I dunno bout ya'll but I am noticing the media lashing out more and more on Dean and sucking up to the Clark bar in the last week....hmmmm...have they gotten the message about their supposed poster boy Dizzy Dean?
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
22 |
Missouri |
291.00
|
10
|
29.10
|
331
|
0.88
|
198.00
|
14
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
2 posted on
01/08/2004 9:09:25 PM PST by
Support Free Republic
(I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
To: My Favorite Headache
have they gotten the message about their supposed poster boy Dizzy Dean?That is bad for GOP. Howard Dean is the dream candidate for Bush.
To: My Favorite Headache
...have they gotten the message about their supposed poster boy Dizzy Dean?No doubt - and they will go all out IMHO. Should be interesting to see if the media trumps the 'cult'...
4 posted on
01/08/2004 9:12:53 PM PST by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
To: My Favorite Headache
The ONLY hope we have of keeping the White Houss is if this idiot makes it to become the Dem nominee.
7 posted on
01/08/2004 9:36:12 PM PST by
Kay Soze
(How will refocusing INS resources from the war on terror to millions of Mexicans make US safer?)
To: My Favorite Headache
We are witnessing the shredding of the so-called Democratic Party. Political parties have come and gone, and even the "Democrats" have had a number of incarnations.
The 2004 dream ticket for the Demagogic Party is Dean-Clark, but I'm not too sure Clark will want that, and as he is the Clinton Gang's choice, Dean probably wouldn't want him either (it would be like a reprise of Stevenson-Kefauver). They'll probably wind up with Dean-Edwards, or Dean-Moseley-Braun.
8 posted on
01/08/2004 9:54:16 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(The best part of course, is that we get to watch!)
To: ValerieUSA
J'see this? Gosh, the media is after Dean, and pushing for Clark, a candidate that the partisan media shills and their Golden Child Bill Clinton think can beat GWB.
9 posted on
01/08/2004 10:26:11 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Hard to believe that the 1968 election was only four years after the 1964 election.)
To: My Favorite Headache
NO, NO, NO!!! The Media is supposed to keep sucking up the Dean Koolaid. They are NOT supposed to be bashing him. BOOO! Bad media!
Hopefully the Deaniacks will come out and shore up the Rats, making up for this type of goof.
10 posted on
01/08/2004 10:28:57 PM PST by
kingu
To: My Favorite Headache
No, they're afraid he might win now and then lose big in the main event.
They want someone who can win in the main event.
13 posted on
01/08/2004 11:32:18 PM PST by
DB
(©)
To: My Favorite Headache
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! They can't take away my dream candidate! I'm already making plans and reservations for my Schadenfreud Party on November 2-3, 2004! And I will NOT let them take this away from me!
16 posted on
01/09/2004 12:30:45 PM PST by
NYC GOP Chick
(Kaddafi is such a whack job that he never promoted himself past Colonel!)
To: My Favorite Headache
"If you look at the caucuses system, they are dominated by the special interests, in both sides, in both parties," Dean said on a Canadian television show in 2000. Elections shouldn't be decided by interests???
To: My Favorite Headache
I dunno bout ya'll but I am noticing the media lashing out more and more on Dean and sucking up to the Clark bar in the last week....hmmmm...have they gotten the message about their supposed poster boy Dizzy Dean?Yes, it is obvious. Clark = Clintons, so Dean is in their sites. Fortunately Harkin came out and probably saved the day by endorsing, or saying he was going to endorse, Dean.
We'll get to Dean all in good time. Let him win the nomination outright first, then let all hell break loose.
18 posted on
01/09/2004 12:43:29 PM PST by
cyncooper
("The evil is in plain sight")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson