Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/06/2004 12:25:22 PM PST by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: putupon
He must be a Bush-hater.
2 posted on 01/06/2004 12:26:28 PM PST by FirstPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
I'm sure Hannity's a real expert on the subject.
3 posted on 01/06/2004 12:26:40 PM PST by Huck (This space available--monthly rates---great exposure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *immigrant_list; A Navy Vet; Lion Den Dan; Free the USA; Libertarianize the GOP; madfly; B4Ranch; ..
ping
4 posted on 01/06/2004 12:26:44 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
49 Panama 25.00
1
25.00
5
5.00


Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

6 posted on 01/06/2004 12:28:12 PM PST by Support Free Republic (I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
Sean is right...Well done...He said the they are rewarding lawlessness.
7 posted on 01/06/2004 12:29:58 PM PST by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
I see the warning at the top of this thread, and I understand that this is a hot topic here, albeit one in which I've not had occasion to participate.

That said, I question the value of posting 'he said/he said' threads on this topic.

There's a Limbaugh thread, posted a little earlier, that begs the same question.

Does this further the debate?

it amounts to forum pollution, IMHO.
9 posted on 01/06/2004 12:32:53 PM PST by IncPen ( Remember: Make your comments worthy of a repost at DU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
Why would a terrorist need to get on a plane to come into this country? Why not goto South America or Canada and just cross the border like so many illegals already have.
10 posted on 01/06/2004 12:34:41 PM PST by sickofthehandouts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
Does Sean's use of the word "asinine" constitute flame-speech?

At the very least, his comment is not part of any constructive discussion of the issue.

The existence of millions of illegal aliens who work for very little money and are part of our economy is a cold hard fact. It's all very well to bleat about "getting control of our borders" or "enforcing the law", but it is unrealistic to believe that we are just going to eject every illegal alien -- even if we could.

They are here is such large numbers because:

- They want to earn dollars
- There are jobs for them (mostly low-pay) that others can't or won't fill
- American like eating strawberries and enjoying other fruits (pun intended) of the illegal immigrant labor pool.

In other words, we want them here. We've voted with the almighty buck.

Since they are going to be here anyway, reform of the immigration laws to regulate guest workers and improve security is a perfectly valid solution. I would say that it's asinine to assume that enforcing the current laws (which are not enforceable anyway) is the ONLY solution.

21 posted on 01/06/2004 12:59:48 PM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
Hannity is correct. Every night an army of illegals, including criminals and possible Islamofascists cross our Mexican borders.

Immigration has always been the lifeblood of America but the laws governing it should be enforced. Illegal invaders should be apprehended and deported. Illegal alien "runners" should be incarcerate for life. Companies which hire ilegals should be put out of business - permanently.

The only immigrants allowed in America should be those who follow our laws and comply with our entry requirements.

Karl Rove is the Republican face of James Carville and Tom Ridge is a meathead.
34 posted on 01/06/2004 1:25:10 PM PST by ZULU (Remember the Alamo!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
When something's really asinine, you'd be remiss to refrain from calling it that.
66 posted on 01/06/2004 2:47:37 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping! (Hannity)

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

67 posted on 01/06/2004 3:22:24 PM PST by nutmeg (Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
I don't understand exactly what, specifically, he said was asinine.
72 posted on 01/06/2004 5:09:19 PM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
Sean Hannity just used the word "asinine" in regards to any immigration change until we gain control of the current immigration situation.

Can he do that?

79 posted on 01/06/2004 6:43:52 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: putupon
Asinine, insane--call it what you will, but in the long run it just isn't right to grant these people amnesty when they care not a whit about this countrys laws.
89 posted on 01/06/2004 8:44:05 PM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson