Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Economics of the Civil War
LewRockwell.com ^ | January 13, 2004 | Mark Thornton and Robert Ekelund

Posted on 01/13/2004 9:01:35 AM PST by Aurelius

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,121-1,131 next last
To: proxy_user
the ONLY MAIN issue was FREEDOM for dixie.

that is the plain unvarnished TRUTH.

the damnyankee apologists want to say that chattel slavery was the issue, as it makes their merciless,hateFILLED,imperialist war against the new dixie republic and the THOUSANDS of atrocities against innocent civilians & helpless CSA POWs look better. the damnedyankee apologists,otoh, KNOW better.

free dixie,sw

21 posted on 01/13/2004 10:26:20 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
also true.<P.free dixie NOW,sw
22 posted on 01/13/2004 10:26:54 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Dishonest abe raised an army to invade our states. All we wanted was to be left alone, we had no desire to bother the states that remained in the union. Instead, a tyrant with little regard for the Constitution waged a war that resulted in the deaths of 600,000 men and of the republic our founders gave us.
23 posted on 01/13/2004 10:32:50 AM PST by rebelyell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Because the plural of "cannon" is "cannon"; hearing it or reading it with the "s" on the end particularly grates on my ear. Just indulging a personal peeve.

As it was for one of my former editors, who was fond of letting anyone who misused that [or the terms pom-poms or shrapnel] that the only time the plural of cannon should conclude with the letter *s* was when it was in a quotation, or in conjunction with the plural term *artillerymens*, as per: The artillerymens pulled their cannons over the hill.

He seemed quite pleased with me when I picked up the John Beidler journalism award for 1991, for which the accompanying presentation plaque includes a small brass cannon. And if I ever get another one of them, I'll have two of those little cannon.

-archy-/-

24 posted on 01/13/2004 10:38:16 AM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rebelyell
EXACTLY so!

lincoln, the GREAT spiller of innocent blood,stone RACIST,tyrant & CHEAP politician was no better than wee willie klintoon, in any regard.

free dixie,sw

25 posted on 01/13/2004 10:38:19 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
It is truly a disgrace that American children are taught that he was a great president.
26 posted on 01/13/2004 10:46:00 AM PST by rebelyell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rebelyell
YEP, it IS!

SADLY, i fear the children of generation Z will be taught that we willie klintoon was a great POTUS & a MORAL man.

free dixie,sw

27 posted on 01/13/2004 10:50:47 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rebelyell
YEP, it IS!

SADLY, i fear the children of generation Z will be taught that we willie klintoon was a great POTUS & a MORAL man.

free dixie,sw

28 posted on 01/13/2004 10:52:25 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rebelyell
All we wanted was to be left alone, we had no desire to bother the states that remained in the union.

It should be noted that you were being left alone until you got frisky and shot up Fort Sumter. You didn't think that we wouldn't be a little miffed at that?

29 posted on 01/13/2004 10:54:07 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: archy
I see that the online MSN dictionary gives the plural as "cannons" and a 1954 Funk & Wagnalls allows either form without preference. Just a sign of the degeneracy of the times in which we live.
30 posted on 01/13/2004 10:56:51 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
You didn't think that we wouldn't be a little miffed at that?

LOL, Non Seq, I thought you were old, but I did not think you were so old you were at Ft Sumter. Sorry, couldn't resist it.

31 posted on 01/13/2004 10:58:39 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
LOL, Non Seq, I thought you were old, but I did not think you were so old you were at Ft Sumter.

A common error. I'm not really that old, I'm just wise beyond my years.

32 posted on 01/13/2004 11:02:35 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Yes, we know. You think the u.S. owned Ft. Sumter because it was, up until Dec. 20th 1860, a military base for that country. The simple fact that it is in the state of South Carolina means nothing to you.
33 posted on 01/13/2004 11:03:41 AM PST by rebelyell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Well, I'm just glad it wasn't because you thought it was supposed to be "canons."
34 posted on 01/13/2004 11:06:46 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rebelyell
You think the u.S. owned Ft. Sumter because it was, up until Dec. 20th 1860, a military base for that country.

The U.S. did own Fort Sumter. It was built by the government on land deeded to the government free and clear by the South Carolina legislature. The legal ownership was not in question.

The simple fact that it is in the state of South Carolina means nothing to you.

No. Why would that make a difference?

35 posted on 01/13/2004 11:08:13 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Some now teach that slavery was the sole cause of the Civil War – an explanation that historians have developed in the twentieth century

Oh, no! Here we go again!

"One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. "-Abraham Lincoln, March 4, 1865.

That was in the nineteenth century, last time I looked.

36 posted on 01/13/2004 11:13:11 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Do you really think men will fight and die over tarriff policy? Men will fight to preserve their families, their culture, and their way of life.

If the tarriff policy effects their families, their culture and their way of life. What about the American Revolution? What is it you think got the colonists so riled up?

37 posted on 01/13/2004 11:52:27 AM PST by PistolPaknMama (pro gun Mother's Day 2004! www.2asisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Just out of curiosity, which is worse: Citing Lincoln to rebut a post from LewRockwell.com, or citing Jonah Goldberg?

< munching popcorn, because this beats pay per view for action and drama any day >

38 posted on 01/13/2004 11:53:48 AM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma
Just out of curiosity, which is worse: Citing Lincoln to rebut a post from LewRockwell.com, or citing Jonah Goldberg?

Jonah.

No contest.

39 posted on 01/13/2004 12:31:25 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Why did almost ALL confederates that never owned slaves go to war..? ..State rights... which were suborned more and more by the north.. thats why..
40 posted on 01/13/2004 12:35:19 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,121-1,131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson