The people v. Scott Peterson

San Mateo Journal ^ | Feb 2 2004 | Michelle Durand

[runningbear]

bummer too!

[Devil_Anse]

LOL. I'm glad you remembered to call the roll!

[kmiller1k]

bump for later

[Devil_Anse]

I'm sure TS and CD were late because they were working frantically to hack into the San Mateo County court computer system. If they don't get at least one Peterson case document per day to study, I think they get feverish and pale.

[Devil_Anse]

I'm sure the media moguls WILL appeal! They have a lot of money at stake!

[Devil_Anse]

"Yes, it is a regrettable necessity"???

ROFLMAO!!

Who does he think he is, Winston Churchill??

That boy ain't right!

[Palladin]

Winston Churchill...good one! LOL!

[Devil_Anse]

Oooh, and you even made it wallet-sized! Thanks for the pic, Jackie!!

[Devil_Anse]

That scum had the nerve to ask for a laptop in his cell?? That's pathetic.

Did they bring him in his own giant-sized screen for the Super Bowl yesterday, I wonder?

[Devil_Anse]

Hi Jackie!! I'm here, missed all the conversation as usual!

If one more person asks me, "Did you see Janet Jackson?" or "Did you hear about Janet Jackson?" I may have aggitta!!!!

My better half says Janet just did that to get the public to start thinking of her breasts, and to stop thinking of Michael's... you know.

[Devil_Anse]

I hate it when a truck passes by during a rainstorm!!!

[Devil_Anse]

Scott might as well start coming to court with little frilly, lacy collars and cuffs, like Little Lord Fauntleroy!! He is too weird for words.

[Freedom2specul8]

I can't believe there is already a book and a movie out over this.. Hollywood makes me wanna puke.

[fiesti]

Just heard on Court TV - no cameras in the trial!

I am late and behind today but heard this on Greta and to put it mildly I am LIVID....We have to depend on the media everynight for news on the goings on in the trial....We have been sequestered long enough......Wanna see Scotts face when they say GUILTY on2 counts of premediated murder....I don't have an opinion lol

[runningbear]

oh yeah!!! ;o) heehee...

[Jackie-O]

Yeah he asked for a laptop...MG says he had thousands of pages of documents to review. Judge told him to do it the old fashion way.

[Jackie-O]

Found this on CNN this AM...Kenneth Parnell on trial for trying to buy a boy. http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/02/stayner.kidnapper.ap/index.html Infamous kidnapper on trial in child-buying case

[Jackie-O]

Need to practice..work on formatting.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/02/stayner.kidnapper.ap/index.html

[Devil_Anse]

LOL. I hope the judge never changes his mind. Since when does this two-bit former unsuccessful fertilizer salesman get special privileges?

And you know darn well he just wanted a computer so he could sit there and use the chat features to talk to who-knows-what trampy, lunatic woman. (She'd have to be a loon to have any contact whatsoever with the likes of him.)

[Devil_Anse]

That Stephen Stayner case was one of the biggest denials of justice ever.

You know, Bill Curtis can get on A&E all he wants and whine about how "this or that man was imprisoned falsely" and was "saved" by Barry Scheck and his so-called "Innocence Project". But you'll never hear Bill or Barry say one word about the injustice that occurred when this pervert was able to keep a little boy prisoner for 7 years, and repeatedly sodomize him, causing serious physical injury. The only thing that can be said for this particular pervert is, at least, unlike many of his fellow perverts, he didn't kill the boy.

But, being a child molester, he stole the boy's soul. Stole his life. Stole all of Stephen Stayner's chances of ever having a happy life. I honestly think, Jackie, that pedophiles should be killed. This man should have been killed.

And this man never even went to jail for the Stayner case--or if he did, it was for an extremely short time. Instead, this pervert has been living un-bothered, probably with never a thought for Stephen, whose life he essentially took.

And now look where he is. And people tell us we are supposed to be "tolerant"?