Skip to comments.
AOL MAY DEMAND REFUND FOR PEEP SHOW
New York Post ^
| 2/03/04
| STEPHEN LYNCH
Posted on 02/03/2004 12:39:09 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:19:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: kattracks
Thread #42 in the ongoing
nipplegate saga.
Check the keyword
nipplegate for all the latest coverage in this developing story...
41
posted on
02/03/2004 9:50:48 AM PST
by
flashbunny
("Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig." -Mark Twain)
To: Wumpus Hunter
Seems to me that this is more proof that this stunt was planned ahead of time Possible .. but I'm thinking it's just a way to steer clear of the mess and not pay their bill
42
posted on
02/03/2004 10:23:39 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: MadelineZapeezda
"Classic! Can I use it?"
Sure, no prob. :)
43
posted on
02/03/2004 12:41:56 PM PST
by
Fenris6
To: kattracks
These are crocodile tears, if there ever were any. The stunt could only have increased the level of the exposure for which they were striving, by increasing the ripple effect, i.e. people talking about it the next day.
The function of this statement, now, is to make sure that the public associates AOL with the event; they were probably nervous that otherwise what they paid for might have upstaged the product.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site.
44
posted on
02/03/2004 12:50:42 PM PST
by
Ohioan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson