[eno_]

What our second favorite air crash shill (now that we no longer have the illustrious Elmer Barr to kick around) isn't telling you is that airplanes come apart due to "unusual attitude."

Both the engines, and the tail came off. They came off for the same reason: the plane was out of control and sideways. They are the largest surfaces that, if you orient them the wrong way, will break off.

AA587 was out of control before the tail and engines got ripped off due going 300kts sideways. The qustions is: Why was it out of control? Witnesses saw fire and/or explosions on board. The shoe bomber was caught shortly afterward. So which is more likely: a successful shoe bomber or baggage bomb, or an unexplained mystery failure?

[_Jim]

The qustions is: Why was it out of control?

That question has been answered for those with the ability to do a liitle of their own non-conspiratorial based reseach with the amount of material about this event on the web nowadays - your overlooking some of the more substantative excerpts I've posted above certainly gives me a clue where you're coming from, too; convincing folks such as yourself is an possible task, I'm convinced. All I can do is present the substantial, factual evidence by the competant folks and leave the reading to the readers ...

If you wish continually paint every catastrophic event that has occurred with a conspiratorial paint-brush - have at it. Just remember that technology's operation isn't based on black magic, every physical system has limits and sooner or later a failure can be expected to occur - usually though a combination of adverse circumstances ...