Posted on 01/05/2004 7:44:29 PM PST by Brian_Baldwin
Is Bushs Sombrero Made in China?
Bush said at a news conference in January that he was "firmly against blanket amnesty," or a mass legalization, that what he wants to do is help match any willing employer with any willing employee" whether citizen or illegal alien, so they can have legitimacy and legalize their presence (make them LEGAL aliens, not ILLEGAL aliens, per Tom Ridge, who is in charge of our homeland security and protecting our borders and stuff). In other words, if you are a terrorist and an illegal alien wanna be, and a willing employer on the US side of the border (the DNC for example?) wants to hire a willing employee, then Bush is going to help team them up, and then you can be a legal alien. And the word legal alien is so close to illegal alien, the check-pants Bushies figure folks will get mixed up and confused with the terms, or not even notice the difference.
So, Bush isnt going to give us mass legalization, just legalization . . . In other words, this isnt going to be Democratic Party mass legalization, its just going to be Republican Party multitude legalization. Mass is for Massachusetts, multitude is for the lower 48. And, it isnt going to be blanket amnesty, its going to be poncho amnesty.
The idea is to get the Hispanic vote, politics not borders, and homeland security is soon to be just another word for political correctness. I understand that maybe poncho amnesty also means giving the illegal aliens a.k.a. legal aliens, Social Security benefits, just in time for it to go bankrupt after Bush leaves office. Its poncho amnesty, because it means Hispanic, in juxtaposition to Arab, Jamaican, etc.. So, what Bush has to figure out is, how to make it Mexicans only need apply for the blue card, because they are the only constituency in sheer numbers to maybe make a difference in California and Texas in 2004 in comparison to, oh, lets say Pakistanis for example.
But you know, in the end, you go down that road, you know the cowards in the Republican Party will end up acquiescing it to everyone, and anyone.
So, I guess on Wednesday we will be told something from Bush about a guest workers program, which will legalize their presence, and that it isnt mass legalization, its just legalization, it isnt amnesty, it just a form of amnesty. Get it?
So, we can all clap, hurray, Bush will win California. Right?
And all those Mexicans, and La Raza, and all, they are all now NOT going to vote for the Democrats, thanks to the pure genius of Karl Rove.
Am I going to vote for Bush, in 2004?
Tell me Brian, are you going to vote for Bush, or let Dean take the White House, you ask?
Well, I am not going to say, because I dont know yet. I can tell you one thing, if Bush does what I think hes going to do, no, I will not vote for Bush in 2004.
I am watching two things.
Taiwan. Bush is getting ready to sell out Free, Democratic China, to sell out democracy, the Republic of China, Taiwan, to communism. Hes telling, warning, Taiwan, they better not have a referendum. I suppose, if he had his way, he would of made sure California didnt have their referendum, or a recall, or something shockingly like democracy, too?
So, we are fighting in Iraq, to bring democracy and liberation to them, so that maybe they can have referendums or something.
Just, Taiwan better not even think about doing the same. Or else.
Borders. Terrorism. Borders. 911, because we werent minding our borders, immigration, deportations werent enforced, asleep at the INS wheel, terrorism. Borders and terrorist threat go hand in hand. You cant have homeland security and poncho amnesty you cant have both. You have to decide.
YOU have to decide. I am going to decide later this week, when I watch what Bush is about to do.
YOU also have to decide. Borders and terrorism. Do you care?
Maybe this Wednesday, we will know if Bush cares.
And, its like Savage says where is the debate? Who said Bush has the right to make such a dramatic, sweeping (and PERSONAL agreement between him and V.F. of Mexico), without asking us? Without a debate? Without the democratic process?
So, this isnt worthy of a debate? We dont even have a say in the matter?
Is this Imperial Rome?
Is Bushs sombrero Made in China?
You think, its going to be so easy for Bush in 2004. Or maybe you think that, maybe not. In fact, if Bush DOESNT do this poncho amnesty, I predict it will be easy for him in 2004.
And I predict, if he DOES do this poncho amnesty thing, it isnt going to win him the Hispanic vote. It will be the political bomb that can, and will, really blow up his whole conservative gig et all. It wont win him votes. It will lose many more than he would gain. And Karl Rove isnt a genius. In fact, he a danger to our Republic. To our borders. To our national security.
But, I guess, these things, these kind of poncho amnesty things, it isnt for us, it isnt for the American people to decide. Communist China takes Free China. Mexico takes California. Heck, who are we to argue? With Bush?
La Cuca RA-cha! La Cuca RAAA-Cha! La Kook-a RAAA-Kah-Feller-Republican!
La Cuca RAAA-Cha! La Cuca RAAAAA-Cha!
La Kook-a Rockefeller Republican!
But what will they call the 2007 or 2008 amnesty for those who miss the cutoff for the 2004 giveaway ?
Rank | Location | Receipts | Donors/Avg | Freepers/Avg | Monthlies | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
1 |
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
From the looks of it, you're against it, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.