Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court won't block TEXAS GOP's redistricting plan.
Associated Press ^ | 01/16/2004 | Associated Press

Posted on 01/16/2004 12:36:50 PM PST by Licensed-To-Carry

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court refused Friday to block a hard-fought Republican redistricting plan in Texas that could cost Democrats as many as six seats in Congress.

The justices will announce later this year whether they will consider an appeal from congressional Democrats and others who claim that the map dilutes minority voting strength. In the meantime, they rejected an emergency appeal that sought to stop the state from using the new boundaries in this year's elections.

The districts were approved by the Republican-controlled Legislature in a special session following months of partisan bickering, highlighted by two out-of-state walkouts by Democrats.

Republicans contend they could capture as many as 22 of Texas' 32 seats in Congress, up from the present 16, under the new map, which was upheld last week by a federal panel.

The three-judge panel said critics failed to prove the plan was unconstitutional or illegal, but noted they were not ruling on the "wisdom" of the plan.

"We know it is rough and tumble politics, and we are ever mindful that the judiciary must call the fouls without participating in the game," the judges said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: redistricting; texasredistricting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
Great news for Texas and the GOP.
1 posted on 01/16/2004 12:36:51 PM PST by Licensed-To-Carry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
*
2 posted on 01/16/2004 12:38:37 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
Game, set, match!

You lose, democRATs!

3 posted on 01/16/2004 12:38:37 PM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
Great holiday weekend news !!!!
4 posted on 01/16/2004 12:38:42 PM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
Thank God. I guess the four ultra lefties on the Court felt that they couldn't count on O'Connor so they didn't grant Cert.

Unfortunately I'm going to be stuck with Rat Chet Edwards as my CongressCritter.

5 posted on 01/16/2004 12:38:55 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
Good that they said so, but no surprise.

The legislature did a good, careful job of redrawing district lines.
6 posted on 01/16/2004 12:40:35 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
It never was in doubt. The Justice who made the decision not to grant the stay was Scalia.

I can't wait to hear the Rats whining, although I know exactly what they'll say.

7 posted on 01/16/2004 12:41:14 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
Yes, indeed. I didn't think they would want to get involved again in Legislative branch matters -- but you never know.
8 posted on 01/16/2004 12:41:57 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
Sweeeeeet. Ensures GOP control of the house. "K" street pay attention...To the victor go the spoils.
9 posted on 01/16/2004 12:42:22 PM PST by Wheee The People (If this post doesn't make any sense, then it also doubles as a bump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
To me this was a no-brainer, but it is good to see the SCOTUS actually uphold State's Rights for once.
10 posted on 01/16/2004 12:42:46 PM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
Proud to be an ex-Rat, and especially proud to be a Texan!
11 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:38 PM PST by lormand (Dead People Vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Great! Take that you weasels.

Next time maybe they will stay and do the job they were elected to do.

You were right Dog Gone!

Dont Mess with Texas.

12 posted on 01/16/2004 12:45:39 PM PST by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
This and JUDGE Pickering too?

Be still my heart!!

13 posted on 01/16/2004 12:46:26 PM PST by YaYa123 (@Take That DAOs.co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry; BibChr; rhema; The Big Econ
"We know it is rough and tumble politics, and we are ever mindful that the judiciary must call the fouls without participating in the game," the judges said.

Since when did they get religion? Will they henceforth forswear meddling in the states' decisions on abortion and criminal sexual conduct?

14 posted on 01/16/2004 12:46:45 PM PST by Caleb1411
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie; Torie; ambrose
#
15 posted on 01/16/2004 12:52:14 PM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry
Tom "The Hammer" DeLay does the 'Rats in again
16 posted on 01/16/2004 12:52:34 PM PST by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish
It's still not over in the Supreme Court. All that happened this afternoon was a ruling NOT to issue an emergency order which would have kept the old districts in place.

The arguments that the Rats have could still be heard (and possibly upheld) by the Supreme Court later.

As a practical matter, though, this means that the 2004 elections will take place under the new map, no matter what, and a whole bunch of Democrats are going to find new jobs.

17 posted on 01/16/2004 1:04:29 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry; Squantos; Clinger; GeronL; Billie; Slyfox; San Jacinto; SpookBrat; FITZ; ...
MORE good news, folks ! First the Pickering Recess Appt. and now THIS !:

Supreme Court won't block TEXAS GOP's redistricting plan

Excerpt:

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court refused Friday to block a hard-fought Republican redistricting plan in Texas that could cost Democrats as many as six seats in Congress.

The justices will announce later this year whether they will consider an appeal from congressional Democrats and others who claim that the map dilutes minority voting strength. In the meantime, they rejected an emergency appeal that sought to stop the state from using the new boundaries in this year's elections.


Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Texas or General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.


18 posted on 01/16/2004 1:04:33 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Freeper formerly known as MeeknMing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; deport; hocndoc; Flyer; Eaker; WOSG; lowbridge; Concerned; jmaroneps37; Theodore R.

19 posted on 01/16/2004 1:06:26 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Freeper formerly known as MeeknMing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Thank you, sir !

20 posted on 01/16/2004 1:06:56 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Freeper formerly known as MeeknMing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson