Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Enigma of Benedict Arnold
Archiving Early America ^ | N/A | James Henretta

Posted on 02/01/2004 8:57:21 AM PST by Hon

Benedict Arnold was different: a military hero for both sides in the same war. He began his career as an American Patriot in May 1775, when he and Ethan Allen led the brigade that captured Fort Ticonderoga on Lake Champlain. Arnold's heroics continued in September, when he led an expedition of 1,150 riflemen against Quebec, the capital of British Canada. The American commander drove his men hard through the Maine wilderness, overcoming leaky boats, spoiled provisions, treacherous rivers, and near starvation to arrive at Quebec in November, his force reduced to 650 men.

These losses did not deter Arnold. Joined by General Richard Montgomery, who had arrived with 300 troops after capturing Montreal, Arnold's forces attacked the strongly fortified city, only to have the assault end in disaster. A hundred Americans were killed, including Montgomery; 400 were captured; and many were wounded, including Arnold, who fell as he stormed over a barricade, a ball through his leg.

Quebec was only the beginning. For the next five years Arnold served the Patriot side with distinction in one battle after another, including a dangerous assault against the center of the British line at Saratoga, where he was again wounded in the leg. No general was more imaginative than Arnold, no field officer more daring, no soldier more courageous.

Yet Arnold has gone down in history not as a hero but as a villain, a military traitor who, as commander of the American fort at West Point, New York, in 1780, schemed to hand it over to the British.

Of his role in this conspiracy there is no doubt. His British contact, Major John Andre, was caught with incriminating documents in Arnold's handwriting, including routes of access to the fort. Arnold, fleeing down the Hudson River on a British ship, defended his treason in a letter to Washington, stating that "love to my country actuates my present conduct, however it may appear inconsistent to the world, who very seldom judge right of any man's actions."

But judge we must. Why did Arnold desert the cause for which he had fought so gallantly and twice been wounded? Was there any justification for his conduct?

When the fighting began at Lexington and Concord in April 1775, Arnold was thirty-four, an apothecary and minor merchant in New Haven, Connecticutobut also a militia captain and ardent Patriot. "Good God," he had exclaimed at the time of the Boston Massacre, "are the Americans all asleep and tamely giving up their Liberties"? Eager to support the rebellion, Arnold coerced the Town's selectmen into supplying powder and ball to his men and promptly marched them to Boston, which was under siege by the New England militia. On the way Arnold thought up the attack on Fort Ticonderoga (realizing that the fort's cannon could be used to force the British out of Boston) and persuaded the Massachusetts Committee of Safety to approve his plan and make him a colonel. That done, he raced to New York to take command so that the glory would be his and not go to Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys. The victory achieved, Arnold submitted an inflated claim for expenses (oe l,060 in Massachusetts currency, or about $60,000 today) and protested vehemently when the suspicious legislators closely examined each item.

These events illuminated Arnold's great strengths and fatal flaws and were prophetic of his ultimate fate. He was bold and creative, a man who sized up a situation and acted quickly. He was ambitious and extravagant, an egocentric man who craved power and the financial rewards that came with it. He was intrepid and ruthless, willing to risk his life "and the lives of others" to get what he wanted.

Such men often are resented as much as they are admired, and so it was with Arnold. At Quebec some New England officers accused him of arrogance and tried to withdraw from his command, but Congress rewarded the intrepid colonel by making him a brigadier general. When Arnold again distinguished himself in battle in early I 777 "having his horse shot out from under him" Congress promoted him to major general and gave him a new horse "as a token of their admiration of his gallant conduct." But then, in the middle of the struggle at Saratoga, General Horatio Gates, the American commander, relieved Arnold of his command, partly for insubordination and partly because Gates considered him a "pompous little fellow." Washington rewarded Arnold nonetheless, appointing him commandant at Philadelphia in July 1778, after the British evacuation of the city.

By then Arnold was an embittered man, disdainful of his fellow officers and resentful toward Congress for not promoting him more quickly and to even higher rank. A widower, he threw himself into the social life of the city, holding grand parties, courting and marrying Margaret Shippen, "a talented young woman of good family, who at nineteen, was half his age" and failing deeply into debt. Arnold's extravagance drew him into shady financial schemes and into disrepute with Congress, which investigated his accounts and recommended a court-martial. "Having ... become a cripple in the service of my country, I little expected to meet [such] ungrateful returns," he complained to Washington.

Faced with financial ruin, uncertain of future promotion, and disgusted with congressional politics, Arnold made a fateful decision: he would seek fortune and fame in the service of Great Britain. With cool calculation, he initiated correspondence with Sir Henry Clinton, the British commander, promising to deliver West Point and its 3,000 defenders for 2O,OOO sterling (about $1 million today), a momentous act that he hoped would spark the collapse of the American cause. Persuading Washington to place the fort under his command, Arnold moved in September 1780 to execute his audacious plan, only to see it fail when Andre, was captured. As Andre, was executed as a spy, Arnold received ce 6,000 from the British government and appointment as a brigadier general.

Arnold served George III with the same skill and daring he had shown in the Patriot cause. In 1781 he led devastating strikes on Patriot supply depots: In Virginia he looted Richmond and destroyed munitions and grain intended for the American army opposing Lord Cornwallis; in Connecticut he burned ships, warehouses, and much of the town of New London, a major port for Patriot privateers.

In the end, Benedict Arnold's "moral failure lay not in his disenchantment with the American cause" for many other officers returned to civilian life disgusted with the decline in republican virtue and angry over their failure to win a guaranteed pension from Congress. Nor did his infamy stem from his transfer of allegiance to the British side, for other Patriots chose to become Loyalists, sometimes out of principle but just as often for personal gain. Arnold's perfidy lay in the abuse of his position of authority and trust: he would betray West Point and its garrison "and if necessary the entire American war effort" to secure his own success. His treason was not that of a principled man but that of a selfish one, and he never lived that down. Hated in America as a consort of "Beelzebub ... the Devil," Arnold was treated with coldness and even contempt in Britain. He died as he lived, a man without a country.




TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benedictarnold; georgeiii; history; revolutionarywar; traitor; twofacedmojo; ushistory
The story seems marginally relevant someehow. Turns out you can be a "hero" and still a traitor.
1 posted on 02/01/2004 8:57:22 AM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hon
The story seems marginally relevant someehow. Turns out you can be a "hero" and still a traitor.

Amazing--I was thinking the same thing immediately before I saw this posted article.

2 posted on 02/01/2004 9:00:57 AM PST by mondonico (Peace through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
This is how a lengthy article on Arnold (in American History Magazine) wraps up:

"Arnold ultimately defected due to perceived grievances he had suffered at the hands of Congress and the military, his mounting debts, corruption charges filed against him by Pennsylvania civil authorities that resulted in Arnold demanding an investigation to clear his name, and his indignation at the French alliance.

Only in recent years have historians fully acknowledged Arnold's contributions to the American cause. The virtual burial of his outstanding military reputation began as soon as news of his treason came to light. Brigadier General "Mad Anthony" Wayne, for one, suddenly attributed Arnold's bravery to heavy drinking, "even to intoxication." In the years since, the name Benedict Arnold has become virtually synonymous with "traitor."

Ironically, it was Arnold--the American general and the hero of Saratoga--who sealed the French alliance that helped guarantee independence for the country he had betrayed."

http://americanhistory.about.com/library/prm/blbenedictarnold4.htm
3 posted on 02/01/2004 9:02:55 AM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hon
He was ambitious and extravagant, an egocentric man who craved power and the financial rewards that came with it. He was intrepid and ruthless, willing to risk his life "and the lives of others" to get what he wanted. Such men often are resented as much as they are admired, and so it was with Arnold.

Reminds me of Wesley Clark.

4 posted on 02/01/2004 9:09:10 AM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus
"He was intrepid and ruthless, willing to risk his life and the lives of others"

Have you ever read the details of the incident that got Kerry his Silver Star?

Some might argue that he recklessly endangered his crew for a grab at glory--which entailed him chasing down and killing a wounded VC.
5 posted on 02/01/2004 9:22:15 AM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hon
Let's see..fought heroically on one side and then turned traitor and changed sides. Hmmm...now who does that remind me of...? It's on the tip of my tongue...


6 posted on 02/01/2004 9:29:26 AM PST by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
To be fair to Arnold, he didn't face the enemy for four months and then get sent back home on a technicality.

I also suspect that his wounds, unlike Kerry's, actually cost him some duty days.
7 posted on 02/01/2004 9:34:06 AM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
This line really struck me:

"No general was more imaginative than Arnold, no field officer more daring, no soldier more courageous."
8 posted on 02/01/2004 9:36:04 AM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hon
>>...Only in recent years have historians fully acknowledged Arnold's contributions to the American cause...<<

He may well have been a hero for the American cause at one point but nevertheless he became a traitor and a traitor he'll always be.

9 posted on 02/01/2004 9:46:37 AM PST by FReepaholic (Never Forget: www.september-11-videos.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
The story seems marginally relevant someehow. Turns out you can be a "hero" and still a traitor.

Amazing--I was thinking the same thing immediately before I saw this posted article.

Not 15 minutes ago, I posted something similar to this point on a different thread. It was about how Terry M and the DNC plan to make a big stink over President Bush being AWOL during Vietnam. My point that serving with distinction doesn't automatically make one a good civilian political leader, or even a decent person, for that matter.

Mark

10 posted on 02/01/2004 9:47:01 AM PST by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hon
I have no doubt that Arnold was more honorable than Kerry.
11 posted on 02/01/2004 10:21:22 AM PST by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
You can still eat today at the Tavern used to hold Bendict Arnold's British co-conspitator, Major Andre. Right in Old Tappan, NJ. Across the street is the church where they tried him. Upstairs above the tavern is where they jailed him. Just a short walk up the hill is the tree they hung him from.
12 posted on 02/01/2004 10:25:57 AM PST by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hon
"Sir Henry Clinton!"

It had to be. I bet this tory scum had a wife too. Lady Hillary was probably responsible for procurring beef for the British occupation forces.

13 posted on 02/01/2004 10:28:15 AM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hon
If you're going to have a meaningful discussion of Arnold, you need to have some mentiion of his pro-British wife, Peggy Shippen.
You also might want to mention what happened to Arnold in his later years [in London] where he was shunned by adherents of both sides.
14 posted on 02/01/2004 10:37:49 AM PST by curmudgeonII (Cherchez la femme.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
I had no intention of having a meaningful discussion of Arnold. I only meant to remind people that even people with heroic military accomplishments can turn traitor.

The one doesn't preclude the other.
15 posted on 02/01/2004 10:43:09 AM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hon
If Benedict Arnold had died after the victory at Saratoga, or any time before he tried to betray West Point, he would have gone down as one of the greatest heroes in American history...his name would be all over the map of the U.S. today. Instead, for some cash, he turned traitor and should always be remembered for that. (Of course, in the textbooks of the future, he will be ignored and the figures students will be taught to revile will all be Republican Presidents.) Even the British didn't respect him.

Henretta is a leftist college professor (University of Maryland)...he tries to make it sound like what Arnold did wasn't so unusual, but it was. There were other Patriots who became Loyalists, but they were (in many cases) honorable people who simply thought that declaring independence was going too far, not scoundrels like Arnold.

16 posted on 02/01/2004 11:33:43 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hon
Bait for those who will not mention that name.

Ignore it.
17 posted on 02/01/2004 11:51:56 AM PST by MonroeDNA (Soros is the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
My point that serving with distinction doesn't automatically make one a good civilian political leader, or even a decent person, for that matter.

Quite true. Let us not forget that Timothy McVeigh was awarded the Bronze Star.

America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
http://12thman.us/media/jihad.rm (Requires RealPlayer)

Who is Steve Emerson?

18 posted on 02/01/2004 1:08:31 PM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hon
An interesting anecdote is that at the end, alone in England and dying he asked that he be buried in his American General's uniform.

He knew what he had done, and too late regretted it.

Regards,

19 posted on 02/01/2004 5:37:44 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson