Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Ridiculous Speech About Immigration Reform
RightWingNews ^

Posted on 01/08/2004 1:10:01 PM PST by Happy2BMe

Bush's Ridiculous Speech About Immigration Reform

I just want to comment on a few of the things that jumped out at me as I read the text of Bush's speech about the horrendous new immigration legislation he is going to propose.

To begin with, this line just chaps me...

"As a nation that values immigration and depends on immigration, we should have immigration laws that work and make us proud. Yet today we do not."

No, our immigration laws don't work or make us proud. You know why? Because we don't make an effort to enforce them. It's like telling your kid to clean his room, having him watch TV instead, and then having him look you in the eye and say, "you know the system we're using to get my room cleaned up just isn't working".

Here's more from Bush...

"Many undocumented workers have walked mile after mile, through the heat of the day and the cold of the night. Some have risked their lives in dangerous desert border crossings or entrusted their lives to the brutal rings of heartless human smugglers.

BUSH: Workers who seek only to earn a living end up in the shadows of American life, fearful, often abused and exploited.

When they're victimized by crimes they're afraid to call the police or seek recourse in the legal system. They are cut off from their families far away, fearing if they leave our country to visit relatives back home they might never be able to return to their jobs."

Yes, that's pretty much what happens to criminals everywhere isn't it? I mean even though a drug dealer works hard and does dangerous work, he can't very well call the police and tell them someone stole his crack can he? Of course, if he were in an honest profession or if the illegal aliens obeyed our laws, they wouldn't have this problem would they?

Then Bush tosses off this whopper about the border...

"First, America must control its borders. Following the attacks of September the 11th, 2001, this duty of the federal government has become even more urgent, and we're fulfilling that duty."

No, the government isn't "fulfilling that duty". We still have illegals, drug dealers, and probably terrorists pouring across our border because the Bush administration even after 9/11, will not commit the necessary resources and manpower to get the job done.

Then this paragraph begs an obvious question...

"Employers must not hire undocumented aliens or temporary workers whose legal status has expired. They must report to the government the temporary workers they hire and who leave their employ so that we can keep track of people in the program and better enforce our immigration laws. There must be strong workplace enforcement with tough penalties for anyone -- for any employer violating these laws."

...and that question is, "why can't we go ahead and do that NOW"? If we did this today, most of the people who are here illegally would go home because they couldn't find jobs. So why do we have to wait until after we've made all these illegals who don't respect our laws into citizens to do this?

Then there's this...

"The citizenship line, however, is too long, and our current limits on legal immigration are too low.

My administration will work with the Congress to increase the annual number of green cards that can lead to citizenship."

Our population is growing as it is and isn't unemployment higher than we'd like as it is? So why do we want to INCREASE the number of people flooding into our country legally?

Last but not least, Bush hit this theme several times...

"Reform must begin by confronting a basic fact of life and economics: Some of the jobs being generated in America's growing economy are jobs American citizens are not filling."

As Mark Krikorian explained in yesterday's National Review, those jobs would be filled by Americans if the illegals weren't driving down wages.

Does that not make perfect sense? I mean people get all up in arms about companies going overseas to get cheap labor, but when the cheap labor COMES HERE, those same people just assume that Americans "won't do those jobs". Sure they will, just not at the same price.

I can only hope that Congress fights Bush all the way on this bill and stops it cold. Giving illegal aliens legal status is only going to cause even more of them to flood across our borders to fill up our prisons, our schools, and leech off of our social services. Our government should be doing everything in its power to stop them instead of rewarding them for breaking our laws.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: aliens; foreignoccupation; illegalmexicans; immigrationreform; invasion; nationalinsecurity; nationalsuicide; plunder; plunderamericans; plunderusa; thenannystate; thewelfarestate; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-214 next last
To: kevao
Of course not....He ONLY carps...I was asking what he liked about W and who he voted for. Notice he didn't answer Either of those simple questions.
121 posted on 01/08/2004 4:21:46 PM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
I'll bet you that Bush wins in a landslide...EVEN Calif and New York!!
122 posted on 01/08/2004 4:26:09 PM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
> >>What does this mean? Is this another outcry at the horror of allowing a human born in the US to be a citizen, as opposed to undoing that law and managing the population on the basis of genetics?<<

What in the hell are you talking about? Genetics? Name one place where "race" as opposed to "nationality" has been addressed. Take your racist accusations somewhere else. > Genetics. As in who your parents are. Rather than respect the reality of birth on US territory, extremists are advocating limiting citizenship only to offspring of citizens. That, my friend, is genetics.

123 posted on 01/08/2004 4:28:17 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
"I was disappointed that Bush did not unveil a plan to use technology to monitor the borders though."

This plan is already "underconstruction" as part of the SMART BORDERS INITIATIVE (included in the 2003 Homeland Security budget):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020125.html

Additionally, the biometric technology recently implemented at our airports will be implemented at our borders by the end of this year.





124 posted on 01/08/2004 4:40:23 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Thank you for your respctive on Ronald Reagan.

He made mistakes and he admitted them.

If there is one word I can use to describe Ronald Reagan, it is RELIABLE.

You always knew where he stood, always knew what he stood for, always knew what he stood against, and you always knew he stood up for right, even when it was not popular.

Regarding President Bush's standings on abortion, gay rights, immigration reform, and protecting American jobs, I regretfully cannot compare his integrity with that of Ronald Reagan.

Dubya is looking more RINO with each passing compromise.

And it remains to be seen just how huge a compromise he succumbed to yesterday over immigration "reform."

I'm not impressed.

125 posted on 01/08/2004 4:52:25 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Owen
>> Rather than respect the reality of birth on US territory, extremists are advocating limiting citizenship only to offspring of citizens. <<

If that is your definition of extremist, count me in. Comprende?
126 posted on 01/08/2004 4:52:32 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Pardon - meant to say, "Thank you for your perspective"
127 posted on 01/08/2004 4:56:26 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
"Regarding President Bush's standings on abortion, gay rights, immigration reform, and protecting American jobs, I regretfully cannot compare his integrity with that of Ronald Reagan."


Forgive me, for I do not understand. President Reagan SAID the RIGHT thing relative to each of these areas and then DID the LEFT thing, yet it's President Bush who has the integrity problem?! I actually listened to Bush when he was governor of Texas and when he was campaigning for the presidency, he has remained "reliably" consistent in his views -- stated AND behaved!

You may disagree with President Bush's policies, but you have NO REASON to question his integrity!
128 posted on 01/08/2004 5:59:10 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
What "left things" did President Reagan do?
129 posted on 01/08/2004 6:02:49 PM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Thank you for your opinion.

I reserve the right to question the integrity of any polititian, regardless of party affiliation or platform, motto or creed if it appears that such person is acting in self-gain or not acting in the best interest of this country.

I reamin unimpressed by Dubya's weak attempt to put a bandaid on a cancer patient, tell him to take two aspirins prior to going to bed, and send him home telling him to come back next month (only if he is not feeling any better).

As I said, compromise is not becoming a great leader - regardless of WHO that leader is.

130 posted on 01/08/2004 6:23:36 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Wow...awesome.
131 posted on 01/08/2004 6:47:53 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
So how familiar are you with the H-2A guest worker program???

I'm a farm bud, who do you think cut's my tobacco?

132 posted on 01/08/2004 6:48:06 PM PST by org.whodat (Someone turn Bush over he's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
"What "left things" did President Reagan do?"


Please refer to my post at #115!

[If you're a history buff like me, you may already know that President Reagan was attacked incessantly by his right flank, beginning with his tenure as governor of California and continuing thru his Presidency -- Anne Coulter even makes reference to this fact in her most recent book! STRONG LEADERS EVOKE STRONG REACTIONS -- and yes, I'm refering to both President Reagan and President Bush!]
133 posted on 01/08/2004 6:53:11 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
I wasn't questioning your "rights"; I was questioning your hypocrisy!
134 posted on 01/08/2004 6:54:07 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
I am not ALONE
135 posted on 01/08/2004 6:59:39 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
So are you saying that you've employed the H-2A guest worker program. So how much do you end up paying your workers then and how are their accomadations??? Hmmmmm....

136 posted on 01/08/2004 7:05:01 PM PST by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Again, I'm not addressing your position on immigration; I'm addressing your hypocritical assessment of President Bush relative to President Reagan!
137 posted on 01/08/2004 7:06:47 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
The US has a totally disfunctional INS... not a word about fixing that... What I see is Bush sweeping up the dirt and putting under the homeland security RUG.. and a wipeing of the hands together with the words "and thats that!"...

The only thing missing is a Curley(Howard) salute and a Curly shuffle out of the oval office... and I'M NOT LAUGHING!... WHO elected this guy ?...

(( ME ! )).. leaving out the back door, embarrased

138 posted on 01/08/2004 7:08:31 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
If that is your definition of extremist, count me in.

I'll join you.

139 posted on 01/08/2004 7:12:43 PM PST by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
"What I see is Bush sweeping up the dirt and putting under the homeland security RUG.. and a wipeing of the hands together with the words "and thats that!"...

Did you catch the televised briefing the President gave of his new immigration reform?

I did.

I sensed a great sense of urgency - even a sense of anxiety I've rarely detected in Bush and among his staff.

As he introduced his staff, starting from Secratary of State Colin Powell down to his Homeland Seucrity Secratary, Tom Ridge, I noticed the expressions on the faces of each of these men as they were introduced.

Expressions say many things.

I kept watching the face of one of the president's staff as they were being introduced, in succession of order of precedence according to their jobs.

I have met and conversed with the Secratary of ATF personally, so I focused in on the expression of his face as the names were being called.

It was an expression of remaining calm and almost had the look of not "wanting" to be introduced at this particular briefing.

It was a big deal and all the heavy hitters were there.

The "jitters" were flying and my impression is a "bomb" has exploded right in the middle of the administration and Dubya is doing damage control.

140 posted on 01/08/2004 7:16:48 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson