Skip to comments.
Denmark: Possible Iraqi Blister Gas Weapons Found
Yahoo (Reuters) ^
| 1/10/04
| Reuters staff
Posted on 01/10/2004 11:58:35 AM PST by The_Victor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-193 next last
To: The_Victor
Jay Rockefeller, Dean, Clark and the rest will say that unless we have proof that Saddam had produced WMD agents the day we started dropping JDAMs and had them loaded to launch at us in 45 minutes time, then Bush is a liar and the war was the wrong move.
61
posted on
01/10/2004 1:03:18 PM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
To: verity
No, the inside of the shell was solid but the Bush tax cut liquefied it.
Wow. Thinking like a liberal is so easy.
62
posted on
01/10/2004 1:04:00 PM PST
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
To: Dog Gone
The leftists will never be satisfied no matter what is found, so who cares what they think?
63
posted on
01/10/2004 1:04:07 PM PST
by
Pubbie
(* Bill Owens 2008 *)
To: John H K
Um...finding them and turning them over for testing has far more to do with prudence than PR value. The administration didn't order this article written and does not wield control over every member of every coalition force that might find or hear about a cache. It just happens.
64
posted on
01/10/2004 1:05:14 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: GraniteStateConservative
"Jay Rockefeller, Dean, Clark and the rest will say that unless we have proof that Saddam had produced WMD agents the day we started dropping JDAMs and had them loaded to launch at us in 45 minutes time, then Bush is a liar and the war was the wrong move."
That's what some "Freepers" are starting to say on this very thread!
65
posted on
01/10/2004 1:05:35 PM PST
by
Pubbie
(* Bill Owens 2008 *)
To: dagnabbit
"It's questionable whether those shells are even fireable" Not even questionable. How prescient of you, given that you are presumeably not on the ground but have only seen photos of two of the shells.
So far only 36 have been unearthed. It is said that there maybe be a hundred or more buried.
You don't think they might have picked the ones that were the most corroded or leaking for the photos, do you?
In any case, this argument is moot. The claim was that Iraq had stockpiled mustard gas. If these shells contain mustard gas (which is pretty easy to discern), then the claim has been verified.
66
posted on
01/10/2004 1:06:06 PM PST
by
Hon
To: Pubbie
...What DO you guys want Army to find? - a working Neutron bomb?....
One wouldn't be enough unless it was detonated in Washington DC.
67
posted on
01/10/2004 1:08:38 PM PST
by
Joe_October
(Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
To: Pubbie
The leftists will never be satisfied no matter what is found, so who cares what they think? Well, then we should at least be honest with ourselves. This discovery is not the evidence we should say proves that Iraq had WMD capability last year. At most, it proves that they were trying to hide WMD a long time ago.
68
posted on
01/10/2004 1:10:02 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Joe_October
"One wouldn't be enough unless it was detonated in Washington DC."
And then they will say "Saddam wasn't behind it because he would never work with Islamic extremists because his government is 'Secular'"
69
posted on
01/10/2004 1:10:47 PM PST
by
Pubbie
(* Bill Owens 2008 *)
To: Pubbie
Leftie: "These are chemical weapons provided to the Iraqis by Reagan and Rumsfeld in the 1980s, blah, blah, blah. The United States is at fault, blah, blah, blah..."
The hard left is a sick bunch and incapable of admitting they are wrong about anything, so this find will not convince them. They are going to mock the fact that Danish troops found these and not GWB himself, thereby proving his incompetence. That's the way they think, which is one reason I no longer partake in debates with the left, it's like trying to hold a rational discussion with Charley Manson.
70
posted on
01/10/2004 1:11:16 PM PST
by
Azzurri
To: John H K
Won't be happy until they find a nuke? It would probably have to be in pristine condition sitting on top of a Russian ICBM with NYC coordinates still loaded. Even then, if the propellant wasn't in the missile you'd probably consider it harmless.
71
posted on
01/10/2004 1:11:32 PM PST
by
Arkie2
To: John H K; Dog Gone
A glance at the pictures shows their condition to be pretty horrible. Rather dubious they were hidden as part of some grand plan to unearth them and use them later. They likely were simply forgotten. However, the terms of the 1991 Gulf War cease-fire directed that Saddam must destroy such weapons and provide documentation of such. Remember that Saddam buried JETS to hide them, so it is highly questionable that he buried these rounds to dispose of them, and instead was probably trying to hide them from inspectors. And it makes you wonder what else is lying beneath the sands...
72
posted on
01/10/2004 1:11:58 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Howard Dean - all bike and no path)
To: The_Victor
To: John H K
74
posted on
01/10/2004 1:15:26 PM PST
by
Hon
To: dirtboy
Yes, I want to find out what else he buried recently.
75
posted on
01/10/2004 1:16:08 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Pubbie
first you people were saying "Saddam had no WMDs since 1998"I don't think I've ever posted anything about Iraqi WMDs until today, and I'm still slightly in favor of this war, because thrashing any Arab country after 9-11 seems like a good idea, even if its the wrong (non-Saudi) one.
That said, these aren't WMDs because they aren't Ws. They're not even components of weapons, like a storage tank of usable blister agent would be. This stuff is debris.
76
posted on
01/10/2004 1:18:18 PM PST
by
dagnabbit
(Tell Bush what to do with his Mexico Merger - Write in Tancredo in your State's primary)
To: All
That's it!! denied WMD discovered in IRAQ
Checkmate
77
posted on
01/10/2004 1:18:19 PM PST
by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
To: Hon
"The claim was that Iraq had stockpiled mustard gas. If these shells contain mustard gas (which is pretty easy to discern), then the claim has been verified."Exactly. Unfortunately, even an actuve nuke won't 'convince' those who don't want to be convinced.
78
posted on
01/10/2004 1:19:21 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Dog Gone
Why were they being hidden?
To: The_Victor
Oh Blixie.......
80
posted on
01/10/2004 1:21:52 PM PST
by
petercooper
(DEAN = Democrats Experiencing Another Nightmare)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-193 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson