristinn
Looking for another drunk TSA official no doubt.
7
posted on
01/01/2004 8:13:39 PM PST
by
leadpenny
To: bcoffey
flightarrivals.com says the flight was supposed to have departed IAD at 6:36 pm EST but still not departed nearly FIVE hours later. Must be some security screen.
8
posted on
01/01/2004 8:15:05 PM PST
by
bcoffey
To: kristinn
Again? At least this one isn't another Flight 223. I think we've had two of those stopped in as many days.
9
posted on
01/01/2004 8:15:27 PM PST
by
Ex-Dem
(>>>--------------->)
To: bcoffey
According to the BA Website, Flight 216 was scheduled to depart at 6:36 p.m. EST from IAD destination Heathrow. Status listed as "not departed."
10
posted on
01/01/2004 8:16:21 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: bcoffey
Destination would be Heathrow (London) . . . if they ever let it go . . .
11
posted on
01/01/2004 8:16:28 PM PST
by
LikeLight
( ___________________________________ it's a line)
To: kristinn
I wish someone could tell us if they are give particular attention to certain passengers or if everyone is going thru the same routine.
Do they need to employee new screeners? Are these people not doing their jobs?
Is the news media asking these questions? There really should be an explaination as to why the inspections weren't done properly the first time. We have no control over what happens in other nations, so I have no problem with the extra screening which occurred last night. But this is goofy. If our baggage screeners were doing their jobs properly, a second screening shouldn't be necessary.
Makes me wonder if they are playing games with the departure schedule for some other reason.
To: kristinn
Kewel!
To: kristinn; Peach
This certainly gets more and more interesting with time...
14
posted on
01/01/2004 8:17:28 PM PST
by
nwctwx
To: leadpenny
I'm sure there's quite a few drunks at Dulles tonight.
15
posted on
01/01/2004 8:17:42 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: kristinn
Here's a side problem with these delays: The flight crews will start to bump up against crew-rest restrictions.
To: bcoffey; kristinn
Here's the
Dulles airport page. You can search by flight, airline, etc.
What interesting times we are living in.
17
posted on
01/01/2004 8:19:22 PM PST
by
tgslTakoma
(Get ready for March 20, 2004 folks. cANSWER commies are regrouping for another assault on DC!)
To: kristinn
Is the same plane that came in last night? If so, they might suspect some sort of transfer occuring on the planes themselves -- something that screening machines wouldn't pick up and regular cleaning might not find. Or maybe they've already found that something, and are trying to find the intended recipient...
To: kristinn
Time to spare - Go by air!
Guess Amtrak doesn't go to London, however.
To: tgslTakoma
What interesting times we are living in.True... but how much more interesting it would be if we had a clue as to what's going on with BA and IAD!
20
posted on
01/01/2004 8:21:27 PM PST
by
bcoffey
To: leadpenny
Yep. Good point.
21
posted on
01/01/2004 8:21:41 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: bcoffey
That's the good part. The bad guys are wondering too.
To: bcoffey
I might take up heavy drinking, if it gets much more interesting..
23
posted on
01/01/2004 8:26:53 PM PST
by
tgslTakoma
(Get ready for March 20, 2004 folks. cANSWER commies are regrouping for another assault on DC!)
To: browardchad
Is the same plane that came in last night? If so, they might suspect some sort of transfer occuring on the planes themselves -- something that screening machines wouldn't pick up and regular cleaning might not find.Good thought.
24
posted on
01/01/2004 8:27:43 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: kristinn
Wow...there is something definitely going on....this is very abnormal....it's like they know something, and they're thisclose to knowing exactly what they need to know....
25
posted on
01/01/2004 8:28:13 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: kristinn
Passenger David Litwick told WJLA-TV in Washington that he and his wife were not questioned, but at least one other passenger was. Litwick said four FBI agents spoke to a woman who appeared to be from the Middle East, repeatedly asking her why she was not traveling with her husband.
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=25&sid=156735
26
posted on
01/01/2004 8:28:24 PM PST
by
lchoro
To: kristinn
No one is telling Matt Drudge anything either. If they are, he ain't telling us.
To: kristinn
Here we go again BUMP.
To: leadpenny
Drudge is sleeping it off.
29
posted on
01/01/2004 8:30:04 PM PST
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
("That is the widsom of the past, for all wisdom is not new wisdom")
To: kristinn
WTOP News update - 11:30 pm EST
Cancellations/delays due to terrorist concerns
BA 216 held because of a non-specific threat
That's all they said.
30
posted on
01/01/2004 8:32:27 PM PST
by
bcoffey
To: All
WUSA reports the flight has finally taken off.
31
posted on
01/01/2004 8:32:31 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: big ern
:)
To: nicmarlo
Or another possibility is the other side is smoking out their rats and their comm's weaknesses. Doubtful but possible.
33
posted on
01/01/2004 8:33:16 PM PST
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
("That is the widsom of the past, for all wisdom is not new wisdom")
To: kristinn
I think I'd be drinking heavily if I was on that flight. Now some of you may be wondering if I have a drinking problem... I'm not a drinker. But all this stuff lately is making me rethink that "lifestyle choice."
34
posted on
01/01/2004 8:36:36 PM PST
by
tgslTakoma
(Get ready for March 20, 2004 folks. cANSWER commies are regrouping for another assault on DC!)
To: no one in particular
Say! Has anyone seen Caddy Shack???
To: kristinn
Information updated 1 minute ago.
BA0216 IAD LHR 01JAN
Scheduled Departure time: 18:35 01JAN
Actual: 22:07
36
posted on
01/01/2004 8:37:07 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: null and void
Heh. Not on your tintype.
To: kristinn
Reckon we need to follow it across the ocean with "Flighttracker" to make sure it gets to Heathrow?
And does Flighttracker track where it IS, or where it's SUPPOSED to be?
38
posted on
01/01/2004 8:38:11 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: Johnny_Cipher
LOL!
To: big ern
Really, the possibilities are endless.....but, IMHO, "we" know something definite is up.....but may lack the perfect specifics....perhaps known is 95.9% ?
40
posted on
01/01/2004 8:39:01 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: kristinn
Wow! Another one.
Our daughter, s-i-l and grandson flew into San Francisco this afternoon aboard a BA flight.
She figured that it would be a safe flight given the fact that the route took them over Canada. What's Canada got worth attacking? :)
Then, San Francisco is safe from terrorists cuz it can't get screwed up any worse than what the libs and gays have already created.
To: All
42
posted on
01/01/2004 8:41:19 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: Amelia
You guys can stay up all night for that. I'm going to try to go to bed soon.
43
posted on
01/01/2004 8:43:58 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: kristinn
I'm going to try to go to bed soon.Me too -- I wonder if we'll be doing this again tomorrow night.
44
posted on
01/01/2004 8:44:26 PM PST
by
bcoffey
To: Amelia
Good link, Amelia. I don't know what to make of these events, do you? I am thankful our people are being so cautious, careful and vigilant.
45
posted on
01/01/2004 8:46:55 PM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: kristinn
This is good. They are doing their best to prevent terrorist attacks.
To: kristinn
I'm going to try to go to bed soon.Me too, but you know this place is like a bar that never closes!
47
posted on
01/01/2004 8:48:50 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: onyx
I don't know what to make of these events, do you? I am thankful our people are being so cautious, careful and vigilant. I don't know what to make of it either....I just hope that people don't start regarding it as "much ado about nothing"....
48
posted on
01/01/2004 8:49:47 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: nicmarlo
Any updates?
flightarrivals.com still shows the flight as "not departed." That could mean it left the gate at 11:02 pm as you reported but hasn't yet taken off.
Or it could mean that the web site didn't update their info.
49
posted on
01/01/2004 8:49:51 PM PST
by
bcoffey
To: kristinn
Man Restrained After Approaching Cockpit
From Drudge ~~~ In an incident over the Pacific on Thursday night, a passenger on a Northwest Airlines flight from Detroit to Honolulu had to be restrained after he approached the cockpit, airline officials said. The man was escorted to the back of the plane by two off-duty pilots who happened to be on board and was arrested when the plane landed. Thomas Becher, a spokesman for Northwest, said he could not say whether the incident was related to terrorism... Developing...
50
posted on
01/01/2004 8:50:09 PM PST
by
kayak
(Have you prayed for our President and our troops today?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson