Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smiley's (Anti-American) People: How did English anti-Americanism move from the right to the left?
nytimes.com ^ | January 11, 2004 | GEOFFREY WHEATCROFT

Posted on 01/11/2004 12:17:46 AM PST by Destro

DICKENS TO LE CARRÉ Smiley's (Anti-American) People

By GEOFFREY WHEATCROFT

Published: January 11, 2004

"Americans are cowards," Evelyn Waugh sneered.

BATH, ENGLAND — Anyone can see what happened in Iraq. It was nothing more than a war of colonial conquest fought for oil, "dressed up as a crusade for Western life and liberty," and its authors were "a clique of war-hungry Judeo-Christian geopolitical fantasists who hijacked the media and exploited America's post-9/11 psychopathy."

These words are spoken in John Le Carré's new novel "Absolute Friends'' (Little, Brown, 2004). And although it is usually philistine and unfair to blame a novelist for what his fictional creations say, in this case the speaker expressing those opinions is plainly a point-of-view character - there is a vein of anti-Americanism running through his novels from nearly 40 years ago - and the opinions are shared by plenty of Europeans, the English among them.

Maybe "anti-Americanism" is a dubious concept (the idea of being "un-American" still more so). It might suggest bigotry, by analogy with "anti-Semitism," when hating America, whatever else it may be, plainly cannot be a form of racism. The accusation is often invoked by American politicians for their own purposes. But if it means hostility to the administration of the day, then most Americans must themselves have been "anti-American'' at times - since it was almost a logical impossibility, for example, to have admired and supported both President Richard Nixon and President Bill Clinton.

All the same, anyone who lives in the Old World knows that we are talking about something that exists, though it takes different forms from country to country.

Leave aside the hang-ups of Germans about a country that helped defeat them twice in the past century, or of Spaniards about a nation which, in 1898, abruptly destroyed any lingering illusions of Spanish imperial greatness. The sourest version of all is French anti-Americanism. It is also the most irritating. As anyone knows who has ever had to listen to a Rive Gauche cafe intellectual saying (as though he had thought it up himself) that America is the first society ever to pass from barbarism to decadence without an intervening phase of civilization.

A large part of the European left spent a large part of the 20th century hating the United States not because it had economic inequality or Jim Crow but because it did not have show trials, labor camps and the other appurtenances of "actually existing socialism."

If not as virulent as that, English hostility is deeply rooted, for all the common heritage of language, law and political culture. Maybe it's appropriate that those fulminations about war-hungry fantasists appear in a novel, since English anti-Americanism - it might better be called Yank-baiting - has a long literary pedigree. From Dickens to Beerbohm to Waugh to Amis (Kingsley and Martin), English novelists have made fun of the Americans for their vulgarity, pomposity and other traits.

The Americans were supposed to take this in good humor: it is poignant that the greatest of presidents was assassinated while watching an English comedy called "Our American Cousin,'' which mocked the former colonials for their uncouth ways.

Two great novelists, despite their political differences, were united in this prejudice. And it went beyond baiting the raw and clumsy Yanks.

"Of course, the Americans are cowards," Evelyn Waugh cheerfully told Graham Greene. "They are almost all the descendants of wretches who deserted their legitimate monarchs for fear of military service." Our latest anti-American literati share the malice of Waugh and Greene without their sour wit (or genius).

One thing has changed since Lincoln's time. Then it was the English - and often the European - left that revered America as the land of the free. That great republic across the Atlantic had, more truly than France, built a society founded on liberty, equality and fraternity, or so radicals believed.

For the same reason, aristocratic conservatives sneered at America or even actively hated it. Lord Salisbury, the Tory prime minister in the last years of Queen Victoria's reign, who is venerated to this day by the English species of neoconservatives, abhorred American democracy and ardently supported the South in the Civil War.

The crucial turning point came with World War II. It stimulated European anti-Americanism in various ways, some with profound consequences. There was no more extraordinary episode than Hitler's gratuitous decision to declare war on the United States after Pearl Harbor in December 1941. Although he had no obligation to do so, he did it lightly. With his crazy racism, he believed that the Americans were a mongrel nation, enfeebled by Jewish and black blood, whose society and economy were incapable of waging a global war, to say the least a severe miscalculation. That was one illusion the British did not share, but for them, the emergence of the United States as the greatest power on earth was a bitter pill. Some took refuge in denial.

Winston Churchill hymned "the English-speaking peoples" and Anglo-American friendship in a way that glossed over the reality of profoundly different national interests. He also said that he had not become prime minister to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire, to which Franklin D. Roosevelt almost audibly replied that America was not fighting to preserve it.

For Churchill, Roosevelt's Lend-Lease program was an act of selfless generosity, but as reviewers of Conrad Black's new biography of Roosevelt have pointed out, and as John Maynard Keynes saw at the time, its financial terms were very stringent, stripping Great Britain of its currency reserves and all but destroying its exporting economy.

When several million G.I.'s sailed to England from 1942 to 1944, they were met with resentment. "Before the war there was no popular anti-American feeling in this country," George Orwell wrote. "It all dates from the arrival of the American troops," who made the British feel that their country "was now Occupied Territory."

For all that, there was little evidence of popular anti-American feeling in England then, or after the war either, up to this day. This is, among other things (as so often in our damp little island) a class question. Culturally, the British masses are much more friendly to America than what passes for our literary and academic intelligentsia. It is there, from Harold Pinter on the squawking left to Le Carré on the surly right, that the more frenzied expressions of hatred tend to come.

For decades after the war, the British struggled to come to terms with their changed status. In 1962, they were told a little patronizingly by Dean Acheson, a former secretary of state, that they had lost an empire without finding a role, and they genuinely didn't know whether to look across the ocean to America, or toward Europe.

This is still an acute dilemma, maybe without a final answer. Tony Blair's career demonstrates this. In its own way, so does the career of John Le Carré: a writer who has enjoyed much success in America despite an aversion to American power dating from his earliest books, who has no very subtle political understanding, but who all too accurately voices the bitterness of national impotence and decline.

Geoffrey Wheatcroft's books include "The Controversy of Zion" and "Le Tour: A History of the Tour de France."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; eurotwits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Interesting reading....
1 posted on 01/11/2004 12:17:46 AM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
30 Alabama 285.00
9
31.67
215
1.33
341.00
19

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/11/2004 12:18:20 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I think the gist of the article is not that it moved from the right to the left, but rather that it is now on the right and left both.

I just figure if they are going to hate you whatever you do, it becomes background noise. Tune it out.
3 posted on 01/11/2004 12:34:32 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
True enough. Hatred is a complex thing. Many Americans forget that Chirac is a right winger while Blair is a socialist.
4 posted on 01/11/2004 12:48:38 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Destro
For all that, there was little evidence of popular anti-American feeling in England then, or after the war either, up to this day. This is, among other things (as so often in our damp little island) a class question. Culturally, the British masses are much more friendly to America than what passes for our literary and academic intelligentsia. It is there, from Harold Pinter on the squawking left to Le Carré on the surly right, that the more frenzied expressions of hatred tend to come.

For all that, there is little evidence of popular anti-American feeling in America now. This is, ammong other things (as is so often in our huge continent spanning nation) a class question. Cuturally, the American masses are much more friendly to America than what passes for our artistic and acedemic intelligentsia. It is there, from almost all Hollywood actors to college professors in ivied halls, that the more frenzied expressions of hatred tend to come.

5 posted on 01/11/2004 1:13:19 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I guess I'll let my redneck out for a second and just say it requires no darned navel gazing to understand "anti-Americanism". When it comes down to it we are the biggest, the richest and the toughest. It is no more complicated than that. The British Empire was hated when they were the biggest, the richest and the toughest. When it all comes down to it the human race can be boiled down to any playground in the world where the biggest, the richest and the toughest kid is always the most hated, It doesn't matter if that kid is a good guy or a bully.
6 posted on 01/11/2004 1:31:24 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
It isn't difficult to understand envy and fear..for they are both present in human nature.Even the humorous WW2 epithet against our troops,"overpaid,oversexed and over here" has a bit of both of those!

We don't understand that we ought to pay homage to our "betters",the intelligencia on the right or the left,leaving them impotent to impose their superior understanding of the way things ought to be.We are infuriating,can't you see?/sarcasm
7 posted on 01/11/2004 1:46:46 AM PST by MEG33 (We Got Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Yep, I would be the starting quarterback if it wasn't for politics. I have NEVER seen a bench sitter that thought they belonged on the bench.
8 posted on 01/11/2004 2:08:01 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"Americans are cowards," Evelyn Waugh sneered.

I assume this is translated from German.

9 posted on 01/11/2004 2:14:42 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
a writer ...who has no very subtle political understanding....

How true; in The Spy who Came in from the Cold, the East German populace is outraged by the murder of a border guard by a British agent. Subsequent events in the real world indicate that LeCarre may have somewhat overrated popular affection for Grenztruppen.

10 posted on 01/11/2004 4:04:01 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
The only good Englishman is either dead or in the US...
the best dead Englishman are Winston Churchill, Francis Drake and Elizabeth 1st, IMHO.
11 posted on 01/11/2004 4:21:32 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
I'll give you Churchill and WWII, even he was responsible for Gallipoli.

Elizabeth I also, for brilliantly walking a tightrope between the Catholics of the world and the protestants at home.

Francis Drake I consider a Noble pirate, in the best Hollywood tradition, and an intrepid explorer. Politically, though, he seems to have been a dunce. He rather presumed on Elizabeth's friendship, and ended up in the Tower, for years.

He was only let out of prison on the condition that he lead a new expedition against the Spanish treasure fleets in the America's. When he failed, he returned home knowing he would be hung.

For my money, the greatest English head of state was Elizabeth's cousin and successor, James VI of Scotland and I of England.

He managed to keep the peace during his English reign with Catholics, Protestants and Irish. After hanging a few dozen Armstrong's, even the Scots-English border raids came to an end, after 600 years.

Unlike Elizabeth, he never had to fight a war with any outside powers. The Continental powers termed him "the wisest fool in Christendom". He would dream up a brilliant policy (that even I would deem wise), and then order Parliament to implement it.

Of course, this is how he set up his son, Charles I, to start the English civil war.
12 posted on 01/11/2004 4:56:24 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Destro
>>Many Americans forget that Chirac is a right winger while Blair is a socialist.

Saying that "Chirac is a right winger" to a primarily-American reading audience is more than a little misleading. While he is a "right winger" in France, to an American, he is well left-of-center.
13 posted on 01/11/2004 5:02:16 AM PST by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Your 'redneck' is thoughtful and historically aware. Some of us Brits are sad for the loss of Empire, (especially we ex-servicemen who see our ever-shrinking military emasculated by the politicians) but you can't look backwards.
The WWII 'lend-lease' affair did ruin us, there is no doubt. But 'business is business' and we live in a competitive world. The US wanted to be 'top dog' and it succeeded. There was plenty of anti-colonialist idealism in the US at the time. Not surprising considering the history!
However, if you look at the ex-colonies, at least their people had an impartial administration that worked, their people were fed and educated, healthcare, albiet simple, was available and some sort of infra-structure existed. Since independence, and I am thinking of Africa here, all of them went backwards into tribalism, corruption and worse. The US is the biggest and the ugliest on the block right now, its people are free, it is a dynamic society and it has a high standard of living - so its always going to be a target for the envious and the 'has beens'. It is also a living refutation of the bankruptcy of other alternative societies. The Islamists can't understand it at all! But then it will all work out OK when Allah is on the job, and we are all Muslims! Oh yeah!!! I think that the Communists had a similar idea.

By the way, do not count me amongst the fans of Waugh or Le Carre. Both liberal 'Ruperts' (and probably 'Guardian' readers)with their heads up their a$$es.
14 posted on 01/11/2004 5:45:14 AM PST by 5050 no line
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr; iopscusa
I suppose the judicial murder of Catholics for the mere crime of practicing their religion by Elizabeth I is perfectly acceptable behavior.
15 posted on 01/11/2004 5:53:38 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
We don't understand that we ought to pay homage to our "betters"

I beg your pardon, I have a very special salute with which I pay homage to these elitists all the time!

16 posted on 01/11/2004 6:01:40 AM PST by wizardoz ("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Agnes Heep
I assume this is translated from German.

Ha! Good retort. Evelyn Waugh was a pansy anyway.

17 posted on 01/11/2004 6:08:57 AM PST by BunnySlippers (Help Bring Colly-fornia Back ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
I suppose the judicial murder of Catholics for the mere crime of practicing their religion by Elizabeth I.....

On the contrary, it was entirely legal in Elizabethan England for Catholics to practice their religion. What was not legal was to import priests from the continent for the purpose of subversion. Thus, the "priest holes". Of course, many profitted by informing on their enemies, and gaining their lands.

Nobody has ever said Elizabeth was a saint. However, contrast her rule with her sister Mary, who did have tens of thousands burned at the stake for the crime of apostacy, that is, for being protestant.

Contrast Elizabeth also with France, where the crown attempted to murder all French protestants in Paris, the Huegenots, in one day.

18 posted on 01/11/2004 6:46:07 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Destro
<< Interesting reading .... >>

Interesting, indeed.
19 posted on 01/11/2004 6:48:40 AM PST by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster; Destro
<< Saying that "Chirac is a right winger" to a primarily-American reading audience is more than a little misleading. While he is a "right winger" in France, to an American, he is well left-of-center. >>

There are no Euro-peon "right wingers" -- nor yet [Even in the once-great British political potty that goes by that name] any either big or little "C" conservatives.

There are only variations of socialists who argue only about the various ways to squander the confiscated wealth of Europes half dozen or so remaining creators, innovators, producers and manufacturers.

And Chiraq is but a corrupt thief, which makes him absolutely at home among Europe's tens of thousands of lying, looting and uniformly corrupt-thief politicians and bureaucrats.
20 posted on 01/11/2004 7:00:53 AM PST by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson