Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eaker
Yep. That formula seems to make more sense as people age, but it's terribly inaccurate for young folks. Example: a 25 year old earning 60K would need a net worth of $150K. Assuming this person graduated college at 22 with a net worth of $0, and earned $60K for three years, a net worth of $150K is simply impossible when taxes are considered.
95 posted on 01/04/2004 4:42:01 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
ha. had the same thought...
100 posted on 01/04/2004 4:50:54 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: NittanyLion
This formula would still only work if they had saved 22k+ per year for 18 years and never had children or illness.

One cannot save 22k per year just by driving used cars and not having cable.

105 posted on 01/04/2004 4:53:27 PM PST by Eaker (Place your clothes and weapons where you can find them in the dark. - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson