Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientist views nuke 'deterrent'
australian ^ | 1/21/04

Posted on 01/21/2004 3:00:47 PM PST by knak

A TOP US scientist's gave a dramatic account today of how he held a dense, grey and warm lump of North Korean plutonium, during a rare tour of the Stalinist state's notorious nuclear factory.

Siegfried Hecker carved a vivid new angle on the North Korean nuclear crisis with his first public testimony about his visit two weeks ago to Yongbyon, a nuclear complex at the centre of a Cold War-style showdown between Washington and Pyongyang.

Hecker described how North Korean boffins offered to show him their nuclear "deterrent".

"When I expressed my scepticism, they said, 'Well, would you like to see the product?'" Hecker, senior fellow at Los Alamos National Laboratory, told a hushed hearing room used by the Senate Foreign Relations committee.

Proud scientists took a red metal box into the conference room where Hecker and the non-governmental delegation of which he was a part, was waiting. Inside was a white wooden box with a slide-off top.

Inside that lay two "jelly jars" each with a tightly taped screw-on lid, Hecker said.

One contained green plutonium oxalate powder, a chemical form of plutonium which is a by-product of reprocessing plutonium to turn it into weapons-grade material.

"The second jar, they said 'Well, that's the product. It's 200 grams of plutonium metal'."

(Around six kg of plutonium would be enough for a crude nuclear weapon, according to US congressional estimates.)

"I looked at it very closely and it looked like it could be plutonium," Hecker told the senators including Republican committee chairman Dick Lugar and ranking Democrat Joseph Biden, congressional aides and a phalanx of journalists.

"I looked at the metal. It was a peculiar shape that I, to this day, have not figured out why - and that is a funnel shape, thin-walled - and I described the dimensions in my testimony."

Then Hecker, a thin grey-haired figure using language easily understood by his audience of nuclear neophytes, said he decided he needed to hold the sample, noting that plutonium does not have a field of penetrating radiation that makes it dangerous to handle.

"Inside a heavy-wall glass jar, that plutonium is not going to do anything to you, you know, and in spite of the popular belief that plutonium is the most dangerous (thing) in the entire world, that's just not true.

"The first comment I made was, 'You know, it's not very warm,' but it was warm", a property consistent with processed plutonium.

"In terms of the weight, you know, it seemed about right."

Hecker cautioned that he was unable to give iron-clad confirmation that the metal in his hand was plutonium, stressing that he was on an observation mission and did not carry measuring instruments.

He could not say if the metal had been recently reprocessed from 8000 spent fuel rods taken by North Korea from a holding pond where they had been under international observation before the nuclear crisis erupted in October 2002.

Pyongyang has said it completed reprocessing the rods, which US experts say could give it sufficient plutonium for five or six nuclear devices.

Hecker was part of two non-governmental US delegations that visited Yongbyon earlier this month, part of what North Korean officials said was a bid to break a stalemate in diplomatic efforts to end the nuclear crisis.

He said he believed he had been invited so the Stalinist state could prove that it had processed the spent fuel rods and had made a nuclear "deterrent".

But he was unable to go that far, asserting instead that Pyongyang had proven its capacity to process plutonium, but not that it had done so or taken the difficult step of weaponising the material.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deterrent; iaea; northkorea; nukes

1 posted on 01/21/2004 3:00:47 PM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knak
Another Carter success story. Just like Iran.
2 posted on 01/21/2004 3:02:44 PM PST by Only1choice____Freedom (The word system implies they have done something the same way at least twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only1choice____Freedom
Nothing happens in NK without the PRC's approval.
3 posted on 01/21/2004 3:04:49 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knak
unable to give iron-clad confirmation that the metal in his hand was plutonium

Perhaps copper-clad or aluminum-clad. Some kind of metal-clad.

4 posted on 01/21/2004 3:05:31 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
in spite of the popular belief that plutonium is the most dangerous (thing) in the entire world, that's just not true.

Wait a minute. Does this mean that we aren't getting correct facts on nuclear power/weapons from the popular media? This can't be true, can it?

5 posted on 01/21/2004 3:05:36 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
Message to Allies - N U K E N O R T H K O R E A
6 posted on 01/21/2004 3:05:37 PM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
But he was unable to go that far, asserting instead that Pyongyang had proven its capacity to process plutonium, but not that it had done so or taken the difficult step of weaponising the material.

But it could make a heckuva dirty bomb?

7 posted on 01/21/2004 3:09:34 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Nothing happens in NK without the PRC's approval.

Another message from Kim Ill no doubt.

Is the SpecOps chopper warmed up yet?

8 posted on 01/21/2004 3:14:11 PM PST by Only1choice____Freedom (The word system implies they have done something the same way at least twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
But it could make a heckuva dirty bomb?

If you can hold the stuff in your hands, I doubt scattering it about a few city blocks would be as harmful as other radioactive elements.

I'm no physicist, but I think all the hoopla about plutonium being "the most dangerous stuff on the planet" may only mean it's half life is very long, and/or you can make nukes from it.

Maybe it's chemically toxic? The guy here did have it in a glass jar.

9 posted on 01/21/2004 3:15:54 PM PST by narby (The Greens, like the Nazis before them, are inordinate, i.e., there is no limit to their demands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Only1choice____Freedom
Another Carter success story.

Now, now. You're being unkind to the "great ex-president." You have to put some of the blame on Wild Willy and Mad Maddie, after all.

I'm actually intrigued by the testimony about the funnel shape of the plutonium. That could be a result of machining it to act as the first stage of a multi-stage device (an H bomb). A single stage fission device in Times Square would destroy much of the center of New York City. A multi stage fusion device in the same place could destroy all five buroughs of New York City and much of the surrounding suburbs.

Well, hopefully they based their design on the technical information in Tom Clancy's Sum Of All Fears. He built in some intentional errors to throw off any terrorists (he actually acknowledged that it was so easy to find the design info that doing so was virtually a useless gesture, but he did it anyway).

I just flashed on this great image of Edward Teller, the "father of the H Bomb," sitting on a cloud in heaven (yeah, I'm assuming alot for old Doc Strangelove) and arranging a nudge on a convenient comet to impact on North Korea. If he could he'd do it too.

10 posted on 01/21/2004 3:16:55 PM PST by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knak
         
           





Plutonium - Pu

General Information

Discovery

Plutonium was discovered by G.T. Seaborg, A.C. Wahl and J. W. Kennedy in 1940 in California, USA.

Appearance

Plutonium is a radioactive silvery metal that tarnishes in air to give an oxide coating with yellow tinge.

Source

The greatest source of plutonium - and one that produces 20,000 kilograms every year - is the irradiation of uranium in nuclear reactors. This produces the isotope
239Pu, with a half-life of 24400 years.

Uses

Plutonium was used in several of the first atomic bombs, and is still used in bomb-making. The complete detonation of a kilogram of plutonium produces an explosion equivalent to over 10000 tonnes of chemical explosive. Plutonium is also a key material in the development of nuclear power. It has been used as a compact energy source on space missions such as the Apollo lunar missions.

Biological Role

Plutonium has no known biological role. It is extremely toxic due to its radioactivity.

General Information

Plutonium is attacked by oxygen, steam and acids, but not by alkalis. The metal is warm to the touch because of the energy given off in alpha decay, and a large piece of the metal can boil water. Plutonium forms compounds with oxygen, the halides, carbon, nitrogen and silicon.




  Physical Information    
  Atomic Number   94
  Relative Atomic Mass (12C=12.000)   244 (radioactive)
  Melting Point/K   914
  Boiling Point/K   3505
  Density/kg m-3   19840 (298K)
  Ground State Electron Configuration   [Rn]5f67s2


  Key Isotopes        
  nuclide 239Pu 242Pu 244Pu  
  atomic mass 239.05 242.06 244.06  
  natural abundance 0% 0% 0%  
  half-life 24400 yrs 3.79x105 yrs 8.2x107 yrs  


Other Information  
Enthalpy of Fusion/kJ mol-1 2.8
Enthalpy of Vaporisation/kJ mol-1 343.5
     
Oxidation States  
main Pu+4
others Pu+2, Pu+3, Pu+5, Pu+6,
  Pu+7
  Ionisation Energies/kJ mol-1
  M - M+ 585
  M+ - M2+  
  M2+ - M3+  
  M3+ - M4+  
  M4+ - M5+  
  M5+ - M6+  
  M6+ - M7+
  M7+ - M8+  
  M8+ - M9+  
  M9+ - M10+  





11 posted on 01/21/2004 3:35:33 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby
Maybe it's chemically toxic?

No, it's inhalation of particles that will do you. So it's a very specific type of radiotoxicity. Chemically I doubt it is much worse than lead.

12 posted on 01/21/2004 3:41:37 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Toxic if you breathe it in.
13 posted on 01/21/2004 3:43:46 PM PST by Kirkwood ("When the s*** hits the fan, there is enough for everyone.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
So I would infer that if it could be vaporized (gaseous chemical compound, not the metal) and sprayed in the air, it would be quite a poison.
14 posted on 01/21/2004 3:44:56 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The alpha particles cannot get through your skin but once the emitter ie plutonium, is inside your body you cannot get rid of it ie stays in your lungs, organs or bones..then the alpha particles can get you from the inside. plutonium is an abundant alpha particle emitter.

The same thing can happen with tritium & radium inside your body, tritium is used in nightsights on firearms and in the hands of some watches, radium was used in dials and older watch hands. Although I dont know of many people that try to ingest gun sights watch hands or old dials...

Another isotope close at hand is Americium. It is used in smoke detectors and can be used as a portable source of gamma rays. Americium moves rapidly through the body after uptake and is concentrated within the bones for a long period of time. During this storage americium will slowly decay and release radioactive particles and rays. These rays can cause alteration of genetic materials and bone cancers.


Scary stuff huh...
15 posted on 01/21/2004 4:10:33 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson