Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pa. lawmaker wants drug tests for high schoolers
The Dominion Post ^ | 1/22/04 | AP

Posted on 01/22/2004 8:12:56 AM PST by the_devils_advocate_666

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Following up on plans outlined in President Bush's annual address to the American people, a Pennsylvania lawmaker formally introduced a new program Wednesday encouraging public schools to test students for drug use.

The $23 million testing plan, targeted at grades 8-12, would not be mandatory, but parents who do not want their children to participate would have to opt out. It is sure to draw critics who argue the pilot program will invade student privacy.

But Rep. John Peterson, R-Pa., said efforts to get youngsters off drugs far outweigh any concerns over their privacy.

''This is about helping kids,'' Peterson said, noting that recent studies indicate 54 percent of high school seniors in 2001 had tried an illicit drug.

''In my view, I'd like to see everybody tested,'' Peterson said.

Courts have previously upheld the right of schools to test students involved in extracurricular activities, including sports, for drug use. Peterson's plan would give individual schools wide discretion in random testing of all high school students by a doctor or other medical review officer.

Drug test results would only be shared with parents and school officials -- and would not be turned over to police or law enforcement authorities, Peterson said.

The president of the national Parent-Teacher Association said any drug testing programs would have to involve strong parent involvement to avoid opposition.

''We have very strong beliefs that parents need to be involved and that students' privacy need to be protected,' said National PTA President Linda Hodge.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 23million; addiction; children; drugs; drugtests; kids; pta; school; testing; wod; wodlist
It's for the children...
1 posted on 01/22/2004 8:12:57 AM PST by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
"the pilot program will invade student privacy..."

BS, if you are going to introduce poison to the students of that school you deserve no privacy.
2 posted on 01/22/2004 8:15:01 AM PST by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
Rep. John Peterson, R-Pa., said efforts to get youngsters off drugs far outweigh any concerns over their privacy.

Translation: Rep. John Peterson, RINO-Pa., said efforts to be a busybody far outweigh any concerns over rights.

3 posted on 01/22/2004 8:18:10 AM PST by RandomUserName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
Yet another reason to home school.
4 posted on 01/22/2004 8:18:48 AM PST by JohnGalt ("How few were left who had seen the Republic!"- Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
Yeah, and I want drug tests for Pennsylvania lawmakers.
5 posted on 01/22/2004 8:19:08 AM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
But Rep. John Peterson, R-Pa., said efforts to get youngsters off drugs far outweigh any concerns over their privacy.

Further gov intrusion into what should be a parent's responsibility is not a conservative value. It's time to start weeding some of these RINOs who don't understand this concept out of the party.

6 posted on 01/22/2004 8:19:37 AM PST by westerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
Free people do not pee for their government.
7 posted on 01/22/2004 8:28:38 AM PST by Lexington Green (... and a cavity search for every child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
I wonder how much in campaign contributions this guy receives from the Drug Testing Industry?
8 posted on 01/22/2004 8:29:01 AM PST by Pern ("It's good to know who hates you, and it's good to be hated by the right people." - Johnny Cash, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
"The $23 million testing plan, targeted at grades 8-12, would not be mandatory, but parents who do not want their children to participate would have to opt out."

Opt Out? What kind of attention will that get you? 23 million for a testing plan when you can go down the street and get a home test at the local drug store. Leave this to the parents, please. It's facism at it's finest.

"Drug test results would only be shared with parents and school officials -- and would not be turned over to police or law enforcement authorities, Peterson said."

Assurances today, to be removed at a later date, just like those stupid seat belt laws.

9 posted on 01/22/2004 8:39:31 AM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
But Rep. John Peterson, R-Pa., said efforts to get youngsters off drugs far outweigh any concerns over their privacy.

This may seem trite, but, perhaps it would be better to resolve issues with school policy in PA first. Consider, for example, in Hazelton, a teenage girl missed 75 days of school, had below average grades, and was still promoted to 10th grade. The situation is even worse now.

The mother drives the kid to school, and she walks in, and then leaves. The mother tried counseling, but the kid refused to go. A troubled kid indeed.

How does the scool and the justice system respond? They charge the mother and fine her over $300. She does not have the money so she makes payments. The kid continues, and the judge fines her another $300. Social services says not our problem, it is a school problem, and school says not ours, talk to social services.

For a single mother trying to make ends meet, the system in Hazelton has completely failed her.

10 posted on 01/22/2004 8:39:51 AM PST by rit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
Same kid from my earlier post. They suspected she may have a drug problem and agreed to random drug tests. Then told the kid it is either tuesday or thursday. I guess that is what they meant by random.
11 posted on 01/22/2004 8:41:24 AM PST by rit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green; jmc813; *Wod_list
Free people do not pee for their government.

Maybe it's worth $23 million to teach kids not to trust the government.

12 posted on 01/22/2004 8:46:14 AM PST by Land of the Free 04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
Mass testing would be stupid and expensive $25,000,000 would be better spent on stuff for the schools use in educating. What they could do instead was to test students who commit dangerous, disruptive, or illegal actions in school or at school events.

If a test came back positive the parents would then have to pay for the test. If they didn't the child would not get his grades or diploma. No grades, no advancement to next grade.

This would not waste taxpayer dollars and make the parents responsible for the children. Case closed, no waste of money.
13 posted on 01/22/2004 9:54:57 AM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson